Across-channel masking of changes in modulation depth for amplitude- and frequency-modulated signals

This study examines a form of masking that can take place when the signal and masker are widely separated in frequency and cannot be explained in terms of the traditional concept of the auditory filter or critical band. We refer to this as across-channel masking. The task of the subject was to detect an increment in modulation depth of a 1000-Hz sinusoidal carrier. The carrier could either be sinusoidally amplitude modulated or sinusoidally frequency modulated at a 10-Hz rate. Modulation increment thresholds of this “target” signal were measured for the target alone, and in the presence of two interfering sounds with carrier frequencies of 230 and 3300 Hz. When the interfering sounds were unmodulated, they had no effect on modulation increment thresholds. When the interfering sounds were either amplitude or frequency modulated, thresholds increased. Amplitude modulation (AM) increment thresholds were affected by both amplitude-modulated and frequency-modulated interference. Similarly, frequency modulation (FM) increment thresholds were affected by both amplitude-modulated and frequency-modulated interference. For both types of signal, the interference was tuned for modulation rate; across-channel masking was greatest when the interfering sounds were modulated at rates close to 10 Hz, and declined for higher or lower rates. However, the tuning was rather broad. When the target and interfering sounds were modulated at the same rate, there was no effect of the relative phase of the modulators. Two possible explanations for the results are discussed. One is based on the idea that carriers that are modulated in a similar way tend to be perceptually “grouped”. The other is based on the idea that there are “channels” in the auditory system tuned for AM and FM rate. Neither explanation appears completely satisfactory.     

Stopping and restarting an unfolding action at various times.

The ability to inhibit an unfolding action is usually investigated using a stop signal (or gostop) task. The data from the stop-signal task are often described using a horse-race model whose key assumption is that each process (i.e., go, stop) exhibits stochastic independence. Using three variations of a coincident-timing task (i.e., go, gostop, and gostopgo) we extend previous considerations of stochastic independence by analysing the go latencies for prior effects of stopping. On random trials in the gostopgo task the signal sweep was paused for various times at various distances before the target. Significant increases in latency errors were reported on those trials on which the signal was paused (p <.005). Further analyses of the pause trials revealed significant effects for both the stopping interval (p <.001) and the pause interval (p <.05). Tukey post hoc analyses demonstrated increased latency errors as a linear function of the stopping interval, as expected, and decreased latency errors as a nonlinear function of the pause interval. These latter results indicate that the latencies of the go process, as reflected in the latency errors, may not exhibit stochastic independence under certain conditions. Various control mechanisms were considered in an attempt to explain these data.