排序方式: 共有1条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Shrader-Frechette K 《Science and engineering ethics》2005,11(2):167-169
The International Commission on Radiological Protection — whose regularly updated recommendations are routinely adopted as
law throughout the globe — recently issued the first-ever ICRP protections for the environment. These draft 2005 proposals
are significant both because they offer the commission’s first radiation protections for any non-human parts of the planet
and because they will influence both the quality of radiation risk assessment and environmental protection, as well as the
global costs of nuclear-weapons cleanup, reactor decommissioning and radioactive waste management. This piece argues that
the 2005 recommendations are scientifically and ethically flawed, or gray, in at least three respects: first, in largely ignoring
scientific journals while employing mainly “gray literature;” second, in relying on non-transparent dose estimates and models,
rather than on actual radiation measurements; and third, in ignoring classical ethical constraints on acceptable radiation
risk. 相似文献
1