Husserl's noema and the internalism‐externalism debate

In a number of papers, Hubert Dreyfus and Ronald McIntyre have claimed that Husserl is an internalist. In this paper, it is argued that their interpretation is based on two questionable assumptions: (1) that Husserl's noema should be interpreted along Fregean lines, and (2) that Husserl's transcendental methodology commits him to some form of methodological solipsism. Both of these assumptions are criticized on the basis of the most recent Husserl‐research. It is shown that Husserl's concept of noema can be interpreted in a manner that makes his theory far more congenial to a certain type of externalism, but ultimately it is argued that his phenomenological analysis of intentionality entails such a fundamental rethinking of the very relation between subjectivity and world that it hardly makes sense to designate it as being either internalist or externalist.     

On Self,Empathy, and Shame

Abstract

Replies to the comments on Self and Other in this Review Symposium by O’Shea, Magri, Papazian and Stout     

Michel Henry and the Phenomenology of the Invisible

Continental Philosophy Review -     

Constitution and ontology: Some remarks on Husserl's ontological position in the Logical Investigations

This paper is based on studies made during a stay at the University in Wuppertal, Germany. I thank Professor Klaus Held and Dr. Dieter Lohmar for their various comments upon my initial research.     

The effect of verbal instructions on preschool children's aggressive behavior

Aggressive preschool children were instructed by their teacher on the harm that results from aggression, its lack of effects as an interpersonal strategy, and the benefits that result from prosocial alternatives. Results from a time-lagged design indicated that aggressive behavior decreased and positive behavior increased as a result of these instructions. Data on maintenance of change suggest the possibility that the effects may be lasting. Overall, findings indicate that instructing children individually can be an effective strategy for modifying social interaction.     

同感、具身和人际理解:从里普斯到舒茨

谈到理解社会认知的本质,我们似乎只能在模仿理论、理论-理论或者二者的一些混合物之间选择。然而,作者在文中提出,现象学传统提供了有别于以上三者的第四个选项。首先,作者讨论了里普斯(Lipps)有关同感的阐释。接着,作者分析了舍勒、施坦(Stein)和胡塞尔批评里普斯的方式,勾勒了他们各自方案的核心特征。接下来,作者考察了舒茨(Schutz)如何承继并修改了上述三人对同感和社会认知的基本看法。最后,在结论中作者反驳了一种针对现象学方案的异议,进一步说明了现象学方案的可行性。