全文获取类型
收费全文 | 589篇 |
免费 | 50篇 |
国内免费 | 25篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 9篇 |
2022年 | 5篇 |
2021年 | 8篇 |
2020年 | 34篇 |
2019年 | 43篇 |
2018年 | 30篇 |
2017年 | 38篇 |
2016年 | 35篇 |
2015年 | 14篇 |
2014年 | 40篇 |
2013年 | 132篇 |
2012年 | 22篇 |
2011年 | 17篇 |
2010年 | 8篇 |
2009年 | 20篇 |
2008年 | 18篇 |
2007年 | 25篇 |
2006年 | 15篇 |
2005年 | 37篇 |
2004年 | 23篇 |
2003年 | 19篇 |
2002年 | 19篇 |
2001年 | 10篇 |
2000年 | 9篇 |
1999年 | 8篇 |
1998年 | 8篇 |
1997年 | 5篇 |
1996年 | 6篇 |
1995年 | 1篇 |
1994年 | 2篇 |
1993年 | 1篇 |
1991年 | 1篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
1982年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有664条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
661.
662.
Hildegunn Marie Tønnessen Schuff 《Journal of Contemporary Religion》2019,34(3):529-549
ABSTRACTAlthough dance is a common religious expression, its place in the Christian tradition has been contested. In modern Protestant Norway, dance has mostly been considered irrelevant to church life or even sinful. In recent decades, however, dance has become increasingly common in Norwegian churches. The present analysis of empirical data on dance in Christian settings in contemporary Norway is based on participant observation and interviews. While younger dancers (born after 1990) consider it natural to dance in church, and are usually welcome to do so, older participants have met significant resistance. When dancing, dancers find personal meaning (wellbeing, processing emotions and life events), social meaning (communication, belonging), and religious meaning (contact with God, prayer, growth). Dance emerges as a part of lived religion that clearly highlights how bodies matter, and how spiritualities are gendered, in this contribution to understanding the embodied dimensions of religion. 相似文献
663.
Francis Khek Gee Lim 《Journal of Contemporary Religion》2020,35(1):13-30
ABSTRACTMuch academic writing on religion and development tends to focus on the values, beliefs, and modes of operation of religious organizations to examine whether religion contributes ethically to development. A problem with such an approach is its disregard of the contested and evolving nature of religious participation in development in broader national and global contexts. What constitutes ethical religious contribution to development? How can we study the question sociologically? To answer these two questions, I develop Roland Robertson’s notion of the global field to present a framework for analyzing the dynamic interaction between religion and development ethics. In terms of methodological contribution, the framework proposed here prompts us dynamically to contextualize the issue of religious development ethics with reference to four components that make up the global field: the religious agent, the national society, the global civil society, and the global discourse on wellbeing and development. This means that, from an analytical perspective, what is proper or ethical in religious development ethics should not be construed in absolute terms, but in terms of degree and variation. I demonstrate the usefulness of such a contextual approach by drawing on research on ‘GMV’ (pseudonym for an international Christian medical professional services group actively engaged in community development) in China and examining the relationship between religious NGOs, the party-state, and evolving discursive practice of development in the country. 相似文献
664.
David Novak 《The Journal of religious ethics》2012,40(2):281-295
In his 2001 book, With the Grain of the Universe, Stanley Hauerwas has made an extended case for Karl Barth as the model for how to do Christian ethics, and for Reinhold Niebuhr as the model for how not to do it. Though Barth's closer and deeper theological connection to the Christian tradition appeals to a Jewish traditionalist by analogy, nevertheless, Niebuhr's approach to social ethics, based as it is on a version of natural law, is of greater appeal. That is because it is more philosophically arguable in a secular society and culture, and because it is more politically effective there. It is what made Niebuhr a more effective opponent of Nazism than was Barth. Also, Niebuhr's version of natural law is not a christianized version of Stoic natural law teaching but, rather, a profound use of the biblical prohibition of idolatry, having heretofore unnoticed affinities with rabbinic developments of that prohibition. 相似文献