排序方式: 共有111条查询结果,搜索用时 93 毫秒
71.
James Barry 《Islam & Christian-Muslim Relations》2016,27(1):77-93
ABSTRACTAyatollah Khomeini's 1989 fatwa against Salman Rushdie cemented Iran's space within Western discourses surrounding blasphemy and Islam. The fatwa has earned its place within the polarizing debate between free speech and religious tolerance, which fundamentally serves the political ambitions of those involved. This article therefore argues that, in order to understand accusations of blasphemy in Iran, one must address the political concerns in which the accusation takes place since these reveal Iran's tendency towards pragmatic dogma – the practice of meeting the needs of the state in a way that accords with its religious ideology. The responses of Iranian officials to the Charlie Hebdo killings in 2015 provide a useful case study for the analysis of this pragmatic dogma, since the Islamic Republic pursued a different approach to the Charlie Hebdo “blasphemy” from that which it had followed with Rushdie. Instead of condoning the killings, Iran's political and religious elite chose to condemn the actions of both the cartoonists and the gunmen, without outlining a punishment. The article will argue that this case demonstrates many of the continuing themes in Iran's approach to blasphemy, since the Charlie Hebdo cartoons have largely been used to reinforce the Islamic Republic's overall worldview. 相似文献
72.
This article brings to a conclusion the series of three special sections published in 2015 and 2016 by Religion, State and Society on ‘Religion and local politics in southern Europe’. We set up a research agenda on the interactions between religion and local politics in Southern Europe. In doing so, we focus on the localisation of religion, including religious debates, and on the impact of the recent economic crisis. More specifically, we address the local as a contested concept, the multilevel governance of religion as a scalar opportunity structure – in relation to the transnational dimension of religious actors – the effects of such changes in the welfare landscape and the impact of the economic crisis on the activities and strategies of religious actors in Southern Europe. Our research agenda focuses on the interactions between two main dimensions: the territorial impact of political and economic changes, and the multiscalar schemes of territorial governance. 相似文献
73.
Johan Leman Ann Trappers Emily Brandon Xavier Ruppol 《Studies in Philosophy and Education》2008,27(4):237-251
OECD figures (1998–2002) reveal a sharply increasing flow of foreign workers into European countries. Ethnic diversification
has become a generalized matter of fact. At the same time, rapidly developing technology and ‘intellectual globalization’
processes—the world wide web—have also become a reality. This complex cluster of changes has an impact on the perceptions
of the self and of the other. Multilayered belongings and paradoxical meanings enter into interethnic relations in sometimes
most surprising and unpredictable ways from outside of the boundaries of local communities. But the developments also create
new and very positive opportunities for education/schooling and social cohesion. The paper critically examines this changing
context and also Europe’s educational responses to the new challenges: the European Socrates programme, the initiatives in
the field of intercultural citizenship education and the issue of combating deprivation.
相似文献
Xavier RuppolEmail: |
74.
This essay discusses main features and developments of the study of religion(s) in Western Europe. It attempts a historical, geographical, and thematic synthesis. Part III outlines post-World War II developments with regard to journals, textbooks, and survey works. It looks at national figureheads, disciplinary boundaries and the changing fortunes of the phenomenology of religion. The series concludes by addressing selected key areas of scholarly work and current issues and concerns. 相似文献
75.
Exploring the meso-levels of religious mappings: European religion in regional, urban, and local contexts 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
This is an introductory essay to a special issue on Local and Regional Perspectives on Religion in Western Europe. The introduction seeks to contextualize this special issue in the study of religion in Europe. Based on the articles of the special issue, the article introduces two meso-levels of investigation: regional and local studies, bridging the gap between the national level (the hitherto preferred level of aggregation) and the study of single groups. 相似文献
76.
This article tells the story of the journey made by an international research group of social psychologists in their collaborative
projects carried out over a number of years after the collapse of communism in Europe in 1989. The article explores some relations
between the aims of research conducted during a period of rapid political, social and economic change in Central and Eastern
Europe, and the ways these studies were shaped and transformed through collaboration. It shows how the collaboration of researchers
in the team affected the development of theoretical concepts and methodological ideas over the years, as well as how the team
learned from mistakes. Collaborative efforts cannot be viewed separately from the content of research. Moreover, this international
collaborative research has shown that the relationships between institutional and cultural changes cannot be understood by
means of comparing phenomena across different countries but by case studies in individual countries.
Ivana Marková is Emeritus Professor of psychology at the University of Stirling. She has carried out research into social representations of various kinds of phenomena (political, physical illness and mental disability) and communication. Her main theoretical interest is a dialogical theory of knowledge and its relation to social representations. Her latest books include Dialogicality and Social Representations, CUP (2003), which has been translated into several languages; The Making of Modern Social Psychology (with Serge Moscovici), Polity (2006); and Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge (with Per Linell, Michele Grossen and Anne Salazar-Orvig), Equinox (2007). Jana Plichtová is a senior researcher at the Slovak Academy of Sciences - Department of Social and Biological Communication and a professor of Social Psychology at the Comenius University in Bratislava. Her theoretical interests include topics like social psychology of democracy, deliberation in small groups, analysis of argumentation, social representations of political and economic phenomena. She is co-author of several papers on social representations of democracy published in Culture and Psychology, European Journal of Social Psychology, Bulletin de Psychologie, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. She is regularly publishing in Slovak and Czech journals like Československá psychologie and Filozofia on the epistemological and methodological issues. She is an editor of several books (e.g. Minorities in Politics) and a co-author of two books published by Slovak publishers. Her book entitled “On Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the research of social representations” is widely used source by students of sociological social psychology. 相似文献
Ivana MarkováEmail: |
Ivana Marková is Emeritus Professor of psychology at the University of Stirling. She has carried out research into social representations of various kinds of phenomena (political, physical illness and mental disability) and communication. Her main theoretical interest is a dialogical theory of knowledge and its relation to social representations. Her latest books include Dialogicality and Social Representations, CUP (2003), which has been translated into several languages; The Making of Modern Social Psychology (with Serge Moscovici), Polity (2006); and Dialogue in Focus Groups: Exploring Socially Shared Knowledge (with Per Linell, Michele Grossen and Anne Salazar-Orvig), Equinox (2007). Jana Plichtová is a senior researcher at the Slovak Academy of Sciences - Department of Social and Biological Communication and a professor of Social Psychology at the Comenius University in Bratislava. Her theoretical interests include topics like social psychology of democracy, deliberation in small groups, analysis of argumentation, social representations of political and economic phenomena. She is co-author of several papers on social representations of democracy published in Culture and Psychology, European Journal of Social Psychology, Bulletin de Psychologie, Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology. She is regularly publishing in Slovak and Czech journals like Československá psychologie and Filozofia on the epistemological and methodological issues. She is an editor of several books (e.g. Minorities in Politics) and a co-author of two books published by Slovak publishers. Her book entitled “On Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the research of social representations” is widely used source by students of sociological social psychology. 相似文献
77.
