医师知识结构和思维方式与肺血栓栓塞症诊断

肺血栓栓塞症是常见的临床病症,因其临床表现多样,易发生误诊漏诊而导致较高的病死率。但“凡事预则立,不预则废”,充分掌握肺血栓栓塞症的知识、以正确的思维方式引导临床诊疗可以有效减少和避免误诊漏诊。     

解读2009年GINA——5岁及5岁以下儿童哮喘诊断与管理

2009年5月,全球哮喘防治创议组织（GINA）发布了“Global Strategy for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma in Children 5 Years and Younger（5岁及5岁以下儿童哮喘诊断和管理的全球策略”。这是由GINA执行委员会所组织的儿科专家组,根据当前所能得到的循证医学证据为基础,并且考虑到5岁及5岁以下儿童哮喘管理所面临的特殊挑战（包括诊断困难、药物和药物输出装置的有效性和安全性、缺乏在该年龄段新疗法的数据等）,专门针对这个年龄组的儿童,所提出的哮喘诊断和管理方面的报告。     

复杂胫骨平台骨折处理的临床决策

复杂胫骨平台骨折处理相当困难,治疗上存在着一系列矛盾,准确的骨折分型和软组织损伤情况评估,合理的手术入路和手术时机选择,重视复位、固定方式和方法及软组织保护,双下肢同时消毒包扎为术中快速的体位转换提供了方便,一系列临床决策极大地提高了复杂胫骨平台骨折的治疗水平。     

新形势下医院药学的困境与发展

全面分析在当前新的形势下医院药学发展处在转型期所面临的实际困难。正确认识目前医院药剂科在人才队伍建设和知识结构上存在的不足,以及自身拥有的专业技术优势等。明确今后工作的重点在于深入临床贴近患者,向临床药学服务方向发展,同时不断提高临床药学科研水平,促进医院药学事业更高、更快发展。     

腰腿痛患者现病史的客观采集及其评价

腰腿痛患者的现病史采集比较困难,临床上经常引发混乱,甚至会被忽略.作者根据临床经验总结了一套相时系统和客观的分析思路.借此启发和提示临床医生临诊分析的主观能动性.作者还通过对现病史采集在医学发展史上的地位变化的回顾,提出了现代临床医学对患者症状特征进行归纳分析的重要性.     

Collaborative Helping: A Practice Framework for Family-Centered Services

This article offers a framework for collaborative family-centered practice that can reinvigorate our work with families who have not responded to more traditional approaches. Collaborative Helping is grounded in family-centered principles that include: striving for cultural curiosity, believing in resourcefulness, working in partnership, and making our work more accountable to the clients we serve. The article introduces collaborative inquiry as an organizing metaphor for clinical practice and offers a five-step practice framework with clinical illustrations and sample questions. The framework draws from appreciative inquiry, motivational interviewing, the signs of safety approach to child protection work, and solution-focused and narrative therapies.     

Cognitive–Behavioral-Interpersonal Scenarios: Interformulator Reliability and Convergent Validity

Although a clinical case formulation can help focus treatment, little is known about the reliability and convergent validity of independently generated, cognitive–behavioral or cognitive–interpersonal formulations. Using videotapes of a semi-structured interview, pairs of clinicians independently formulated 2–3 cognitive–behavioral–interpersonal scenarios (CBISs) on each of 4 women with mood or comorbid mood and anxiety disorders. Ten licensed psychologists then rated each CBIS on 15 dimensions involving cognition, affect, symptoms, and interpersonal functioning. Reliability of the mean ratings (aggregated over the 10 raters) was >.83 for all dimensions. The set of CBISs formulated by a clinician for a patient generally demonstrated good convergent (same patient/different formulator) and discriminant (different patient/same or different formulator) validity on three factor-analytically derived general dimensions of depression, anxiety, and interpersonal functioning. Within each of three patients, pairs of formulators generally agreed on the situational components of the CBISs and demonstrated adequate to very good convergent validity of corresponding CBIS content. These results contribute to accumulating evidence for the reliability and validity of clinical scenarios as an idiographic, situation-level case formulation. Such formulations can help identify multiple cognitive, behavioral, or interpersonal intervention points in the causal chain leading to distress or dysfunction.     

循证医学及其在心血管疾病中的应用

循证医学作为一门新兴的学科,对医学的研究和实践将产生越来越大的影响。在循证医学的操作过程中,如何正确评价和应用所获得的证据极为重要。在短短的十几年间,循证医学给心血管疾病的临床实践带来了根本的变化。     

Impact of Co-Therapy Teams on Client Outcomes and Therapist Training in Marriage and Family Therapy

This study of 33 student therapists, 402 client systems, and three supervisors tested the efficacy of using student co-therapy teams as an aspect of clinical training in a marriage and family therapy program. This study utilizes both quantitative and qualitative methodology. Two research questions were addressed: “Do different pairings of co-therapists affect client outcomes?” and “Is co-therapy a viable option for a training program?” The results indicate that client outcomes using co-therapy are at least as effective as treatment using one therapist and in some circumstances produce more positive outcomes for both clients and student therapists.