首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   50篇
  免费   1篇
  2021年   1篇
  2020年   1篇
  2019年   4篇
  2018年   1篇
  2016年   3篇
  2015年   1篇
  2013年   26篇
  2012年   2篇
  2010年   1篇
  2009年   4篇
  2008年   1篇
  2007年   1篇
  2006年   1篇
  2004年   2篇
  2003年   1篇
  2002年   1篇
排序方式: 共有51条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
51.
While there is a growing literature on global managers, most studies in this area have not built upon the wealth of existing knowledge in the field of management development. This study examines if established theoretical constructs will account for managerial performance in complex global jobs and investigates the utility of each of these approaches. Boss performance ratings were correlated with manager's self-ratings on measures of personality, role skill, learning capability, business knowledge, and international experiences for 194 managers--half with global responsibilities and half with domestic responsibilities. Skill in the roles of leader and decision maker were significantly related to performance ratings for managers in high and low global complexity jobs. Learning skills, additional role skills, and international business knowledge were uniquely, albeit modestly, related to performance ratings for managers in globally complex jobs. A development framework is proposed that integrates the various theoretical constructs. Specifically, personality and international experience are considered as antecedent to skill rather than as predictors of global performance. Financial resources are not the problem. We have the money, products, and position to be a dominant global player. What we lack are the human resources. We just don't have enough people with the needed global leadership capabilities.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号