全文获取类型
收费全文 | 326篇 |
免费 | 17篇 |
国内免费 | 4篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 12篇 |
2022年 | 5篇 |
2021年 | 7篇 |
2020年 | 20篇 |
2019年 | 27篇 |
2018年 | 21篇 |
2017年 | 26篇 |
2016年 | 19篇 |
2015年 | 22篇 |
2014年 | 17篇 |
2013年 | 42篇 |
2012年 | 16篇 |
2011年 | 2篇 |
2010年 | 5篇 |
2009年 | 11篇 |
2008年 | 4篇 |
2007年 | 4篇 |
2006年 | 8篇 |
2005年 | 9篇 |
2004年 | 5篇 |
2003年 | 19篇 |
2002年 | 13篇 |
2001年 | 6篇 |
2000年 | 3篇 |
1999年 | 8篇 |
1998年 | 2篇 |
1997年 | 3篇 |
1996年 | 1篇 |
1995年 | 1篇 |
1994年 | 1篇 |
1993年 | 2篇 |
1992年 | 1篇 |
1991年 | 2篇 |
1988年 | 3篇 |
排序方式: 共有347条查询结果,搜索用时 312 毫秒
31.
Ernest Sosa 《Metaphilosophy》2003,34(5):553-562
Abstract: An exposition and discussion of Chisholm's “epistemic principles.” These are compared with relevant views of Wilfrid Sellars and Richard Foley. A further comparison, with the approach favored by Descartes, is argued to throw light on the status of such principles. 相似文献
32.
S.E. Marshall 《Metaphilosophy》2003,34(1-2):174-177
In response to Miranda Fricker's advocacy of a virtue of 'reflexive critical openness', I emphasise the importance of other virtues, such as loyalty, in evaluating an agent's response to testimony, and I query Fricker's claim that in certain circumstances agents can lack a means to correct their faulty evaluations of another's testimony 相似文献
33.
Two notions of memory are studied both syntactically and semantically: memory of past beliefs and memory of past actions. The analysis is carried out in a basic temporal logic framework enriched with beliefs and actions. 相似文献
34.
35.
The demand that epistemic support be explicated as rational compulsion has consistently undermined the dialogue between theology and science. Rational compulsion entails too restrictive a form of epistemic support for most scientific theorizing, let alone interdisciplinary dialogue. This essay presents a less restrictive form of epistemic support, explicated not as rational compulsion but as explanatory power. Once this notion of epistemic support is developed, a genuinely productive interdisciplinary dialogue between theology and science becomes possible. This essay closes by sketching how the Big Bang model from cosmology and the Christian doctrine of Creation can be viewed as supporting each other. 相似文献
36.
Measures of epistemic utility are used by formal epistemologists to make determinations of epistemic betterness among cognitive states. The Brier rule is the most popular choice (by far) among formal epistemologists for such a measure. In this paper, however, we show that the Brier rule is sometimes seriously wrong about whether one cognitive state is epistemically better than another. In particular, there are cases where an agent gets evidence that definitively eliminates a false hypothesis (and the probabilities assigned to the other hypotheses stay in the same ratios), but where the Brier rule says that things have become epistemically worse. Along the way to this ‘elimination experiment’ counter-example to the Brier rule as a measure of epistemic utility, we identify several useful monotonicity principles for epistemic betterness. We also reply to several potential objections to this counter-example. 相似文献
37.
Jaroslav Peregrin 《Metaphilosophy》2016,47(2):251-263
The followers of Wilfrid Sellars are often divided into “right” and “left” Sellarsians, according to whether they believe, in Mark Lance's words, that “linguistic roles constitutive of meaning and captured by dot quoted words are ‘normative all the way down.’” The present article anatomizes this division and argues that it is not easy to give it a nontrivial sense. In particular, the article argues that it is not really possible to construe it as a controversy related to ontology, and goes on to argue that it is also not easy to construe it as one concerning the translatability of the normative idiom into the non‐normative one. The conclusion is that the only coherent interpretation of this disagreement is as a disagreement about the possibility and desirability of assuming a standpoint “inside” our linguistic practices. 相似文献
38.
Sarah von der Mühlen Sebastian Schmid Elisabeth Marie Schmidt Kirsten Berthold 《Thinking & reasoning》2016,22(2):221-249
The ability to evaluate scientific claims and evidence is an important aspect of scientific literacy and requires various epistemic competences. Readers spontaneously validate presented information against their knowledge and beliefs but differ in their ability to strategically evaluate the soundness of informal arguments. The present research investigated how students of psychology, compared to scientists working in psychology, evaluate informal arguments. Using a think-aloud procedure, we identified the specific strategies students and scientists apply when judging the plausibility of arguments and classifying common argumentation fallacies. Results indicate that students, compared to scientists, have difficulties forming these judgements and base them on intuition and opinion rather than the internal consistency of arguments. Our findings are discussed using the mental model theory framework. Although introductory students validate scientific information against their knowledge and beliefs, their judgements are often erroneous, in part because their use of strategy is immature. Implications for systematic trainings of epistemic competences are discussed. 相似文献
39.
40.