全文获取类型
收费全文 | 165篇 |
免费 | 7篇 |
出版年
2024年 | 1篇 |
2021年 | 1篇 |
2020年 | 3篇 |
2019年 | 1篇 |
2018年 | 4篇 |
2017年 | 3篇 |
2016年 | 2篇 |
2015年 | 3篇 |
2014年 | 1篇 |
2013年 | 6篇 |
2012年 | 1篇 |
2011年 | 1篇 |
2009年 | 4篇 |
2008年 | 4篇 |
2007年 | 7篇 |
2006年 | 12篇 |
2005年 | 14篇 |
2004年 | 10篇 |
2003年 | 10篇 |
2002年 | 8篇 |
2001年 | 4篇 |
2000年 | 9篇 |
1999年 | 7篇 |
1998年 | 9篇 |
1997年 | 7篇 |
1996年 | 2篇 |
1995年 | 10篇 |
1994年 | 1篇 |
1993年 | 2篇 |
1992年 | 6篇 |
1991年 | 1篇 |
1990年 | 4篇 |
1989年 | 3篇 |
1988年 | 6篇 |
1987年 | 5篇 |
排序方式: 共有172条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
71.
Christian Kock 《Argumentation》2009,23(1):61-80
Leading contemporary argumentation theories such as those of Ralph Johnson, van Eemeren and Houtlosser, and Tindale, in their
attempt to address rhetoric, tend to define rhetorical argumentation with reference to (a) the rhetorical arguer’s goal (to
persuade effectively), and (b) the means he employs to do so. However, a central strand in the rhetorical tradition itself,
led by Aristotle, and arguably the dominant view, sees rhetorical argumentation as defined with reference to the domain of
issues discussed. On that view, the domain of rhetorical argumentation is centered on choice of action in the civic sphere,
and the distinctive nature of issues in this domain is considered crucial. Hence, argumentation theories such as those discussed,
insofar as they do not see rhetoric as defined by its distinctive domain, apply an understanding of rhetoric that is historically
inadequate. It is further suggested that theories adopting this understanding of rhetoric risk ignoring important distinctive
features of argumentation about action.
相似文献
Christian KockEmail: |
72.
In this paper, we present a discussion game for argumentationunder stable semantics. Our work is inspired by Vreeswijk andPrakken, who have defined a similar game for preferred semantics.In the current paper, we restate Vreeswijk and Prakken's workusing the approach of argument labellings and then show howit can be adjusted for stable semantics. The nature of the resultingargument game is somewhat unusual, since stable semantics doesnot satisfy the property of relevance. 相似文献
73.
SAMI PIHLSTRÖM 《Metaphilosophy》2009,40(5):656-670
Abstract: This article defends a controversial metaphilosophical thesis: it is not immediately obvious that "the best argument wins" in philosophy. Certain philosophical views, for example, extremely controversial ethical positions, may be intolerable and impossible to take seriously as contributions to ethical discussion, irrespective of their argumentative merits. As a case study of this metaphilosophical issue, the article discusses David Benatar's recent thesis that it is, for everyone, harmful to exist. It is argued that ethical and cultural "unthinkabilities" set limits to philosophical reasoning that even the most insightful arguments cannot transcend. 相似文献
74.
Maurice A. Finocchiaro 《Argumentation》1997,11(4):393-410
This is a critical examination of Antoine Arnauld's Logic or the Art of Thinking (1662), commonly known as the Port-Royal Logic. Rather than reading this work from the viewpoint of post-Fregean formal logic or the viewpoint of seventeenth-century intellectual history, I approach it with the aim of exploring its relationship to that contemporary field which may be labeled informal logic and/or argumentation theory. It turns out that the Port-Royal Logic is a precursor of this current field, or conversely, that this field may be said to be in the same tradition. 相似文献
75.
E. T. Feteris 《Argumentation》1997,11(3):355-376
This essay discusses the developments and trends of research in legalargumentation of the last 25 years. The essay starts with a survey of thevarious approaches which can be distinguished: the logical approach, therhetorical approach, and the dialogical approach. Then it identifies varioustopics in the research, which constitute the various components of aresearch programme of legal argumentation: the philosophical component, thetheoretical component, the reconstruction component, the empiricalcomponent, and the practical component. It concludes with a discussion ofthe main trends in the research of the last 25 years. 相似文献
76.
This paper presents and discusses several methods for reasoning from inconsistent knowledge bases. A so-called argued consequence relation, taking into account the existence of consistent arguments in favour of a conclusion and the absence of consistent arguments in favour of its contrary, is particularly investigated. Flat knowledge bases, i.e., without any priority between their elements, are studied under different inconsistency-tolerant consequence relations, namely the so-called argumentative, free, universal, existential, cardinality-based, and paraconsistent consequence relations. The syntax-sensitivity of these consequence relations is studied. A companion paper is devoted to the case where priorities exist between the pieces of information in the knowledge base. 相似文献
77.
David Hitchcock 《Argumentation》1992,6(2):251-270
Relevance is a triadic relation between an item, an outcome or goal, and a situation. Causal relevance consists in an item's ability to help produce an outcome in a situation. Epistemic relevance, a distinct concept, consists in the ability of a piece of information (or a speech act communicating or requesting a piece of information) to help achieve an epistemic goal in a situation. It has this ability when it can be ineliminably combined with other at least potentially accurate information to achieve the goal. The relevance of a conversational contribution, premiss relevance and conclusion relevance are species of epistemic relevance thus defined. The conception of premiss relevance which results provides a basis for determining when the various arguments ad called fallacies of relevance are indeed irrelevant. In particular, an ad verecundiam appeal is irrelevant if the authority cited lacks expertise in a cognitive domain to which the conclusion belongs, the authority does not exercise its expertise in coming to endorse the conclusion, or the conclusion does not belong to a cognitive domain; otherwise the ad verecundiam is relevant. 相似文献
78.
Nancy Struever 《Argumentation》1992,6(3):337-347
This paper suggests a specific contribution of contemporary history and philosophy of science to the theory of history. The pragmatic in the technical sense of analysis of use and user aspects of scientific discourse, and the pragmatist, in the sense of a focus on utility as canon, dimensions of modern philosophy of science illumine the structure of historical inquiry. Simply put, the structure of writing produced by the historical discipline is argumentative. Further, the nature of the historical argumentative strategies is best described by reference to classical rhetorical, to topical modes of argument. 相似文献
79.
In this article it is pointed out what kind of rules for communication and argumentation are required in order to make it possible to resolve disputes in an orderly way. In section 2, Gricean maxims and Searlean speech act conditions are integrated in such a way that five general rules for communication can be formulated. In section 3, starting from Lewis's definition of convention, it is argued that the interactional effect of accepting is conventionally linked with the complex communicative act complex of argumentation. In section 4, the rules for argumentation are placed in a dialogical perspective. 相似文献
80.
Argumentation logicians have recognized a specter of relativism to haunt their philosophy of argument. However, their attempts
to dispel pernicious relativism by invoking notions of a universal audience or a community of model interlocutors have not
been entirely successful. In fact, their various discussions of a universal audience invoke the context-eschewing formalism
of Kant’s categorical imperative. Moreover, they embrace the Kantian method for resolving the antinomies that continually
vacillates between opposing extremes – here between a transcendent universal audience and a context-embedded particular audience.
This tack ironically restores the very external mediation they thought to obviate in their aim to ‘dethrone’ the absolutism
and totalitarianism of formal logic with a democratic turn to audience adherence, the acceptability of premises and inferential
links, and a contextual, or participant-relative, notion of cogency. 相似文献