排序方式: 共有44条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
31.
32.
《四书》是先秦的历史文本 ,理学是两宋的时代思潮 ,它们之间存在着历史时代的差异。朱熹将《四书》诠释过程规定为 :先达之言→圣人之意→天地之理 ,就是希望通过“语言———文献”的诠释方法 ,来解决《四书》诠释中历史性与时代性的差别问题。朱熹的《四书》学诠释获得了巨大的成功 ,这不仅是由于他的理学适应了两宋以后思想文化变革发展的时代性需要 ,同时也因为他的《四书》学重新发现了那已经失传的儒学学统。 相似文献
33.
John Sallis 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2013,8(4):641-654
The theme of this essay is expressed in a line from the Dao De Jing: "The great image has no form." The essay shows how this effacement, annulment, or withdrawal of form is realized in ancient Chinese painting (Song and Ming Dynasties) and in the conception of the natural elements to which much of this painting is related. Certain resonances with this effacement of form are identified in the way that recent Continental thought focuses on an effacement of form as it was determined in ancient Greek philosophy. 相似文献
34.
马王堆帛书《系辞》研究 总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1
本文主要研究马王堆帛书《系辞》中几处重要的异文。今本《系辞》中的“象”,帛书作“马”。“马”义同于“数”。《庄子》中说“天地一指也.万物一马也。”此处的“马”。与帛书《系辞》中的“马”同义。今本《系辞》中的“太极”,帛书作“大恒”。恒、常同义,《仪礼》中说“假尔大筮有常。”这个“常”即帛书《系辞》中的“大恒”。亦即《吕氏春秋·大乐》中的“天常”。今本《系辞》云“显诸仁,藏诸用”,帛书作“圣者仁,壮者勇”。儒家学说重视“勇”,《论语·宪问》即有云“仁者必有勇。”帛书《系辞》云“天地之大思日生。”“思”读为“司”,今本作“天地之大德日生。”帛书《系辞》又云“夫易古物定命”,其义同于“乾知大始,坤作成物”。今本《系辞》云“圣人以此洗心”.帛书作“圣人以此佚心”,佚、乐同义,马王堆帛书《五行》云“不安则不乐。不乐则无德。” 相似文献
35.
James Garrison 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》2012,7(3):471
The onto-hermeneutic approach to bentiyong 本体用 championed by Cheng Chung-Ying 成中英 is a valuable addition to comparative philosophy. In his well-honed reading, bentiyong is described as the continuous, integrative substance at the base of things, which becomes known through an ongoing hermeneutic integration and interpretation of reality. However, his use of the English word “substance” to describe bentiyong is problematic, mainly because substance, being without properties and existing without change, cannot be read as part of a hermeneutic process. Luckily, there are resources within the Chinese philosophical tradition that can help in overcoming some of the difficulties in translation presented here. Namely, the way that Zhu Xi 朱熹 approaches ti-yong as a principle (li 理) provides a better and more fittingly discursive basis for expressing the onto-hermeneutic character of bentiyong intended by Cheng, and allows English translation of the term with a firm footing in mainstream Neo-Confucianism. 相似文献
36.
37.
朱熹提出《易》之本义为卜筮的见解,由此对程颐易学和义理学派提出批评。朱熹主张区分《周易》经传,提出易学发展阶段说。通过比较《周易本义》和《周易程氏传》,可见两者之异同。朱熹以象数、卜筮求易理,把义理学派与象数学派统一起来,从而发展了宋代易学。 相似文献
38.
朱的治<易>体会.本文据此考察了朱子治<易>理路:一是对<易>道和<易>书的定位,认为圣人所深见的<易>道不仅仅指<易>的生生之道,而且还涵<易>书本为卜筮而作的本义;二是对治<易>困境的省思,认为因<易>之本义被遮蔽,且<易>道还需经历见得之故,故<易>成为难读的"天书".得出:朱子认定只有达至"此心大段虚明宁静"之境后,方可像圣人一样"深见<易>道之无穷",证成"学<易>无大过"的生命境界. 相似文献
39.
40.
试论朱谦之《周易哲学》中的"情" 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
本文以朱谦之《周易哲学》中“情”这一概念为中心,梳理其对《周易》中“情”的本质、特点和方法的考察,阐明“情”的丰富内涵,评析其本于《周易》而建立和倡导的唯情哲学的意义。朱谦之试图以“情”重建儒家的形而上学,并使古老的《周易》不断涌现出现代的意蕴。 相似文献