井田制研究理学化典范的宋代生成

宋代的理学思潮重塑了由汉代郑玄以来井田制研究的汉学典范,进而形成了一个新典范,即井田制研究的理学化典范。井田制研究的汉学典范困境和宋代理学思潮的冲击是井田制研究理学化开启的前提条件。宋代井田制研究的理学化是一个过程,又可分为两期。前期为井田制研究的理学思潮化阶段。北宋欧阳修是井田制理学化的早期实践者,他将理学批判和理学形上论运用到井田制的研究中,这是井田制研究理学化的开端。其后,宋儒井田制研究的重点是批判汉儒的方法和观点,但忽视形而上的研究,破而不立,并没有建立新典范的意识。后期是井田制研究的理学典范化阶段。南宋朱熹的研究扭转了两宋以来重批判轻形上的风气,将典范所依据的经典由《周礼》转向《孟子》;将所要诠释的井田制模式由《周礼》井田制沟洫制转为《孟子》九夫为井制;确立了以义理为本、典制为末观念为制度阐释的原则。朱熹的相关研究标志着井田制理学化典范的形成。井田制研究理学化过程是理学思潮重塑汉唐以来经学研究的面貌的过程,也是理学思潮自身调适和转向的过程。通过对井田制研究理学化过程的考察,可以丰富理学思潮如何成为典范的认知,也可以为汉学转向宋学的内在理路提供新的解释。     

Difficult name,cold man: Chinese names,gender stereotypicality and trustworthiness

Names can play an important role in forming first impressions. While much of the literature has demonstrated how alphabet-based names influence impression formation, little is known about how character-based names (e.g., Chinese names) affect interpersonal trust. Across six studies, we demonstrated that a difficult-to-recognise Chinese name with less frequently used characters activated masculine perception, which in turn decreased trust in the name holder. The masculine inferences from difficult names were replicated across within-subjects (Study 1a and 1b) and between-subjects judgements and maintained irrespective of normative knowledge about difficult names as male names (Study 1c). The mediation of gender stereotypicality was manifested in both measured spontaneous gender inference (Study 2a and Study 2b) and manipulated gender information (Study 2c). The effects of recognisability on masculine and trust perceptions were independent of pronunciationability (Study 2b). This research extends previous research by revealing the implications of character-based names and pictographic language on the feeling-as-information theory, also in terms of interpersonal contexts.     

如何处理物自体:塞拉斯和梅亚苏

物自体是康德先验哲学给我们留下的巨大谜题。本文将考察美国哲学家塞拉斯和法国哲学家梅亚苏这两位当代实在论者处理物自体的两种方式。塞拉斯的科学实在论和梅亚苏的思辨唯物论不仅为我们呈现了在后批判哲学视域下探讨物自体的不同路径("我们的"物自体和"非人的"物自体),还为我们把握他们各自的理论体系提供了基本的抓手。在充分考察这两个方案的基础上,本文还将初步探讨整合这两个方案的可能性,探讨一种能够同时容纳"科学之思"和"非人之思"的更宽泛的"思"。