排序方式: 共有12条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
11.
Margaret T. Lynn Christopher C. Berger Travis A. Riddle Ezequiel Morsella 《Consciousness and cognition》2010,19(4):1007-1012
Can one be fooled into believing that one intended an action that one in fact did not intend? Past experimental paradigms have demonstrated that participants, when provided with false perceptual feedback about their actions, can be fooled into misperceiving the nature of their intended motor act. However, because veridical proprioceptive/perceptual feedback limits the extent to which participants can be fooled, few studies have been able to answer our question and induce the illusion to intend. In a novel paradigm addressing this question, participants were instructed to move a line on the computer screen by use of a phony brain–computer interface. Line movements were actually controlled by computer program. Demonstrating the illusion to intend, participants reported more intentions to move the line when it moved frequently than when it moved infrequently. Consistent with ideomotor theory, the finding illuminates the intimate liaisons among ideomotor processing, the sense of agency, and action production. 相似文献
12.
Philosophers are interested in the phenomenon of thought insertion because it challenges the common assumption that one can
ascribe to oneself the thoughts that one can access first-personally. In the standard philosophical analysis of thought insertion,
the subject owns the ‘inserted’ thought but lacks a sense of agency towards it. In this paper we want to provide an alternative
analysis of the condition, according to which subjects typically lack both ownership and authorship of the ‘inserted’ thoughts.
We argue that by appealing to a failure of ownership and authorship we can describe more accurately the phenomenology of thought
insertion, and distinguish it from that of non-delusional beliefs that have not been deliberated about, and of other delusions
of passivity. We can also start developing a more psychologically realistic account of the relation between intentionality,
rationality and self knowledge in normal and abnormal cognition.
相似文献
Matthew BroomeEmail: |