Index to Volume 29

Other Index

Index to Volume 29     

Subject Index

Subject Index

Subject Index     

Medical students' involvement in patient care

In a recent issue of The Journal of Clinical Ethics, Peter A. Ubel and Ari Silver-Isenstadt reported on patients' willingness to participate in medical education. Their findings and other data they refer to suggest that patients are generally willing to interact with medical students, but that this willingness may vary depending upon the clinical setting. The authors concluded that patients hold a right to information regarding students' participation in their care and that openness in this regard is valuable. The Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs (CEJA) of the American Medical Association (AMA) recently developed a policy that addresses the issues that were investigated by Ubel and Silver-Isenstadt.     

Software engineering code of ethics and professional practice

The Software Engineering Code of Ethics and Professional Practice, intended as a standard for teaching and practicing software engineering, documents the ethical and professional obligations of software engineers. The code should instruct practitioners about the standards society expects them to meet, about what their peers strive for, and about what to expect of one another. In addition, the code should also inform the public about the responsibilities that are important to the profession. Adopted in 2000 by the IEEE Computer Society and the ACM--two leading international computing societies--the code of ethics is intended as a guide for members of the evolving software engineering profession. The code was developed by a multinational task force with additional input from other professionals from industry, government posts, military installations, and educational professions.     

Key Word Index Volume 5

Other Index

Key Word Index Volume 5     

Author Index Volume 105

Authors Index

Author Index Volume 105     

The nature of perceived authority in the milgram paradigm: Two replications

Thirty-eight college students watched a short, edited version of Milgram’s documentary film, Obedience. They were then randomly assigned to one of two responseconditions: A Choice condition, in which they chose one of six explanations for the compliance of a subject depicted in the film, or a Likelihood condition, where they used a Likert-type scale to indicate the likelihood that each explanation elicited the subject’s compliance. The six explanations were based on French and Raven’s (1959) constructs regarding the bases of social power. We found that expert and legitimate power were judged as the most likely explanations in both conditions, replicating the findings of an earlier study that had used a different response format, i.e. rankordering the explanations, and thereby verifying the generality and robustness of the phenomenon.     

Response rate viewed as engagement bouts: effects of relative reinforcement and schedule type.

The rate of a reinforced response is conceptualized as a composite of engagement bouts (visits) and responding during visits. Part I of this paper describes a method for estimating the rate of visit initiations and the average number of responses per visit from log survivor plots: the proportion) of interresponse times (IRTs) longer than some elapsed time (log scale) plotted as a function of elapsed time. In Part 2 the method is applied to IRT distributions from rats that obtained food pellets by nose poking a lighted key under various multiple schedules of reinforcement. As expected, total response rate increased as a function of (a) increasing the rate of reinforcement (i.e., variable-interval [VI] 4 min vs. VI 1 mi), (b) increasing the amount of the reinforcer (one food pellet vs. four pellets), (c) increasing the percentage of reinforcers that were contingent on nose poking (25% vs. 100%), and (d) requiring additional responses after the end of the VI schedule (i.e., adding a tandem variable-ratio [VR] 9 requirement). The first three of these variables (relative reinforcement) increased the visit-initiation rate. The tandem VR, in contrast, increased the number of responses per visit. Thus, variables that have similar effects on total response rate can be differentiated based on their effects on the componemts of response rate.