Maarten Simons Barbara Haverhals Gert Biesta 《Studies in Philosophy and Education》2007,26(5):395-404
Although universities are asked to play a role in the European knowledge society, the precise scope and meaning of this role
is still under discussion. A major issue in this debate is the trend to adapt universities to economic needs and demands of
society. In view of taking a critical stance against a one-sided economic interpretation of activities and functions of universities,
their so-called “public” role is increasingly stressed in the debate as a crucial responsibility of universities that should
not be marginalized and therefore deserves our attention. In this paper, which is the introduction to a special issue on the
public role of the university, we want to stress the importance of addressing the question of “the role of universities in
the Europe of knowledge” in an open way and thus, without prejudices against or in favour of possible answers. It is our contention
that a critical view of what is happening in universities today cannot simply rely on authoritative ideas or principles that
are vaguely reminiscent of our university traditions. Consequently, this introductory paper pleas for a firmer argumentative
and a richer empirical basis that takes account of the fact that our background (horizon) has thoroughly changed in comparison
to traditions that still implicitly inform our judgement of what universities can do, should do or should not do. Finally,
we will discuss the way in which the articles collected in this issue are intended stimulating and supporting the debate on
the public role of the university in Europe.
相似文献
Barbara HaverhalsEmail: |
78.
Josephine E. Olson Irene H. Frieze Sally Wall Bozena Zdaniuk Anuška Ferligoj Tina Kogovšek Jasna Horvat Nataša Šarlija Eva Jarošová Daniela Pauknerová Lan Anh Nguyen Luu Mònika Kovacs Jolanta Miluska Aida Orgocka Ludmila Erokhina Olga V. Mitina Ludmila V. Popova Nijolė Petkevičiūtė Mirjana Pejic-Bach Slavka Kubušová Maja Rus Makovec 《Sex roles》2007,56(5-6):297-308
Do economic indicators predict the general level of support for gender equality? This question was investigated in a sample of countries in Central and Eastern Europe, a region that has been undergoing rapid economic changes since the early 1990s. In this overall sample of male and female college students from ten countries, including the United States as a comparison, the predicted association between stronger beliefs in gender role egalitarianism and positive economic factors was generally supported. Also, consistent with other research, women were more in support of gender equality than men were. There was no support for a predicted trend in less support for gender equality over the time period of the present study. 相似文献
79.
Voting is key to political integration of immigrant-background minorities, but what determines their voting preferences remains unclear. Moreover, dual-citizen minorities can vote differently in their country of residence and origin. Using a representative survey of Turkish-Muslim minorities in two cities in Belgium (N = 447, M_age = 36.3), we asked whether left-right ideology or religious identity predicted their voting in their country of residence and origin, besides typical predictors of right-wing voting (i.e., efficacy, deprivation, and authoritarianism). Authoritarianism, low political efficacy, and high deprivation predicted voting for right-wing parties in Turkey, whereas the latter two, surprisingly, predicted voting for the left in Belgium. Latent class analyses of their religious practices distinguished “moderate” versus “strict” Muslims. While “strict” Muslims voted for right-wing parties in Turkey, ideology did not predict their voting. Conversely, in Belgium, while Muslim identity did not predict their voting, ideology did. Analyzing their combined effects, “moderate” Muslims voted based on their ideology—right-leaning voting for the right, whereas “strict” Muslims voted according to their interests as a disadvantaged minority in Belgium—thus voting for the left—or as a devout Muslim in Turkey—thus voting for the right. Our results elucidate processes underlying the voting behaviors of European-Muslim minorities. 相似文献
80.
Geert Hofstede 《Asian Journal of Social Psychology》2007,10(1):16-21
How culture‐proof are the social sciences? Travelling in another continent, one meets culture's influences not only in the objects of social science research, but at least as much in the minds of the researchers. Researchers' problem definitions and choices of issues to be addressed and questions to be asked limit what they will find; they are a potential source of ethnocentric bias. A case example of the discovery of such a bias was the emergence of a fifth dimension of national cultures supplementing Hofstede's four, through Bond's Chinese Value Survey. In the area of personality research, a number of newer and older findings by Asian and European researchers suggest the need for expanding the ‘Big Five’ model of personality traits with a sixth factor, Dependence on Others, in order to make the model culturally universal. In general, researchers recognize primarily those aspects of culture for which their own culture differs most from others. For escaping from the cultural constraints in our own research we therefore need to trade ideas with colleagues from other parts of the world. In this respect, Asian researchers have an important role to play. 相似文献