全文获取类型
收费全文 | 632篇 |
免费 | 48篇 |
国内免费 | 6篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 4篇 |
2022年 | 13篇 |
2021年 | 23篇 |
2020年 | 22篇 |
2019年 | 22篇 |
2018年 | 27篇 |
2017年 | 26篇 |
2016年 | 27篇 |
2015年 | 14篇 |
2014年 | 27篇 |
2013年 | 68篇 |
2012年 | 11篇 |
2011年 | 16篇 |
2010年 | 19篇 |
2009年 | 23篇 |
2008年 | 48篇 |
2007年 | 32篇 |
2006年 | 24篇 |
2005年 | 14篇 |
2004年 | 14篇 |
2003年 | 17篇 |
2002年 | 8篇 |
2001年 | 4篇 |
2000年 | 5篇 |
1999年 | 3篇 |
1998年 | 9篇 |
1997年 | 6篇 |
1996年 | 4篇 |
1995年 | 2篇 |
1993年 | 2篇 |
1992年 | 2篇 |
1991年 | 2篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
1985年 | 13篇 |
1984年 | 17篇 |
1983年 | 8篇 |
1982年 | 12篇 |
1981年 | 15篇 |
1980年 | 15篇 |
1979年 | 16篇 |
1978年 | 17篇 |
1977年 | 4篇 |
1976年 | 8篇 |
1975年 | 6篇 |
1974年 | 7篇 |
1973年 | 9篇 |
排序方式: 共有686条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
671.
We review the major phenomena of skilled typing and propose a model for the control of the hands and fingers during typing. The model is based upon an Activation-Trigger-Schema system in which a hierarchical structure of schemata directs the selection of the letters to be typed and, then, controls the hand and finger movements by a cooperative, relaxation algorithm. The interactions of the patterns of activation and inhibition among the schemata determine the temporal ordering for launching the keystrokes. To account for the phenomena of doubling errors, the model has only “type” schemata—no “token” schemata—with only a weak binding between the special schema that signals a doubling, and its argument. The model exists as a working computer simulation and produces an output display of the hands and fingers moving over the keyboard. It reproduces some of the major phenomena of typing, including the interkeystroke interval times, the pattern of transposition errors found in skilled typists, and doubling errors. Although the model is clearly inadequate or wrong in some of its features and assumptions, it serves as a useful first approximation for the understanding of skilled typing. 相似文献
672.
Raymond W. Gibbs 《Cognitive Science》1984,8(3):275-304
This paper evaluates the psychological status of literal meaning. Most linguistic and philosophical theories assume that sentences have well-specified literal meanings which represent the meaning of a sentence independent of context. Recent debate on this issue has centered on whether literal meaning can be equated with context-free meaning, or whether a sentence's literal meaning is determined only given a set of background assumptions. Neither of these positions meet the demands of a psychological theory of language understanding. Sentences do not have well-defined literal meanings, regardless of whether these are determined in light of a set of background assumptions. Moreover, the putative literal meanings of sentences do not contribute in systematic ways toward the understanding of speakers' utterance meanings. These observations suggest that the distinctions between literal and metaphoric meanings, and between semantics and pragmatics, have little psychological validity. 相似文献
673.
674.
675.
676.
677.
678.
When people are engaged in social interaction, they can repeat aspects of each other’s communicative behavior, such as words or gestures. This kind of behavioral alignment has been studied across a wide range of disciplines and has been accounted for by diverging theories. In this paper, we review various operationalizations of lexical and gestural alignment. We reveal that scholars have fundamentally different takes on when and how behavior is considered to be aligned, which makes it difficult to compare findings and draw uniform conclusions. Furthermore, we show that scholars tend to focus on one particular dimension of alignment (traditionally, whether two instances of behavior overlap in form), while other dimensions remain understudied. This hampers theory testing and building, which requires a well-defined account of the factors that are central to or might enhance alignment. To capture the complex nature of alignment, we identify five key dimensions to formalize the relationship between any pair of behavior: time, sequence, meaning, form, and modality. We show how assumptions regarding the underlying mechanism of alignment (placed along the continuum of priming vs. grounding) pattern together with operationalizations in terms of the five dimensions. This integrative framework can help researchers in the field of alignment and related phenomena (including behavior matching, mimicry, entrainment, and accommodation) to formulate their hypotheses and operationalizations in a more transparent and systematic manner. The framework also enables us to discover unexplored research avenues and derive new hypotheses regarding alignment. 相似文献
679.
680.