全文获取类型
收费全文 | 765篇 |
免费 | 115篇 |
国内免费 | 127篇 |
专业分类
1007篇 |
出版年
2024年 | 9篇 |
2023年 | 25篇 |
2022年 | 21篇 |
2021年 | 32篇 |
2020年 | 115篇 |
2019年 | 85篇 |
2018年 | 78篇 |
2017年 | 92篇 |
2016年 | 40篇 |
2015年 | 70篇 |
2014年 | 28篇 |
2013年 | 106篇 |
2012年 | 28篇 |
2011年 | 16篇 |
2010年 | 21篇 |
2009年 | 18篇 |
2008年 | 14篇 |
2007年 | 25篇 |
2006年 | 17篇 |
2005年 | 36篇 |
2004年 | 20篇 |
2003年 | 24篇 |
2002年 | 19篇 |
2001年 | 12篇 |
2000年 | 10篇 |
1999年 | 5篇 |
1998年 | 3篇 |
1997年 | 5篇 |
1996年 | 15篇 |
1995年 | 1篇 |
1994年 | 3篇 |
1993年 | 2篇 |
1992年 | 3篇 |
1990年 | 1篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
1987年 | 1篇 |
1985年 | 1篇 |
1984年 | 1篇 |
1982年 | 1篇 |
1979年 | 1篇 |
1978年 | 1篇 |
1976年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有1007条查询结果,搜索用时 10 毫秒
851.
创造力有其“阴暗面”。从产品角度而言,创造力可产出伤害性或消极的产品;从个体角度而言,高创造力者可能具有一些消极特征,如精神疾病易感性强、宜人性差、说谎、不诚信等;从情境角度而言,高创造力表现可能与不信任感、生存危机感、社会拒绝等消极因素有关。未来研究应开发高生态效度的恶意创造力测评工具,改进计算恶意创造力水平的算法,探索消极个体特征和消极情境因素作用于创造性思维的认知与神经机制。 相似文献
852.
853.
854.
CORINNE FAURE 《创造性行为杂志》2004,38(1):13-34
Although previous research indicates that nominal groups generally outperform interactive groups at brainstorming tasks, companies still favor group interaction because of its presumed benefits beyond the brainstorming task. This study assesses the effectiveness of both types of groups in two domains that follow idea generation: selection of ideas and satisfaction with the process. Results indicate no superiority of interactive over nominal groups in these two domains. In addition, this study compares group effectiveness for groups selecting from their own sets of ideas and groups selecting ideas generated by another group. 相似文献
855.
856.
论如何培养中小学生的创新精神 总被引:5,自引:1,他引:4
本文分析了创新与创造的本质、层次和我国教育至今未培养出获诺贝尔奖的科学家的一部分原因,论述了中小学生创新与创造的定位、创新精神的含义以及如何培养中小学生创新精神的策略与措施。 相似文献
857.
858.
Charley D. Hardwick 《Zygon》2005,40(3):667-682
Abstract. This essay is an appreciative engagement with Karl Peters's Dancing with the Sacred (2002). Peters achieves a naturalistic theology of great power. Two themes are covered here. The first is how Peters gives ontological footing for a naturalistic conception of God conceived as the process of creativity in nature. Peters achieves this by conceiving creativity in terms of Darwinian random variation and natural selection combined with the notion of nonequilibrium thermodynamics. He gives ontological reference for a conception of God similar to Henry Nelson Wieman's idea of creative transformation. The second theme is how Peters succeeds in translating this nonpersonal conception of God into a powerful view of naturalistic religion that can shape a religious form of life. The key is that Peters's God can be understood as present in experience. Peters provides naturalistic interpretations of grace and the cruciform structure of creativity; the latter addresses the problem of evil in a nuanced fashion. I conclude with three critical comments about Peters's environmental ethics, his use of the notion of mystery, and his failure to have a robust conception of human fault or sin. 相似文献
859.
Gregory R. Peterson 《Zygon》2005,40(3):691-700
Abstract. Dancing with the Sacred by Karl Peters provides a coherent and at times moving portrait of the religious naturalist position. I highlight three broad issues that are raised by the kind of religious naturalism that Peters develops: (1) the meaning of the term natural, (2) the nature of God in Peters's naturalistic framework, and (3) the question of eschatology. In each area, I believe that Peters's work raises many questions that need to be addressed and also provides openings for further dialogue. 相似文献
860.
Gordon D. Kaufman 《Zygon》2005,40(2):323-334
Abstract. Instead of focusing my remarks on John Caiazza's interesting and important thesis about the way in which modern technology is drastically secularizing our culture today, I examine the frame within which he sets out his thesis, a frame I regard as seriously flawed. Caiazza's argument is concerned with the broad range of religion/science/technology issues in today's world, but the only religion that he seems to take seriously is what he calls “revealed religion” (Christianity). His consideration of religion is thus narrow and cramped, and this makes it difficult to assess properly the significance of what he calls techno‐secularism. I suggest that employing a broader conception of religion would enable us to see more clearly what is really at stake in the rise of techno‐secularism. Instead of defining the issues in the polarizing terms of revealed religion versus secularity, I argue for a more integrative approach in which concepts are developed that can bring together and hold together major religious insights and themes with modern scientific thinking. If, for example, we give up the anthropomorphism of the traditional idea of God as creator and think of God as simply creativity, it becomes possible to integrate theological insights with current scientific thinking and to formulate the issues posed by the rise of techno‐secularism in a more illuminating way. This in turn should facilitate effective address of those issues. 相似文献