Cues and control strategies in visually guided tracking

Detailed quantitative models are required to investigate the neurological basis of motor behavior. Previous studies of visually guided manual tracking have either identified a variety of control signals (cues) for planning tracking movements or analyzed how a single cue is used (i.e., one-tracking strategy). A systematic, quantitative analysis of the effects and interactions of cues in terms of human manual-tracking performance is presented here together with measurements of concomitant eye movements. These measurements help define the routes by which information reaches the CNS, and the analysis elucidates how the control signals are processed and combined. The results quantify not only the large improvement in performance observed when the target waveform being tracked is predictable but also the extent to which this improvement depends on the availability of current information about target movements and positional error. Target information is shown to provide short-term prediction independent of the error signals used in on-line negative feedback control.     

Extraction of information from continuously masked successive stimuli: An exploratory study

Results from this series of brief pilot experiments suggest that, under certain conditions, it is humanly possible to extract information from superimposed continuously masked letter strings presented successively on the VDU of a microprocessor.     

Monocular and binocular vision in the control of goal-directed movement

In the present research the authors examined the time course of binocular integration in goal-directed aiming and grasping. With liquid-crystal goggles, the authors manipulated vision independently to the right and left eyes of 10 students during movement preparation and movement execution. Contrary to earlier findings reported in catching experiments (I. Olivier, D. J. Weeks, K. L. Ricker, J. Lyons, & D. Elliott, 1998), neither a temporal nor a spatial binocular advantage was obtained in 1 grasping and 2 aiming studies. That result suggests that, at least in some circumstances, monocular vision is sufficient for the precise control of limb movements. In a final aiming experiment involving 3-dimensional spatial variability and no trial-to-trial visual feedback about performance, binocular vision was associated with greater spatial accuracy. Binocular superiority appeared to be most pronounced when participants were unable to adjust their limb control strategy or procedure on the basis of terminal feedback about performance.