Are children more accurate than adults? Spontaneous use of metaphor by children and adults

This study examined an observation in which children outscored adults on a series of test questions, which included unusual items such as, "Do you see with your ears?" We assumed that the adults were treating the questions metaphorically because the literally correct answer was so obvious, an assumption consistent with Grice's theory. In Study 1, we tested this assumption by manipulating pretest and test items so as to suggest, or not suggest, a metaphorical or factual response. In Study 2, we used a similar manipulation involving the order of questions of various sorts and we more directly tested the Gricean hypothesis by giving college students a reason to treat the question literally. The results replicated the previous finding in which college students' scores were lower than those of children, and the condition effects suggested that the college students' performance was due to their responding metaphorically.     

Solid-source doping of hydrogenated amorphous silicon

Abstract

Arsenic doping of hydrogenated amorphous silicon (a-Si: H) from a solid source in a remote hydrogen plasma reactor is reported. Arsenic incorporation in the deposited films was directly demonstrated with secondary-ion mass spectrometry, and doping efficiency was determined from d.c. conductivity. The electronic properties of the doped films were indistinguishable from those of conventional r.f. glow discharge deposited a-Si:H. The technique should be applicable to other dopant and alloying elements     

When hearts,hands, and feet trump brains: Centralist versus peripheralist responses in children and adults

A series of studies examined the presence of centralist versus peripheralist responding about the physical location of psychological processes. Centralists respond that processes such as cognition and emotion are a function of the brain. Peripheralists respond that such processes are located in other parts of the body, such as the heart. Although peripheralist responses declined across grade levels, even older children and adults often gave peripheralist answers, depending on the context of the questions. Peripheralist responses occurred when participants were asked about the effect of switching irrelevant body parts between two people and when they were asked to choose a different body part among four choices. Results also showed adults' responses varied with different contextual cues. The findings support a coexistence model of development which argues for the simultaneous presence of developmentally advanced reasoning or scientifically based knowledge along with presumably less advanced, intuitive‐based reasoning, or folk beliefs.