Informal and Professional Support for Solving Psychological Problems Among Korean‐Speaking Immigrants

Korean American immigrants rated the helpfulness of various sources of social support in addressing 3 psychological problems. Traditionalism was not related to perceived helpfulness of professionals but was significantly related to perceived helpfulness of informal support. Path analysis revealed that traditionalism and attitudes toward professionals mediated the effects of personal variables on the perceptions of social support.     

加工深度和元记忆训练对多重记忆系统监测的影响

这项研究探讨元记忆判断对情节记忆系统、语义记忆系统和ＰＲＳ（ｐｅｒｃｅｐｔｕａｌｒｅｐｒｅｓｅｎｔａｔｉｏｎ）系统的监测问题。已有的研究表明,元记忆对情节记忆的监测好于对语义记忆的监测。这项研究在深度加工和元记忆训练的条件下,进一步比较了Ｒ反应（Ｒｒｅｓｐｏｎｓｅｓ）项目、Ｋ反应（Ｋｒｅｓｐｏｎｓｅｓ）项目以及成功补笔项目的ＦＯＫ幅度（ＭＦＯＫ,ｍａｇｎｉｔｕｄｅｏｆＦＯＫ）。结果表明,无论是在深度加工的条件下,还是在元记忆训练的条件下,Ｒ项目的ＭＦＯＫ明最高于Ｋ项目和成功补笔项目。这说明元记忆系统的监测模式具有相对的稳定性,它不受记忆痕迹的性质与元记忆判断策略的影响。     

精诚合一:医学哲学事业的永恒主题

医学哲学事业的价值在于发现并弘扬医学的基本精神。“精诚合一”是医学亘古不变的基本精神。当代医学哲学研究的任务是揭示医学的“精诚合一”特征及其深刻内涵,注重“精”与“诚”的有机结合,批判现实医疗活动和理论研究在“精”、“诚”问题上的片面,弘扬医学的基本精神。     

团队问题解决的知识结构转换研究

本研究利用多维标度分析法,通过计算机联网实验．对团队问题解决过程中的知识结构进行获取与分析。我们考察了团队共享知识结构在群体讨论过程中结构性的区别,结果得出团队知识结构在概念聚集度、概念群数量、结构明晰性三个指标上发生了变化。我们认为,这些指标可以作为团队综合能力的指标,为团队评估与培训提供依据。     

一般性注意资源限制对返回抑制的影响

通过探讨视空间和语义通道内的注意资源的限制对IOR的影响的4个实验,来验证“IOR的低级成分不受注意资源限制的影响和IOR的高级成分受注意资源限制的影响”的假设。实验1A和1B的结果表明,在基于空间位置的简单检测任务中,IOR的低级成分既不随语义通道内注意资源的减少而消减,也不随空间通道内注意资源的减少而消减。实验2A和2B结果表明,在基于客体特性的辨别任务中,IOR的高级成分既随语义通道内注意资源的减少而消减,又随空间通道内注意资源的减少而消减。因此,辨别任务中的IOR受一般性注意资源的限制。同时,实验结果还表明,IOR的高级成分对空间通道内的注意资源的需求要高于对语义通道内注意资源的需求     

特征捆绑机制的理论模型

捆绑问题被认为是认知科学和神经科学的中心问题之一,对心理过程的认知神经机制研究起到了重要推动作用。特征捆绑机制研究有认知和神经科学两大范式。特征整合论在认知理论中最具代表性,形式理论修正了其在错觉性结合测量等方面的不足,双阶段理论突出了前注意捆绑。时间同步性理论是影响最大的捆绑理论,神经网络模型为捆绑机制提出了更具体的结构模型。两大范式的整合及由低级认知过程向高级心理过程的深化可能是今后捆绑机制研究的重点     

专业人员价值取向的现状研究

对8省市的428位专业人员所进行的价值取向研究表明,我国专业人员的价值取向总体倾向是积极向上,与社会期待相符合的,重视社会责任、工作、公众利益、法律规范、感情和家庭的价值;性别、文化程度和年龄等人口统计学因素显著影响专业人员的价值取向的个别侧面,但收入水平、婚姻状况和家庭结构的作用不显著。     

Brain potentials related to seeing one''s own name

Subjects were assigned an assumed name and then shown a series of statements of the form, "My name / is / X", where X was the assumed name, their own first name, or one of a set of other false names. Their task was to respond positively to the "assumed" name and reject as false all other names, including their own. An N380 feature of the averaged task-related brain potentials, considered to be inversely related to the degree of contextual priming, was greatly enhanced for the false names compared to the assumed name. The N380 to one's own name was more similar to that of the false than the assumed name, indicating that the sentence context's priming of various names was under the subjects' attentional control, and that the late negativity could be modulated by this attention. In contrast, a large P510 feature distinguished one's own name from the false name, and this difference was unaffected by practice. Even in cases, then, where the context allows anticipation of one verbal event (here, the assumed name), a highly overlearned and salient stimulus such as one's own name continues to produce a distinctive neural response.     

The research values of policy analysts

While there is growing consensus that conventional notions of the scientific method do not exhaust the methodological needs of policy analysis (at least applied analysis), there is less agreement as to what an improved method would entail. As a result, policy analysts must choose among often competing notions of what constitutes valid policy inquiry. Data from a content analysis of six policy journal articles together with responses from a survey of authors are used to determine what choices are made and whether these matter. Two sets of research norms are discovered within the policy studies community’one which mirrors traditional social science values and another which reflects recent attempts to adjust that methodology to meet the information needs of policy actors. Equally important, values tend, albeit slightly, to condition the character (e.g., degree of rigor or focus) of policy research. David M. Hedge is an associate professor of political science and director of the graduate program in public policy at West Virginia University. His research interests include regulatory politics, intergovernmental relations, and state politics/policy. Jin W. Mok is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Northern Iowa. His area of interests are public policy and methodology.     

In-group Bias and Culture of Collectivism

In this paper I present an argument that culture of collectivism which characterizes Japanese society is to be conceived in terms of an equilibrium between socio-relational and cognitive traits in which people have acquired expectations for generalized reciprocity within, not across, group boundaries. Maintenance of harmony among group members and voluntary cooperation toward group goals – the characteristics of collectivist culture – are often considered to be fundamentally psychological in nature. It is usually considered that members of a collectivist culture like to maintain harmony and cooperate toward group goals, or that "culture" sneaks into the minds of people and drives them to behave in such a manner. According to this view, culture is a fundamentally psychological or subjective matter. This is the view that I want to challenge in this paper.