排序方式: 共有25条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
11.
12.
13.
14.
Wilfrid Hodges 《亚里斯多德学会增刊》2001,75(1):17-32
During the last forty or so years it has become popular to offer explanations of logical notions in terms of games. There is no doubt that many people find games helpful for understanding various logical phenomena. But we ask whether anything is really 'explained' by these accounts, and we analyse Paul Lorenzen's dialogue foundations for constructive logic as an example. The conclusion is that the value of games lies in their ability to provide helpful metaphors and representations, rather than in any true conceptual analysis. In fact some of the standard explanations of logical notions in terms of competitive games simply don't work. 相似文献
15.
Wilfrid I. Card 《Theoretical medicine and bioethics》1980,1(1):11-28
A rational justification for therapeutic decisions can be developed using probability and decision theory. The set of treatments and their outcomes or consequences, which are states of health, have to be defined; and estimates made of the probabilities of outcomes, their utilities, and the costs of treatments. Most difficult is the estimation of utilities of states of health but this may be possible using a ‘wagering’ technique. Until it is possible to establish some equivalence between utility and money, costs may be introduced by measuring the efficiency of treatment by comparing expected utilities per unit cost. The whole method is examined practically in a plausible clinical setting. Emphasis is laid on the value of testing the completed model using a computer to get an intimate feel of the problem using different assumptions and different values for all the parameters. 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.