首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   59篇
  免费   3篇
  2019年   1篇
  2018年   1篇
  2016年   1篇
  2015年   1篇
  2014年   2篇
  2013年   2篇
  2012年   3篇
  2011年   4篇
  2010年   5篇
  2009年   3篇
  2008年   3篇
  2007年   5篇
  2006年   2篇
  2005年   2篇
  2002年   2篇
  2000年   1篇
  1999年   1篇
  1996年   1篇
  1993年   2篇
  1991年   3篇
  1990年   2篇
  1989年   1篇
  1988年   2篇
  1987年   1篇
  1986年   2篇
  1985年   2篇
  1983年   1篇
  1981年   2篇
  1980年   1篇
  1975年   2篇
  1974年   1篇
排序方式: 共有62条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
51.
52.
In a health service with limited resources we must make decisions about who to treat first. In this paper I develop a version of the restoration argument according to which those whose need for resources is a consequence of their voluntary choices should receive lower priority when it comes to health care. I then consider three possible problems for this argument based on those that have been raised against other theories of this type: that we don't know in a particular case that the illness is self‐inflicted, that it seems that all illness is self‐inflicted in the sense used in my argument, and finally that this type of approach incorporates an unacceptable moralising element if it is to avoid giving those like fire‐fighters a lower priority for treatment. I argue that the position outlined here has the resources to respond to each of these objections.  相似文献   
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
Suppose nothing exists. Then it is true that nothing exists. What makes that true? Nothing! So it seems that if nothing existed, then the principle that every truth is made true by something (the truthmaker principle) would be false. So if it is possible that nothing exists, a claim often called ‘metaphysical nihilism’, then the truthmaker principle is not necessary. This paper explores various ways to resolve this conflict without restricting metaphysical nihilism in such a way that it would become trivial and uninteresting.  相似文献   
59.
ABSTRACT It is possible to defend the death penalty for aggravated murder in more than one way, and not every defence is equally compelling. The paper takes up arguments put forward by two very distinguished advocates of the death penalty, Mill and Kant. After reviewing Mill's argument and some weaknesses in it, I shall sketch another line of reasoning that combines his conclusion with premisses to be found in Kant. The hybrid argument provides at least the basis for a sound defence of execution for the most serious murders.  相似文献   
60.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号