Classical test theory based and factor analytic structural models for analyzing change: A note on differences and similarities

This note is concerned with differences and similarities between structural models for analyzing change, which are conceptualized within two different modelling traditions: the one based on the classical test theory, and that within the factor-analytic approach. It is shown that these two possibilities lead to models for studying change, which are indistinguishable when using for data analytic purposes structural modeling programs, such as LISREL, EQS, COSAN, LISCOMP, RAMONA, EzPATH, SAS PROC CALIS. The reason for this data-analytic equivalence of the two conceptually different types of models is the confounding of their differences in the corresponding implied covariance matrix structures.     

Constructing measures with maximum reliability

The scoring of response vectors to give maximum test-retest correlation is investigated. Simple sufficiency arguments show that the form of the best scores is very restricted. A general method is given for finding the best scores, deriving the best scores for the normal factor model, and showing by calculation of several particular cases that for a standard model for binary response it is easy to approximate the best scores.     

The concept of general expectancy in various personality dispositions

It is argued that the concept of general expectancy is a central common core of personality dispositions related to achievement areas. This hypothesis of common core was investigated with factor analysis and cluster analysis. 166 advanced teacher students participated, and were scored on the following relevant personality dispositions motive to seek success, motive to avoid failure, global and academic self-esteem, self-efficacy, attributional style, depression, and defensiveness. The hypothesis was supported in that factor analysis gave a general bipolar expectancy factor, and cluster analysis resulted in two clusters, one corresponding to positive expectancy and the other to negative expectancy.     

Comment on fitting MA time series by structural equation models

In a recent paper by van Buuren (1997) it is concluded that parameter estimates in pure moving-average (MA) models, obtained by software for fitting structural equation models (SEMs), are biased and inefficient. In this comment it is shown that this negative finding may be due to a particular feature of van Buuren's simulation experiment. A modified procedure for fitting MA models by means of SEM software is proposed, and some of its implications are discussed.     

Estimation for the multiple factor model when data are missing

A maximum likelihood method of estimating the parameters of the multiple factor model when data are missing from the sample is presented. A Monte Carlo study compares the method with 5 heuristic methods of dealing with the problem. The present method shows some advantage in accuracy of estimation over the heuristic methods but is considerably more costly computationally.This paper is based on the author's doctoral dissertation at the Department of Psychology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The author gratefully acknowledges the aid of Drs. Robert Bohrer, Charles Lewis, Robert Linn, Maurice Tatsuoka, and Ledyard Tucker.     

Statistical aspects of a three-mode factor analysis model

A special case of Bloxom's version of Tucker's three-mode model is developed statistically. A distinction is made between modes in terms of whether they are fixed or random. Parameter matrices are associated with the fixed modes, while no parameters are associated with the mode representing random observation vectors. The identification problem is discussed, and unknown parameters of the model are estimated by a weighted least squares method based upon a Gauss-Newton algorithm. A goodness-of-fit statistic is presented. An example based upon self-report and peer-report measures of personality shows that the model is applicable to real data. The model represents a generalization of Thurstonian factor analysis; weighted least squares estimators and maximum likelihood estimators of the factor model can be obtained using the proposed theory.This investigation was supported in part by a Research Scientist Development Award (K02-DA00017) and a research grant (DA01070) from the U. S. Public Health Service. The very helpful comments of several anonymous reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.     

Scale freeness in factor analysis

The notion of scale freeness does not seem to have been well understood in the factor analytic literature. It has been believed that if the loss function that is minimized to obtain estimates of the parameters in the factor model is scale invariant, then the estimates are scale free. It is shown that scale invariance of the loss function is neither a necessary nor a sufficient condition for scale freeness. A theorem that ensures scale freeness in the orthogonal factor model is given in this paper.The authors are grateful for the suggestions of the referees.     

The principal components of mixed measurement level multivariate data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features

A method is discussed which extends principal components analysis to the situation where the variables may be measured at a variety of scale levels (nominal, ordinal or interval), and where they may be either continuous or discrete. There are no restrictions on the mix of measurement characteristics and there may be any pattern of missing observations. The method scales the observations on each variable within the restrictions imposed by the variable's measurement characteristics, so that the deviation from the principal components model for a specified number of components is minimized in the least squares sense. An alternating least squares algorithm is discussed. An illustrative example is given.Copies of this paper and of the associated PRINCIPALS program may be obtained by writing to Forrest W. Young, Psychometric Laboratory, Davie Hall 013-A, Chapel Hill, NC 27514.     

中学生特质焦虑与其影响因素的模型建构

该研究旨在建构特质焦虑与其影响因素的关系模型。文中提出了影响特质焦虑的三个潜变量 ,分别是人格、学业压力、环境。其中人格包括自卑倾向和内向性格两个指示变量 ,学校压力包括学业压力和人际困扰两个指示变量 ,环境包括不良社会影响、学校适应不良、身体虚弱和父母不良教养方式等指示变量。研究结果发现 ,人格和学校压力直接导致特质焦虑 ,环境通过对人格和学校压力产生影响而间接影响特质焦虑 ,同时 ,人格对学校压力产生影响