首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   590篇
  免费   59篇
  国内免费   3篇
  652篇
  2024年   1篇
  2023年   11篇
  2022年   4篇
  2021年   10篇
  2020年   16篇
  2019年   40篇
  2018年   34篇
  2017年   27篇
  2016年   41篇
  2015年   29篇
  2014年   39篇
  2013年   102篇
  2012年   26篇
  2011年   12篇
  2010年   13篇
  2009年   18篇
  2008年   19篇
  2007年   18篇
  2006年   22篇
  2005年   20篇
  2004年   20篇
  2003年   13篇
  2002年   20篇
  2001年   12篇
  2000年   14篇
  1999年   10篇
  1998年   17篇
  1997年   8篇
  1996年   4篇
  1995年   4篇
  1993年   1篇
  1992年   1篇
  1990年   2篇
  1988年   1篇
  1987年   1篇
  1985年   2篇
  1984年   1篇
  1983年   1篇
  1982年   2篇
  1981年   4篇
  1980年   3篇
  1979年   1篇
  1978年   2篇
  1976年   3篇
  1974年   3篇
排序方式: 共有652条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
651.
Scott Spector 《Jewish History》2006,20(3-4):349-361
Between the Enlightenment and the Holocaust, a wide range of German-speaking Jewish subjects shared certain assumptions about a problematic associated with being Jewish and living in a non-Jewish German society (and the concomitant process of relative “assimilation”). The categories of identity and culture that undergirded this problematic became part of a shared lexicon of a German-Jewish “identity crisis”—a lexicon that was handed down to the historiography of German Jews that would develop after the community’s destruction. The author of this contribution challenges the validity of some of these categorical assumptions by setting them against the varied background of German-Jewish experience in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, offering a model of subjectivity (rather than identity) that might allow the historiography to break out of the cyclical repetition in which it currently finds itself. By examining specific exemplars, including Gershom Scholem, Edith Stein, Martin Buber, and others, the author models a reading strategy that would be appropriate for German-Jewish subjectivity.  相似文献   
652.
ABSTRACT

In 1835 Nathan Rothschild purchased Gunnersbury Park. Set in only 75 acres, this Regency villa in Ealing, just outside London, was the antithesis of a landed estate. The house remained in the family until 1925. This article argues that the architecture, interior decoration, garden and social use of Gunnersbury Park, although consonant with villa tradition, were shaped by the choices of this Jewish mercantile family, instrumental in Rothschild self-fashioning and their pursuit of acceptance by the social elite. As Gunnersbury evolved to serve the changing needs of successive generations, it invited the outside world in, redefining the family through new interests in sport, the garden and collecting, all nurtured there. Remarkably this acculturation took place within, not outside the Jewish context, the ties of family and religion remaining vital influences. In tracing this social rite of passage, it emerges that by the twentieth century the Rothschilds, now enmeshed in upper-class society, defined themselves not simply as Jews but as British Jews. Gunnersbury Park, neglected in Rothschild historiography, facilitated this transformation while remaining a family home of lasting resonance for all who had known it.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号