Epistemic luck and the generality problem

Epistemic luck has been the focus of much discussion recently. Perhaps the most general knowledge-precluding type is veritic luck, where a belief is true but might easily have been false. Veritic luck has two sources, and so eliminating it requires two distinct conditions for a theory of knowledge. I argue that, when one sets out those conditions properly, a solution to the generality problem for reliabilism emerges.

Common knowledge of payoff uncertainty in games

Using epistemic logic, we provide a non-probabilistic way to formalise payoff uncertainty, that is, statements such as ‘player i has approximate knowledge about the utility functions of player j.’ We show that on the basis of this formalisation common knowledge of payoff uncertainty and rationality (in the sense of excluding weakly dominated strategies, due to Dekel and Fudenberg (1990)) characterises a new solution concept we have called ‘mixed iterated strict weak dominance.’     

攻击行为社会信息加工模型与道德领域理论的整合

儿童攻击行为研究中Dodge等人提出的社会信息加工模型,强调社会交互作用情境下个体的信息加工过程与后来的社会行为之间的联系,对于信息加工所依据的数据库则缺乏系统的阐述。领域理论源于对道德认知的思考,将个体的社会知识分为道德、常规和个人三个领域,强调个体在领域认同标准和领域混合事件推理上的差异。Arsenio和Lemerise在情绪与社会信息加工模型整合的基础上,提出借鉴领域理论来说明数据库的内部结构以及其中的社会知识对于信息加工的影响。这些整合体现了认知和情绪在社会行为加工和决策过程中的交互作用,有利于说明存储在长时记忆中的社会知识之间的联系及作用,引发了对各种形式的内部心理成分的理论思考和多个实证研究方向,也为心理研究其他方面的整合工作提供了值得借鉴的研究思路     

Predicting Health-related Quality of Life: Testing the Contextual Model Using Structural Equation Modeling

This study aims to investigate the utility of the Contextual Model of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) to explain the relationship among the domains of HRQOL with a diverse, population-based sample of breast cancer survivors (BCS). We employed a cross-sectional design to investigate HRQOL among 703 multiethnic, population-based BCS. The study methodology was guided by the Contextual Model of HRQOL. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was conducted to assess the hypothesized model. SEM identified significant relationships among the bio-psychological domain (general health status, cancer-related factors, and psychological factors), the cultural-socio-ecological domain (health care satisfaction, socio-ecological factor, and socio-economic status), and HRQOL. The best fitting model indicates direct pathways from ‘general health status’, ‘years since diagnosis’, ‘health care satisfaction’ and ‘socio-ecological factor’ to ‘HRQOL’ variables. Additionally, ‘socio-ecological factor’ and ‘socio-economic status’ variables were indirectly associated with HRQOL through ‘general health status’. Findings suggest that the Contextual Model of HRQOL adds valid factors to explain overall HRQOL and increases our understanding of the socio-ecological dimensions predicting HRQOL outcomes. The revelation of inter-relations among the dimensions of HRQOL may inform the translational and clinical utility of the HRQOL construct.

直觉对内隐学习优势效应的特异性贡献

已有人工语法的内隐学习研究中一个关键的问题是被试在不同指导语诱发下究竟形成了什么样的知识表征？实验借助结构知识的测量方式, 采用记忆和规则探索两种指导语, 考察了两组被试所获得的深层知识表征(结构知识)。结果发现：(1)在记忆指导语条件下, 被试获得了语法规则; (2)直觉在记忆指导语条件下贡献突出, 表现出特异性。该结果表明记忆指导语引发了被试基于直觉区分人工语法规则的内隐学习优势效应。     

工作设计对知识型员工和体力工作者的差异化影响：一个现场准实验研究

虽然泰勒主义似乎已被工作设计所替代, 但是近来有些学者们注意到工作设计并未起到预期的效果。该研究旨在探讨工作类型作为一个重要的调节变量, 影响着这两种观点的适用性。通过一个纵向现场准实验设计研究, 结果证实了工作类型的调节作用, 即工作丰富化对知识型员工和体力工作者工作产出的影响存在显著差异。这一结果表明, 泰勒主义和工作设计思想并无优劣之分。该文的研究结果对人力资源管理实践的发展, 具有一定的现实指导意义。     

国外关于问题解决的研究及其教学意义

提高学生解决问题能力已经成为现代教育的一个重要目标。问题解决就是由一定情境引起的,按照一定的目标,应用各种认知活动、技能等,经过一系列思维操作,使问题得以解决的过程。本文综述了问题解决的过程模型,影响问题解决的心理因素,并寻找其教学意义,以期给当前我国教育与教学改革提供参考。     

计算机化自适应测验在认知诊断中的应用

作为认知诊断与计算机化自适应测验相结合的产物, 认知诊断计算机化自适应测验(Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing, CD-CAT)是对被试知识状态的自适应。它既有传统CAT所面临的普遍性问题, 也有在认知诊断中遇到的特殊问题：由于认知诊断中涉及属性这一概念, CD-CAT与传统CAT有很大的差别。本文紧紧围绕属性引起的差异, 分别从认知诊断模型、题库建设、起始规则、选题策略、被试知识状态估计和终止规则等几部分详细介绍CD-CAT的研究进展和存在的问题。     

基于多层面模型的教学效能感量表

运用层面理论方法,在参照已有研究的基础上,对10名中学教师进行了开放式访谈,结合已有研究和访谈结果,设计了映射语句,根据层面元素组合,设计项目,编制了教学效能感量表。对200名中学教师进行初测收回有效问卷162份,运用SSA分析技术,对项目质量做了分析,对部分项目进行了删减,并修改了映射语句,再对530名中学教师进行正式施测,收回有效问卷505份,运用SSA和验证性因素分析技术对量表的构想效度进行了检验,发现量表的信、效度较高,量表符合心理测量学的要求,并证明教学效能感结构为二层面雷达图结构。     

The Knowledge Argument against Physicalism: Its Proponents and Its Opponents

The knowledge argument usually takes the form of a thought experiment where the subject, having some psychological deficiency, lacks any introspective data to derive the knowledge of her experience. Most defenders of the knowledge argument see the argument as both a support of dualism and an objection to any full-blooded form of physicalism. However, this paper argues that the knowledge argument against physicalism may be directed, in an exactly parallel form, against reductive dualism; moreover, although most physicalists who are the opponents of the knowledge argument do not give any convincing response to the knowledge argument, some kinds of physicalism can live with the knowledge argument.