《周易》与中国书法关系浅析

作为中国特有的一种艺术形式,中国书法集中体现了以《周易》为代表的中国传统文化的精神内核。它既是一门艺术样式,同时又是中国哲学的一种特有的表现形式,是一种哲学化的艺术。本文从三个方面分析《周易》和中国书法的内在关系:一、《周易》意象思维对汉文字起源的启示。二、《周易》的阴阳思想对中国书法的理论和实践的影响。三、《周易》的变化观念在中国书法中的体现。     

吉备真备与唐代易学东传

吉备真备是日本奈良时期(中国唐代)著名的学者、政治家、军事家,是中日文化交流史上的重要人物。他在唐留学19年,将中国的许多重要典籍带回日本,促进了日本政治制度的建设与完善。同时,有史料证明他也是将易学传入日本的重要人物之一。本文通过日本史料解读唐代易学东传中吉备真备的作用及其对易学中占卜内容的态度等问题。     

骨科疾病诊治中的临床思维

医学哲学是对医学科学成就总的概括,并以此为基础探讨生命活动和病程的一般规律,研究医学科学的思维方式,直至疾病预防、诊断治疗。同时研究辩证规律和范畴在医学科学中的表现,从而指导骨科医师解决在骨科疾病诊治中遇到的诸多问题,并有助于形成正确的临床思维。结合临床工作体会,探讨医学哲学在骨科疾病诊治临床思维中的应用。     

"风水"阴阳哲学思想与察"气"体系研究

阴阳学说认为,一切存在物皆分阴阳,且具有阴阳对待、变化、和合的关系。风水学以《周易》为体,以“气”为核心,阴阳为两翼,在阴阳思想与“生气”思想结合的基础上,按《周易》“近取诸身,远取诸物”的取象方法分别进行阴阳取象,可得出“理气风水立体时空察气体系”和“峦头平面空间察气体系”两大风水体系。     

《周易》阴阳论的层级结构性质

传统中国哲学中的阴阳论一直是学界所关注的一个焦点,但对于该体系所具备确切内涵的各方面、以及由其所结成的整个架构的整体理论性质,却很少有人能深入体察。本文通过对《周易》阴阳论的细致分析,提出该理论作为一种形而上学宇宙论,实则是一个内在含括生命论、差异论与秩序论等三个主要方面,并以其中生命论为根基也是最终目的的层级结构。     

关于八卦与五行结合的根据

对于八卦与五行两种理论体系结合的根据,学界尚未进行深入研究。针对两种理论各自的特点,依据有关的史料,“象”和“四方四季”可能是导致八卦与五行结合的两个原因。不能简单地用阴阳的概念代表八卦,阴阳是五行和八卦两者共同的理论基础。     

Why Logic Doesn‘t Matter in the (Philosophical) Study of Argumentation

Philosophically, the study of argumentation is important because it holds out the prospect of an interpretation of rationality. For this we need to identify a transcendent perspective on the argumentative interaction. We need a normative theory of argumentation that provides an answer to the question: should the hearer accept the argument of the speaker. In this article I argue that formal logic implies a notion of transcendence that is not suitable for the study of argumentation, because, from a logical point of view, argumentation disappears from sight. We should therefore not expect formal logic to provide an interesting interpretation of the rationality intrinsic in argument and discussion.     

Creative reasoning in formal discussion

Systems of formal dialectics articulate methods of conflict resolution. To this end they provide norms to regulate verbal exchanges between the Proponent of a thesis and an Opponent. These regulated exchanges constitute what are known as formal discussions.One may ask what moves, if any, in formal discusions correspond to arguing for or against the thesis. It is claimed that certain moves of the Proponent's are properly designated as arguing for the thesis, and that certain moves of the Opponent purport to criticize the tenability or the relevance of the reasons advanced. Thus the usefulness of formal dialectic systems as models for reasonable argument is vindicated.It is then proposed to make these systems more realistic by incorporating in them a norm of Creative Reasoning that removes the severe restrictions to which the Proponent's arguing was hitherto subject. As a consequence, a certain type of irrelevant reason is no longer automatically excluded. Therefore, it is proposed to extend the Opponent's rights to exert relevance criticism. The new dialectic systems are shown to be strategically equivalent to the original ones. Finally, it is stressed that the Opponent's criticism should not be designated as arguing against the thesis. The Opponent criticizes, but does not argue.     

探析流行病防治的哲学思维

本文以现代医学模式为指导,阐述了辩证思维在流行病学研究领域的应用及其必要性。从系统论和具体问题具体分析论述了传染病和慢性病并重和区别对待的疾控观;通过消除病因和医防一体化以控制流行病。最后得出与哲学思维协调发展是流行病防治基本策略的结论。     

Construction of the Disciplinary,Academic, and Discourse Systems in the Contemporary Chinese Philosophy of Science and Technology: Retrospect and Prospect

A review of the decades of research shows that Chinese philosophy of science and technology, on the strength of carrying forward traditions and blazing new trails, has made progress in the construction of discipline system and development of institutions, teaching materials and periodicals, with deepening the discussion on discipline orientation. In academic system construction, driven by efforts to update the academic framework and deepen research on the philosophy of nature, philosophy of science, philosophy of technology, science, technology and society, as well as other traditional fields, achievements have been made in ethical reflections on high technology, engineering ethics, big data and artificial intelligence philosophy, responsible innovation and other emerging, frontier and crosscutting fields. In the construction of discourse system, work has been done to make China’s voice heard on the international stage, excavate and elucidate the excellent traditional Chinese culture, and build disciplines with Chinese characteristics. In short, the achievements of the Chinese philosophy of science and technology have not come easily. Though a diverse and dynamic academic pattern has been formed, and wonderful and unique Chinese discourse has been created, we still face some problems. To accelerate the construction of “Three Systems” of the philosophy of science and technology with Chinese characteristics by building on existing achievements, we should carry forward the tradition of dialectics of nature and strengthen the guidance of Marxism, consolidate the foundation of philosophy and support interdisciplinary interaction and cooperation, track the frontiers of science and technology, and pay attention to the social operation of science and technology.