Julie Sealy  Ira P. Glovinsky 《Infant mental health journal》2016,37(2):115-124

  相似文献   

    

Nicolas Favez  France Frascarolo  Nathalie Grimard 《Infant mental health journal》2016,37(3):235-246

  相似文献   

    

Mellanie Rollans  Jane Kohlhoff  Tanya Meade  Lynn Kemp  Virginia Schmied 《Infant mental health journal》2016,37(3):302-312

  相似文献   

    

Rafaela G.M. Cassiano  Claudia M. Gaspardo  Maria Beatriz M. Linhares 《Infant mental health journal》2016,37(3):274-288

  相似文献   

    

Lori A. Roggman  Gina A. Cook  Mark S. Innocenti  Vonda Jump Norman  Lisa K. Boyce  Katie Christiansen  Carla A. Peterson 《Infant mental health journal》2016,37(3):193-207

  相似文献   

    

Anita Sundnes  Agnes Andenaes 《Infant mental health journal》2016,37(3):247-258

  相似文献   

    

Abigail K. Mansfield  Gabor I. Keitner  Jennifer Dealy 《Family process》2015,54(1):82-93

The current study set out to describe family functioning scores of a contemporary community sample, using the Family Assessment Device (FAD), and to compare this to a currently help‐seeking sample. The community sample consisted of 151 families who completed the FAD. The help‐seeking sample consisted of 46 families who completed the FAD at their first family therapy appointment as part of their standard care at an outpatient family therapy clinic at an urban hospital. Findings suggest that FAD means from the contemporary community sample indicate satisfaction with family functioning, while FAD scores from the help‐seeking sample indicate dissatisfaction with family functioning. In addition, the General Functioning scale of the FAD continues to correlate highly with all other FAD scales, except Behavior Control. The cut‐off scores for the FAD indicating satisfaction or dissatisfaction by family members with their family functioning continue to be relevant and the FAD continues to be a useful tool to assess family functioning in both clinical and research contexts.  相似文献   

    

Jacqui Gabb  Reenee Singh 《Family process》2015,54(1):185-197

We explore how “emotion maps” can be productively used in clinical assessment and clinical practice with families and couples. This graphic participatory method was developed in sociological studies to examine everyday family relationships. Emotion maps enable us to effectively “see” the dynamic experience and emotional repertoires of family life. Through the use of a case example, in this article we illustrate how emotion maps can add to the systemic clinicians’ repertoire of visual methods. For clinicians working with families, couples, and young people, the importance of gaining insight into how lives are lived, at home, cannot be understated. Producing emotion maps can encourage critical personal reflection and expedite change in family practice. Hot spots in the household become visualized, facilitating dialogue on prevailing issues and how these events may be perceived differently by different family members. As emotion maps are not reliant on literacy or language skills they can be equally completed by parents and children alike, enabling children's perspective to be heard. Emotion maps can be used as assessment tools, to demonstrate the process of change within families. Furthermore, emotion maps can be extended to use through technology and hence are well suited particularly to working with young people. We end the article with a wider discussion of the place of emotions and emotion maps within systemic psychotherapy.  相似文献   

    

Conroy Reynolds  Carmen Knudson‐Martin 《Family process》2015,54(2):293-307

This study began with curiosity regarding how long‐term couples with children manage their relationships in view of changing societal demands and ideals. Couples interviewed for this study described the intersection of time and intimacy as a core issue. Thus, this analysis focused on how couples construct intimacy in shared time. The diverse sample included 17 heterosexual working and professional class couples in the United States who had been committed for at least 10 years and whose oldest child was aged 6–16. Analysis identified four types of shared time experiences: gender divided, elusive, growing, and emotionally connected. Four factors influenced these types: (a) negotiated gendered differences, (b) intentionality, (c) mutual attending, and (d) dyadic friendship. The most emotionally connected couples reported that time together reinforced satisfaction and pleasure from their relationships. Results help explain different ways couples successfully negotiate changing expectations for heterosexual relationships and why some couples struggle. Findings suggest that therapists help couples intentionally develop habits of friendship and mutual attending.  相似文献   

    

Gabriela L. Stein  Linda E. Guzman 《Family process》2015,54(2):280-292

The present paper takes a translational approach in applying the themes of the current special section to prevention and intervention science in Latino families. The paper reviews the current literature on cultural processes in prevention and intervention research with Latino families. Overall, many prevention and intervention programs have either been developed specifically for Latino families or have been modified for Latino families with great attention paid to the socio‐cultural needs of these families. Nevertheless, few studies have tested the role of cultural values or acculturation processes on outcomes. We make recommendations based on findings within basic science and in particular this special section on the incorporation of these values and processes into prevention and intervention science with Latino families.  相似文献