浅谈中医阴阳理论认识局限与创新

提出了中医传统阴阳理论认识的局限性,并客观分析了局限性产生的原因,结合现代哲学和相关科学知识大胆地提出了现代中医阴阳理论的新认识——地球生态系统阴阳观,并就其内涵及应用意义进行简要阐述,进一步丰富了中医基础理论,为中医药研究、教学、临床等提供新的理论参考,以期促进中医事业发展,为中医、中西医结合发展提供有益探索。     

Enrolling the Citizen in Sustainability: Membership Categorization,Morality and Civic Participation

This article examines the common-sense and methodical ways in which “the citizen” is produced and enrolled as an active participant in “sustainable” regional planning. Using Membership Categorization Analysis, we explicate how the categorization procedures in the Foreword of a draft regional planning policy interactionally produce the identity of “the citizen” and “civic values and obligations” in relation to geographic place and institutional categories. Furthermore, we show how positioning practices establish a relationship between authors (government) and readers (citizens) where both are ascribed with the same moral values and obligations toward the region. Hence, “the citizen” as an active participant in “sustainable” regional planning is viewed as a practical accomplishment that is underpinned by a normative morality associated with the task of producing orderliness in “text-in-interaction.”

组织创新气氛的研究进展与展望

组织创新气氛（organizationalinnovationclimate）是组织成员对组织环境创新特性的一致性认知。在文献研究的基础上,文章从组织创新气氛的概念与形成、结构与测量、组织创新气氛与创新绩效的关系等方面,对国内外组织创新气氛研究进行了归纳概括,指出了该研究领域存在的问题,并提出了一些具体的改善建议     

领导者底线心智对团队创新的双刃剑效应

底线心智是一种以获取底线利润结果为中心,而忽略其他一切竞争事项优先权(如企业社会责任、利益相关者权益、员工福利等)的单维思维模式。虽然底线心智可能导致管理者只注重绩效而忽视其他对企业有利的重要事项,甚至采取不道德的手段来实现目标,但研究也表明底线心智能够提高员工工作专注度进而提升绩效。为进一步推进底线心智双刃剑效应的研究,本文构建了领导者底线心智对团队创新双刃剑效应的影响机制模型,指出领导者底线心智一方面抑制了团队风险承担意愿,进而相比于探索式创新更有益于利用式创新;另一方面能够激发团队强迫激情,从而相比于团队创意产生更有利于团队创意实施。本文为深化底线心智领域的研究提供了参考,也为组织和领导者如何更好管理底线心智提供了重要建议。     

工作场所中员工创新的内驱力：员工创造力自我效能感

自我效能感在创新领域具体运用后,发展为创造力自我效能感, 是指个体对创造成功的信念。以往的研究多集中于教育领域。随着员工创新在组织创新中地位提升, 研究者发现, 对创新成功所抱有的信念是支撑员工将创新行为实施到底的重要内在力量, 创造力自我效能感的研究开始向组织领域拓展。文章对创造力自我效能感在组织领域的最新研究进行归纳,总结了影响员工创造力自我效能感的主要因素：领导支持、工作的复杂度等;提炼了员工创造力自我效能感与员工创新的关系, 说明员工创造力自我效能感无论是作为员工创新心理的一个维度, 还是作为一个独立变量在个体创新机制中起中介或者调节作用, 均与员工创新紧密相关; 最后, 提出下一步的研究需要对员工创造力自我效能感的测量以及影响因素进行深入研究, 为管理实践提供更多的理论依据。     

组织创新气氛的测量及其在员工创新能力与创新绩效关系中的调节效应

首先通过对46名在职MBA研究生的开放式问卷数据进行质性分析, 归纳探索出了基于我国国情的组织创新气氛的基本结构, 并参定预试测332份数据的反馈结果编制了组织创新气氛问卷。483份有效数据的探索性因素分析发现组织创新气氛是一个包括激励机制、领导躬行、团队协力、上级支持、资源保障、组织促进、自主工作等在内的七因素模型。为进一步验证该结构的有效性, 我们在10家企业共获得有效数据413份, 进行了验证性因素分析, 结果显示: 基于中国文化背景编制的组织创新气氛问卷具有良好的效度和信度; 同时, 运用层次回归分析还发现, 组织创新气氛在员工创新能力与创新绩效关系中具有显著的调节作用。     

负责任创新理论在生物医学伦理治理中的应用及启示

“负责任创新”是目前全球公认的理想发展愿景,近年来成为生物医学伦理治理的重要理论,基于Web of Science核心数据库,运用VOSviewer软件,通过对生物医学伦理治理的文献分析,发现“负责任创新”理论被广泛运用于基础医学、临床治疗、全球医疗卫生系统等诸多生物医疗领域;在不同治理情景中界定出创新、价值和评价三类责任主体,政府责任在具体实践中起到重要作用;在案例实践中完善了四维度框架中的伦理审查方式,为更好地将该理论运用到我国生物医学伦理治理中提供借鉴意义。

     

Two different approaches to philosophy a critical reflection on contemporary Chinese philosophy

By means of critical reflection on the current situation of Chinese philosophy, this article aims to clarify two different approaches to philosophy. One is for scholars to focus on original texts and thought tradition, concerned with interpretation and inheritance; even in this way, scholars can achieve theoretical innovation through creative interpretation. The other is for researchers to face up questions from academics and from reality, and mainly to do theoretical creation in philosophy on a profound theoretical background, strictly following academic norms and standards. For contemporary Chinese philosophy, the two approaches are indispensable, but the serious problem is that the first approach absolutely is dominant, but the second is too weak. The correct choice of Chinese philosophy should be to let hundreds of flower bloom, to let different approaches compete with each other, and to cooperatively establish the prosperity of contemporary Chinese philosophy.     

Deconstructing ‘Western esotericism’: on Wouter Hanegraaff's Esotericism and the Academy

This paper discusses a number of consequences that – although not always intended by the author – can be drawn from the radically historicist approach adopted by Wouter J. Hanegraaff in his monograph Esotericism and the Academy. These consequences are the atomization of ‘esotericism’ into a disparate range of ideas, practices, and currents with few if any shared elements; a better approximation to contemporary anthropological views of culture and cultural innovation; a focus on polemical strategies rather than substantive contents and a concomitant possibility of cross-cultural comparison; a reluctance to engage with theories of broader scope; and a vacillation between seeing ‘esotericism’ as merely a waste-basket category and attempting nonetheless to salvage a minimal substantive definition.