全文获取类型
收费全文 | 293篇 |
免费 | 27篇 |
专业分类
320篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 4篇 |
2022年 | 2篇 |
2021年 | 1篇 |
2020年 | 6篇 |
2019年 | 12篇 |
2018年 | 9篇 |
2017年 | 25篇 |
2016年 | 14篇 |
2015年 | 10篇 |
2014年 | 14篇 |
2013年 | 33篇 |
2012年 | 10篇 |
2011年 | 6篇 |
2010年 | 6篇 |
2009年 | 15篇 |
2008年 | 14篇 |
2007年 | 14篇 |
2006年 | 15篇 |
2005年 | 19篇 |
2004年 | 10篇 |
2003年 | 10篇 |
2002年 | 12篇 |
2001年 | 11篇 |
2000年 | 14篇 |
1999年 | 7篇 |
1998年 | 7篇 |
1997年 | 5篇 |
1995年 | 2篇 |
1994年 | 4篇 |
1993年 | 1篇 |
1992年 | 2篇 |
1991年 | 3篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
1987年 | 2篇 |
排序方式: 共有320条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
11.
Daniel D. Hutto 《International Journal of Philosophical Studies》2013,21(4):561-567
ABSTRACTAnalytic philosophy is often associated with a physicalistic naturalism that privileges natural-scientific modes of explanation. Nevertheless there has since the 1980s been a heterodox, somewhat subterranean trend within analytic philosophy that seeks to articulate a more expansive, ‘non-reductive‘ conception of nature. This trend can be traced back to P.F. Strawson’s 1985 book Skepticism and Naturalism: Some Varieties. However, Strawson has long been ignored in the literature around ‘soft naturalism’ – especially in comparison to John McDowell. One of the reasons for this is that Strawson’s account of soft naturalism is not often viewed as particularly plausible – it has come in for heavy criticism from the likes of Sebastian Gardner (2007) and Robert Stern (2003). In this paper, I argue that Strawson’s soft naturalism ought to be re-assessed: that his critics can be refuted, and that his naturalism remains a compelling alternative to the likes of McDowell’s. I attempt this through a ‘radicalisation’ of the modest Strawson’s position, demonstrating that his naturalism has implicit in it something like Marx’s conception of human ‘species-being’. 相似文献
12.
Experimental philosophy is often presented as a new movement that avoids many of the difficulties that face traditional philosophy. This article distinguishes two views of experimental philosophy: a narrow view in which philosophers conduct empirical investigations of intuitions, and a broad view which says that experimental philosophy is just the colocation in the same body of (i) philosophical naturalism and (ii) the actual practice of cognitive science. These two positions are rarely clearly distinguished in the literature about experimental philosophy, both pro and con. The article argues, first, that the broader view is the only plausible one; discussions of experimental philosophy should recognize that the narrow view is a caricature of experimental philosophy as it is currently done. It then shows both how objections to experimental philosophy are transformed and how positive recommendations can be provided by adopting a broad conception of experimental philosophy. 相似文献
13.
Carl B. Sachs 《Metaphilosophy》2013,44(5):682-707
Rorty regards himself as furthering the project of the Enlightenment by separating Enlightenment liberalism from Enlightenment rationalism. To do so, he rejects the very need for explicit metaphysical theorizing. Yet his commitments to naturalism, nominalism, and the irreducibility of the normative come from the metaphysics of Wilfrid Sellars. Rorty's debt to Sellars is concealed by his use of Davidsonian arguments against the scheme/content distinction and the nonsemantic concept of truth. The Davidsonian arguments are used for Deweyan ends: to advance secularization and anti‐authoritarianism. However, Rorty's conflation of theology and metaphysics conceals the possibility of post‐theological metaphysics. The key distinction lies between “metaphysics” and “Metaphysics.” The former provisionally models the relations between different vocabularies; the latter continues theology by other means. Sellars shows how to do metaphysics without Metaphysics. This approach complements Rorty's prioritization of cultural politics over ontology and his vision of Enlightenment liberalism without Enlightenment rationalism. 相似文献
14.
Zachary Simpson 《Zygon》2013,48(2):405-427
In response to recent theories of emergence which attempt to examine system dynamics and the evolution of complexity from physics to biology and consciousness, a number of theologians have attempted to distill religious insights from a philosophical concept of emergence. Recent work by Terrence Deacon, however, which emphasizes constraint and a process understanding of complexity, undercuts significant features in emergent theologies, namely the privileging of certain loci within emergent complexity, an emphasis on efficient causation, and, theologically, an agential and personal God. The final section of this article, using the example of Navaho religious thought, argues that other religious insights which centralize norm‐ativity, global features of complexity, and are depersonalized, have greater traction with current scientific theories of emergence. 相似文献
15.
