The Compassionate Treatment of Animals

The compassionate treatment of animals has been the focal point of speeches and writings by one of the most influential Buddhist cleric‐scholars on the Tibetan plateau today, Khenpo Tsultrim Lodrö of Larung Buddhist Academy. This essay surveys the Khenpo's broad‐based advocacy for animal welfare and details his discrete appeals to nomads in eastern Tibet to forgo selling livestock for slaughter, to eat a vegetarian diet on religious holidays, to relinquish wearing animal fur, to protect wildlife habitat, and to liberate the lives of animals. I focus on the modernist “this worldly” dimension of his advocacy, calling attention to how Tsultrim Lodrö goes beyond traditional scare tactics that emphasize the karmic effects of negative deeds in future lives and instead invokes compassion by attending to the lived experience and suffering of animals. In doing so, the Khenpo positions Buddhism as a civilizing force in order to reform certain Tibetan customs and mitigate the influence of Chinese modernity and state marketization policies. I argue that his strategy of “reverse orientalism” appropriates state civilizational discourse and reverses its terms.     

Editorial

This article provides a critique of the IWC's traditional focus on anthropocentric conservation in the governance of whaling. It is argued that this position, which relies on accepting the view that we have no direct moral duties to whales, is out of step with the moral status that now tends, in theory and practice, to be granted to animals. More specifically, anthropocentric conservation conflicts with the widespread acceptance, in theory and practice, that non-human animals such as whales have moral standing, that what we do to them matters to them directly. This does not mean that whaling should necessarily be prohibited on ethical grounds, although the animal welfare analysis of whaling sketched in this article does suggest that, on balance, it is difficult to defend morally. Rather, it is being claimed that it is morally objectionable to deny, as the whaling nations do, that the IWC ought to be mandated to consider the welfare implications of whaling.     

Estructura social y conductas de saludo en dos especies de babuinos

Resumen

Independientemente de la proximidad taxonómica, dentro del género Papio existen distintas formas de estructura social. Al mismo tiempo se encuentran diferencias cuantitativas y cualitativas en los repertorios de conducta de las dos especies estudiadas (P. hamadryas y P. cynocephalus), concretamente en los movimientos de salutación.

Se buscó una relación entre dichas estructuras sociales y los respectivos movimientos de saludo que aparecían como característicos de cada especie. La estructura social podría modificarse rápidamente por las presiones ambientales, por lo que serían necesarios nuevos repertorios conductuales en consonancia con el cambio y al mismo tiempo que éste.

Al menos en niveles tan altos de la escala evolutiva, los individuos son capaces de organizar sus conductas según su posición respecto al conjunto del grupo y adecuarlas para acceder a los distintos nichos sociales. Por tanto, no es posible adscribir a la conducta una función exclusiva, sino que dependería de la idiosincrasia individual y de los distintos escalones sociales característicos de una determinada estructura social.     

儿童"假想伙伴"研究及其对教育的启示

“假想伙伴”现象的描述最早出现于20世纪30年代,但把它单独作为一个重要课题进行专门研究却是近二十年的事情。文章回顾了有关假想伙伴研究的历史起源和近期研究成果。文章认为创造假想伙伴是儿童解决适应困难的一个有效手段。分析这一现象对幼儿教育具有很大的启示意义。     

幽门螺杆菌与胃癌关系的研究进展

幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori,Hp)是胃癌的发病因素之一,二者之间的关系非常密切。Hp感染蒙古沙土鼠成功诱发胃癌,在动物实验中直接证实Hp与胃癌发生有关。众多大规模的人群干预研究显示Hp感染可增加胃癌发病率,根除Hp后胃癌的发生有减少趋势;Hp毒力基因尤其是cag致病岛与胃癌发生关系密切。宿主反应基因尤其是前炎症细胞因子与胃癌的危险性增高有关。动物模型显示Hp诱导癌前病变的发生与上皮细胞周期的调控失常、细胞增殖与调亡的失衡相关。     

动物个体差异研究对人格心理学的贡献

动物个体差异的研究与人格心理学的关系已经引起了很多学者的关注。虽然对动物个体差异有许多相关描述,但文章采用一个广泛的工作定义,即动物在不同的情景下一致表现出来的一套相关行为。对动物个体差异的测量需要考虑物种间的可比较性和物种内的充分性。文章从人格结构的探讨,遗传和环境的作用,理解人格与认知、健康的关系,以及个体与环境的匹配等方面讨论和分析了动物个体差异的研究对人格心理学的可能贡献     

Being Conscious of Marc Bekoff: Thinking of Animal Self-Consciousness

The preceding article by Marc Bekoff reveals much about our current understanding of animal self‐consciousness and its implications. It also reveals how much more there is to be said and considered. This response briefly examines animal self‐consciousness from scientific, moral, and theological perspectives. As Bekoff emphasizes, self‐consciousness is not one thing but many. Consequently, our moral relationship to animals is not simply one based on a graded hierarchy of abilities. Furthermore, the complexity of animal self‐awareness can serve as stimulus for thinking about issues of theodicy and soteriology in a broader sense.     

ANIMALS AS KIN: THE RELIGIOUS SIGNIFICANCE OF MARC BEKOFF'S WORK

Abstract. Although the disciplines of religion and science often may seem to be at cross purposes with each other, some individuals are attempting to bridge the gap, particularly with regard to animals. Cognitive ethologist Marc Bekoff, who studies animals in their natural habitat, has addressed in his work the implications of the findings of animal study for religion and ethics. I provide here an overview of some of his most important ideas for the study of religion and animals. Bekoff argues that the differences between humans and animals are primarily ones of degree rather than kind and that our similarities are greater than our differences‐and that this reality should influence our actions. I explore three issues in particular. First, Bekoff's work, with his view of evolution, challenges the traditional Christian hierarchy of beings. Second, this evolutionary connection needs to move us in the direction of modifying our treatment of animals to make it more ethical. Third, our understanding of and relationship with animals can deepen our own spirituality. Applying some of Bekoff's findings to our religious and ethical understandings of and treatment of animals can move us closer to the peaceable kingdom toward which we all strive.