Direction dependence analysis: A framework to test the direction of effects in linear models with an implementation in SPSS

In nonexperimental data, at least three possible explanations exist for the association of two variables x and y: (1) x is the cause of y, (2) y is the cause of x, or (3) an unmeasured confounder is present. Statistical tests that identify which of the three explanatory models fits best would be a useful adjunct to the use of theory alone. The present article introduces one such statistical method, direction dependence analysis (DDA), which assesses the relative plausibility of the three explanatory models on the basis of higher-moment information about the variables (i.e., skewness and kurtosis). DDA involves the evaluation of three properties of the data: (1) the observed distributions of the variables, (2) the residual distributions of the competing models, and (3) the independence properties of the predictors and residuals of the competing models. When the observed variables are nonnormally distributed, we show that DDA components can be used to uniquely identify each explanatory model. Statistical inference methods for model selection are presented, and macros to implement DDA in SPSS are provided. An empirical example is given to illustrate the approach. Conceptual and empirical considerations are discussed for best-practice applications in psychological data, and sample size recommendations based on previous simulation studies are provided.     

Schreib- und Griffdruckuntersuchungen bei einfachen Hin- und Herbewegungen

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Luminosity Guaranteed

This article aims to show that Williamson's anti‐luminosity argument does not succeed if we presuppose a constitutive connection between the phenomenal and the doxastic. In contrast to other luminists, however, my strategy is not to critically focus on the refined safety condition in terms of degrees of confidence that anti‐luminists typically use in this context. Instead, I will argue that, given a certain conception of what Chalmers calls ‘direct phenomenal concepts,’ luminosity is guaranteed even if the refined safety condition in terms of degrees of confidence is taken for granted.     

Über eine neue Methode zur psychologischen Untersuchung von Menschenaffen

Ohne ZusammenfassungMit Genehmigung der Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften erscheint diese Mitteilung hier anstatt in ihren Berichten.     

Zur Psychophysik des Vergleichs und des Raumes

Ohne Zusammenfassung Mit 3 Textabbildungen.     

Nachtrag zu dem kritischen Referat «Gestalt und Kontrast»

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Zur Komplextheorie

Ohne Zusammenfassung     

Zur Boltzmannschen Theorie des zweiten Hauptsatzes

Ohne Zusammenfassung