Josh A. Reeves 《Theology & Science》2013,11(4):403-419
“Natural philosophy” is an important term from the history of science because it was used to describe the study of nature during medieval and early modern Europe. This article gives an overview of the history of natural philosophy, since the use and eventual disuse of the term helps one to understand the emergence of modern science. Following a suggestion by the historian of science Peter Dear, I argue that the term deserves to be rehabilitated because it draws attention to the complexities of scientific theorizing. The article concludes with an argument that the field of science and religion should be seen as an updated version of natural philosophy. 相似文献
16.
Mason Cash 《Philosophical explorations》2013,16(2):93-119
Many now accept the thesis that norms are somehow constitutively involved in people's contentful intentional states. I distinguish three versions of this normative thesis that disagree about the type of norms constitutively involved. Are they objective norms of correctness, subjective norms of rationality, or intersubjective norms of social practices? I show the advantages of the third version, arguing that it improves upon the other two versions, as well as incorporating their principal insights. I then defend it against two serious challenges: (1) If content is constituted by others' normative judgments, how can content be causally efficacious? (2) This account appears to make having contentful thoughts a matter of people having contentful thoughts about your thoughts. That appears to be viciously circular and so can't be naturalistic. 相似文献
17.
Anthony F. Beavers 《Metaphilosophy》2002,33(1&2):70-82
18.
Jerome A. Stone 《Zygon》2003,38(4):783-800
Abstract. Religious naturalism encompasses thinkers from Baruch Spinoza, George Santayana, John Dewey, Henry Nelson Wieman, and Ralph Burhoe to recent writers. I offer a generic definition of religious naturalism and then outline my own version, the “minimalist vision of transcendence.” Many standard issues in the science‐and‐religion dialogue are seen to fade in significance for religious naturalism. I make suggestions for our understanding of science, including the importance of transcognitive abilities, the need for a revised notion of rationality as an alternative to extreme versions of postmodernism, the value of rational dissensus, and the education of appreciation. Finally, I suggest ways to interpret the religious traditions of the world by religious naturalism. 相似文献
19.
Bob Plant 《The Journal of religious ethics》2006,34(4):533-559
In The History of Sexuality, Foucault maintains that “Western man has become a confessing animal” (1990, 59), thus implying that “man” was not always such a creature. On a related point, Wittgenstein suggests that “man is a ceremonial animal” (1996, 67); here the suggestion is that human beings are, by their very nature, ritualistically inclined. In this paper I examine this crucial difference in emphasis, first by reconstructing Foucault's “genealogy” of confession, and subsequently by exploring relevant facets of Wittgenstein's later thinking. While there are significant correlations between Foucault and Wittgenstein, an important disparity emerges in relation to the question of the “natural.” By critically analyzing this, I show how Wittgenstein's minimal naturalism provides an important corrective to Foucault's more extravagant claims. By implication, we see why any radical relativist, historicist, and/or constructivist position becomes untenable on Wittgensteinian grounds, even though Wittgenstein himself is often read as promoting such views. 相似文献
20.
Joseph Rouse 《Journal for General Philosophy of Science》1998,29(1):71-122
This survey of major developments in North American philosophy of science begins with the mid-1960s consolidation of the disciplinary
synthesis of internalist history and philosophy of science (HPS) as a response to criticisms of logical empiricism. These
developments are grouped for discussion under the following headings: historical metamethodologies, scientific realisms, philosophies
of the special sciences, revivals of empiricism, cognitivist naturalisms, social epistemologies, feminist theories of science,
studies of experiment and the disunity of science, and studies of science as practice and culture. A unifying theme of the
survey is the relation between historical metamethodologists and scientific realists, which dominated philosophical work in
the late 1970s. I argue that many of the alternative cognitive naturalisms, social epistemologies, and feminist theories that
have been proposed can be understood as analogues to the differences between metamethodological theories of scientific rationality
and realist accounts of successful reference to real causal processes. Recent work on experiment, scientific practice, and
the culture of science may, however, challenge the underlying conception of the field according to which realism and historical
rationalism (or their descendants) are the important alternatives available, and thus may take philosophy of science in new
directions.
This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date. 相似文献