Female Juvenile Offenders: Defining an Early-Onset Pathway for Delinquency

We examined whether childhood factors predict age of first arrest in adolescent girls referred for placement and treatment for serious delinquency problems (N = 62). Measures included child characteristics (i.e., age of menstrual onset, childhood ADHD, and IQ), family environmental factors (i.e., severe punishment, parental transitions, and sexual abuse), biological parent criminality, and juvenile court records. Parental transitions and biological parent criminality significantly predicted the age of first arrest (M = 12.5 years), and IQ showed a trend to be a significant predictor. The final model accounted for 52% of the variance. A younger age of first arrest was related to increased health-risking sexual behaviors and to increased self-reported delinquency. Logistic regression analyses indicted that membership in an early-onset group could be reliably formed using family and child predictors, with accurate classifications for 46-90% of the girls. Family environmental and child characteristics played a strong role in predicting which girls would be arrested at an earlier age. The strong predictive utility of parental transitions and biological parent criminality, in particular, suggest two avenues for identifying girls at risk for delinquency problems.     

International Justice,Human Rights and Neutrality

A number of theorists have tried to resolve the tension between a western-oriented liberal scheme of human rights and an account that accommodates different political systems and constitutional ideals than the liberal one. One important way the tension has been addressed is through a “neutral” or tolerant, notion of human rights, as present in the work of Rawls, Scanlon and Buchanan. In this paper I argue that neutrality cannot by itself explain the difference between rights considered appropriate for liberal states and rights considered to be human rights proper. The central arguments used by neutralist theorists presuppose, rather than justify, this differential treatment. Instead, that difference can be understood only by reference to the purpose of human rights as distinct from the constitutional rights of a liberal state. This requires us to reassess the point and purpose of a theory of international justice, in contrast to justice for a domestic and politically separate society. In the case of a theorist like Rawls, human rights represent guides to the foreign policy of a liberal state, rather than to principles by which all states are expected to abide. That is because of Rawls’ acceptance that no common, authoritative, third-party, institutions capable of imposing duties on all agents uniformly exist or can exist. This also makes his theory inherently conservative about human rights, given that they are simply to act as a guide to which states can be treated as legitimate when it comes to liberal foreign policy: those that possess institutions that can be said to represent a peoples, rather than being imposed through violence. This standard is lower than the ideal set of rights extended to all in a liberal society. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

抗SARS中若干价值观的一项调查

运用情境性故事投射法．以抗SARS为背景编撰关于公正、关爱、公众、敬业、宽容诸价值观念为主题的五个情境故事为刺激材料,以427名大学生和职业青年为对象进行了问卷调查,对他们在与抗SARS有关的上述五个价值观念上的反应倾向及其积极性反应倾向在个体、社会、原则三水平理由上的特点作了探究。     

语篇阅读理解中人物性格模型的建构

采用实时窗口阅读技术,通过操纵特征段落性质和屏蔽段落长度两个变量,探讨人物性格模型在语篇阅读中的建构和影响因素。在研究所用材料中,特征段落描述能反映主人公性格的典型行为或不能反映其性格的一般行为,使其与目标句分别形成冲突或无关关系,考察读者能否利用这些内隐式的行为描述建构人物的性格模型。同时,改变屏蔽段落长度,形成局部或整体联贯两种条件,考察不同联贯类型的影响作用。结果发现：在不论整体还是局部联贯条件下,读者均能利用内隐的行为描述建构人物性格模型,并能应用该模型预期人物的后续行为。     

公正：城市反贫困的伦理标准

公正是人类社会追求的永恒价值理想 ,也是社会发展过程中需要妥善处理的一个难点问题。随着中国社会转型进程的日益加快 ,社会各阶层贫富差距的不断拉大 ,公正原则受到社会现实的极大挑战 ,公正原则的普遍实现与否 ,将决定我国城市反贫困工作的成败。基于上述理由 ,笔者从公正的制度化基础、公正的基本原则和公正原则实现的条件等几方面阐述如何以公正为伦理标准来推进城市反贫困工作。     

论制度安排的正义

制度对我们的一切活动 ,既是基础、保证 ,又是规范、制约 ,还是赏罚、导向。这决定着我们可以在多大的空间里、向什么方向和方位去作为 ;并在付出自己的作为之后 ,应该、可以、事实上得到的是什么、有多少。因此 ,制度的首要价值是正义 ;制度安排是正义的还是不正义的 ,有决定性的意义。     

我国医疗卫生改革中的伦理缺席

“中国的医疗卫生体制改革从总体上说是不成功的”结论的发表在社会上引发了对卫生改革的种种议论,从卫生改革的设计、实施和评估三方面论述了由于政府的缺位和伦理学的缺席,将卫生改革引向功利主义的死胡同,使得卫生改革背离了公正的目标而导致失败。但退回计划经济体制下的办医模式同样没有出路,在今后的深化改革中,必须强调医学目的,贯彻以人为本的指导思想,加大政府的投入,围绕公正目标,建立覆盖全民的医疗保障体制。     

全社会共同努力,在发展中实现卫生公正

“公正”是科学发展观的重要内容,是卫生系统的主要价值取向,实现公正是医药卫生界的神圣职责。目前,在发展中实现卫生公正已经刻不容缓。我们必须以政府为主导,坚持以人为本和卫生公正,树立扶贫济困的社会风气,共同努力,采用多种措施实现卫生公正。     

关于健康公平现实选择

健康公平是全人类共同追求的目标,然而由于经济、社会和文化等因素又造成了健康的极大不公平。如何在现有条件下满足人们对健康的需要,实现健康公平,揭示了健康公平的内涵,以及现实中健康不公平的表现形式;同时,提出健康公平的现实选择应从我国的现实国情出发,解决目前健康不公平问题。