A mutual interpretation and theoretical transplant of ethical-economical concepts is a process of the dialogue and discussion
on its “meaning,” and also a process of the transmission and interaction of values. However, over-interpretation, which is
inevitable in “understanding” “meaning,” and the plight of the “hegemony of values,” bring potential risks to value dissimilation
in the interpretation and transplant. Value migration—value hegemony—value dissimilation is its general process of development.
The academic reasoning behind overcoming the risk of value dissimilation is value ecology. The essence of value ecology is
to enable the meaning-dialogue and value interlocutions of ethics-economy follow the rules of ecology. Therefore, the process
of mutual interpretation and transplantation becomes a process of the ecological interlocution of ethics-economy, creating
a new value, eco-value. 相似文献
In this article, we study logics of unknown truths and false beliefs under neighborhood semantics. We compare the relative expressivity of the two logics. It turns out that they are incomparable over various classes of neighborhood models, and the combination of the two logics are equally expressive as standard modal logic over any class of neighborhood models. We propose morphisms for each logic, which can help us explore the frame definability problem, show a general soundness and completeness result, and generalize some results in the literature. We axiomatize the two logics over various classes of neighborhood frames. Most importantly, by adopting the intersection semantics and the subset semantics in the literature, we extend the results to the case of public announcements, which gives us the desired reduction axioms and has good applications related to Moore sentences, successful formulas and self-refuting formulas. Also, we can say something about the comparative merits of the intersection semantics and the subset semantics.