Dance,Don't Interpret!: Commentary on Paper by Steven Cooper

With difficult patients who seek to engage the analyst through struggle rather than through warm connection, analysts struggle whether to interpret or contain. I use Cooper's case example to consider these two initial treatment approaches. I argue for the approach that is most difficult for all analysts—to let the patient be himself guiding us toward what he does and does not need.     

Ethical Issues in Accounting and Economics Experimental Research: Inducing Strategic Misrepresentation

Forensic psychologists face a variety of ethical issues in conducting evaluations. One such issue is attorney presence during a forensic evaluation. In forensic evaluations, it is necessary to use standardized procedures while also attending to the rights of the individuals being assessed. This article examines the neuropsychological literature on extraneous influences in evaluations including effects of attorney presence. Then the article discusses the limited knowledge about attorney presence during forensic evaluations, addresses attorney motivations for being present during an evaluation, and considers attorney presence in the context of ethical mandates. Finally, suggestions are offered for forensic clinicians confronted with attorneys who wish to be present during assessments.     

The wayte Method for Investigating self-perceptions

The Who-Are-You Technique of investigating self-perceptions was extended into past, future, and ideal dimensions by additionally asking subjects Who have you been, Who will you be, and Who would you like to be. Who-Are-You-Time-Extension (WAYTE) comparisons of 232 prisoners, 55 Army Neuropsychiatric specialists, 77 college men, and 67 college women were made for twelve scoring categories and for contentment across time. Patterns of differences were noted and the WAYTE method was viewed as having potential for further self-concept research.