全文获取类型
收费全文 | 218篇 |
免费 | 8篇 |
国内免费 | 2篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 4篇 |
2022年 | 5篇 |
2021年 | 1篇 |
2020年 | 4篇 |
2019年 | 6篇 |
2018年 | 6篇 |
2017年 | 5篇 |
2016年 | 3篇 |
2015年 | 4篇 |
2014年 | 8篇 |
2013年 | 33篇 |
2012年 | 7篇 |
2011年 | 1篇 |
2010年 | 6篇 |
2009年 | 3篇 |
2008年 | 14篇 |
2007年 | 28篇 |
2006年 | 20篇 |
2005年 | 16篇 |
2004年 | 15篇 |
2003年 | 8篇 |
2002年 | 10篇 |
2001年 | 4篇 |
1999年 | 4篇 |
1998年 | 2篇 |
1997年 | 2篇 |
1996年 | 4篇 |
1995年 | 1篇 |
1992年 | 1篇 |
1989年 | 2篇 |
1987年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有228条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
161.
《创造性行为杂志》2017,51(4):338-340
The 50 years anniversary of The Journal of Creative Behavior offers a festive occasion to reflect on the recent history of the field as well as look toward its future. From the standpoint of sociocultural psychology, I celebrate the growing importance of society and culture within creativity research. However, I also note an important distinction between “social inside” and “social outside” approaches. A truly culture‐inclusive field would go beyond the view of culture as “container” and explore the ways in which sociocultural contexts actively participate in creativity. At the same time, it would examine how creative action, in turn, shapes society and culture, particularly at times of growing intolerance, nationalism, and inequality. A socially engaged agenda for creativity research is timely both conceptually and practically. Taken together, these two pillars could not only advance but also fundamentally transform our field, carrying it for the next 50 years and beyond. 相似文献
162.
“泗县甲肝疫苗事件”的启示 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
安徽省泗县甲肝疫苗事件是一起罕见的群体性心因反应,造成了巨大的经济损失和不良的社会影响。通过分析这次事件的发生起因、进展过程和处理结果,我们认识到目前卫生技术人员和政府部门在应对突发性公共卫生事件上存在能力缺乏和经验不足,这给我们在认识事物、分析问题和科学决策上带来了深刻的启示。 相似文献
163.
Gert Biesta 《Studies in Philosophy and Education》2007,26(5):467-479
In this paper I ask whether the University has a special role to play in democratic societies. I argue that the modern University
can no longer lay claim to a research monopoly since nowadays research is conducted in many places outside of the University.
The University can, however, still lay claim to a kind of knowledge monopoly which has to with the central role Universities
play in the definition of what counts as scientific knowledge. The problem is, however, that the University’s knowledge monopoly
is predominantly understood in epistemological terms. This leaves only one role for the University in a democratic society,
viz., that of the expert. Based on ideas from John Dewey and Bruno Latour I suggest a different way to understand the distinction
between ‘scientific’ and ‘everyday’ knowledge. Against this background I argue that the University can contribute towards
the democratisation of knowledge if it articulates the difference between scientific and everyday knowledge in non-epistemological
terms.
相似文献
Gert BiestaEmail: |
164.
Maarten Simons Barbara Haverhals Gert Biesta 《Studies in Philosophy and Education》2007,26(5):395-404
Although universities are asked to play a role in the European knowledge society, the precise scope and meaning of this role
is still under discussion. A major issue in this debate is the trend to adapt universities to economic needs and demands of
society. In view of taking a critical stance against a one-sided economic interpretation of activities and functions of universities,
their so-called “public” role is increasingly stressed in the debate as a crucial responsibility of universities that should
not be marginalized and therefore deserves our attention. In this paper, which is the introduction to a special issue on the
public role of the university, we want to stress the importance of addressing the question of “the role of universities in
the Europe of knowledge” in an open way and thus, without prejudices against or in favour of possible answers. It is our contention
that a critical view of what is happening in universities today cannot simply rely on authoritative ideas or principles that
are vaguely reminiscent of our university traditions. Consequently, this introductory paper pleas for a firmer argumentative
and a richer empirical basis that takes account of the fact that our background (horizon) has thoroughly changed in comparison
to traditions that still implicitly inform our judgement of what universities can do, should do or should not do. Finally,
we will discuss the way in which the articles collected in this issue are intended stimulating and supporting the debate on
the public role of the university in Europe.
相似文献
Barbara HaverhalsEmail: |
165.
和谐是当今社会的主旋律,也是从古到今人们永恒的追求,我们的先哲们自古就充分认识到了和谐的价值.中国古代和谐观主要包括三个方面的内容:人与自然的和谐,人与人的和谐,人自身的和谐.古为今用,在建设社会主义和谐社会的大环境下,我们能够更深刻的理解它的现代价值--在我们的和谐社会的建设中发挥它的指导作用. 相似文献
166.
在当今中国为合理个人主义正名并无可能——与黄显中同志《个人主义与市民社会》一文商榷 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
合理个人主义既不合理,也不现实,它存在着逻辑矛盾。合理个人主义不是商品经济的反映,而是资本主义私有制商品经济的必然。传统意义的市民社会在本质上是资本主义性质的世俗社会,它是政治社会的经济基础。我国当今不存在合理个人主义的经济基础。 相似文献
167.
168.
169.
《World Futures: Journal of General Evolution》2012,68(4-5):332-351
In my view, we need a sociological analysis to show how the crisis stemmed from a certain set-up of the so-called global society. Such a set-up is the product of a long historical development, which goes beyond the financial crisis’ outbreak in 2008. The question I ask is the following: from a sociological standpoint, why did this crisis break out? And what remedies can be put in place? The measures adopted these days cannot solve the crisis, but, for a number of reasons, they can at most provide temporary stoppers and remedies. 相似文献
170.
John J. Carvalho 《Zygon》2007,42(2):289-300
One of the most threatening problems the world faces is the growing poverty crisis and the related human rights inequalities and the spread of diseases in underprivileged areas. Human rights and relief organizations try hard to contain the devastation of these interconnected difficulties. What is the role of the biomedical scientist in this endeavor? The challenges that biomedical scientists face in their research lead us to question whether scientists can go beyond the time‐consuming realm of experimental investigation and engage the issues of society in a more public way. I suggest how the scientist's role can be expanded in our complex and precarious world, introducing the idea of the modern biomedical researcher as scientist, scholar‐philosopher, and statesman for the scientific community and the larger human rights community. I provide examples of where the scientist can interface with human rights organizations, medical doctors, political and civic leaders, and the science‐religion dialogue. My argument reveals the emerging role of the biomedical scientist as one of public service in addition to and beyond the realm of the experimental investigator. This role, however, is formidable, and I list some of the obstacles it entails. 相似文献