Effect of changing the unconditioned stimulus on appetitive blocking

In four experiments we examined the effects of changing the unconditioned stimulus (US) on appetitive blocking. In Experiments 1A, 1B, and 2 we established that substituting food for water, or water for food, in the compound stage did not attenuate blocking relative to groups that received the same US throughout conditioning. Experiment 3 showed that satiation with the US used prior to compound conditioning with a different US does not affect blocking. Experiment 4 revealed that changing the location of US delivery, as well as the quality of the US, also leaves blocking unaffected. It is suggested that these results demonstrate that blocking occurs, provided that there is no change in the affective properties of the US.     

The influence of passive preexposure on escape from a Morris pool

In 3 experiments rats were preexposed to the landmarks that surround a Morris pool by being placed on a submerged platform within the pool. They were then required to escape from the pool by swimming to the platform, which was in a location that had not been used during preexposure. Preexposure facilitated subsequent escape from the pool, provided that the platform was not moved during preexposure and the relative position of the landmarks to each other remained constant throughout preexposure. In contrast, if during preexposure the platform was moved from session to session (Experiment 1), or the array of landmarks was altered unsystematically from trial to trial (Experiments 2 and 3), then subsequent learning to escape from the pool was disrupted. These findings suggest that the effects of preexposure to the landmarks in a Morris pool is determined by whether or not they are of relevance for identifying the location of the platform. When they are relevant, then subsequent learning is facilitated, but when they are irrelevant, then subsequent learning is disrupted.     

Effects of practice on the matching familiar figures test: A comparison of young,middle-aged and elderly adults

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of practice on a modified version of the Matching Familiar Figures test in young, middle-aged and elderly adults. Forty-eight young, 48 middle-aged and 48 elderly adults were each presented with 48 match-to-standard items. the dependent variables were the number of errors committed and the latency to first response. the performance of both young and middle-aged adults reflected rather stable speed/accuracy trade-off decisions that did not change as a function of practice. the young adults responded more quickly and made more errors than the middle-aged adults across all 48 trials. the performance of elderly adults, on the other hand, did change as a result of practice; their latencies increased and their error rate decreased across trials. Elderly adults started out making more errors than young adults but by the end of the 48 trials, their error rate was lower than that of young adults. In the final trials, the error rate of elderly adults was midway between the rates of young and middle-aged adults. Thus, practice facilitated the performance of elderly adults but had no effect on the performance of young and middle-aged adults.     

Selective transfer of responding in conditional discriminations

In each of three experiments rats received discrimination training in which whether or not a 10-sec target stimulus was followed by food was signalled by a 2-min background stimulus. In the first experiment the target was paired with food in the presence but not the absence of the background stimulus. Subsequent tests revealed that the background elevated responding to a target that had taken part in a similar discrimination. However, it had no influence on the responses elicited by a partially reinforced conditioned stimulus. In the remaining experiments the target was paired with food in the absence but not the presence of the background. Test trials then revealed that although the background had an inhibitory influence on the responses elicited by a target from a similar discrimination, it had no influence on the responses elicited by either a partially or a continuously reinforced conditioned stimulus. Various explanations for this selective influence of a background stimulus are considered.     

Similarity and Discrimination Learning

The role played by similarity in discrimination learning was examined in four experiments using compound stimuli. In Experiment 1, pigeons received training in which food was presented after stimulus A, compound AB, but not compound ABC—A+ BC+ ABCo. The A+ ABCo discrimination was acquired more readily than was the BC+ ABCo discrimination. In the remaining experiments, training was of the form, A+ B+ C+ AB+ AC+ BC+ ABCo. The discrimination between the single stimuli A+ B+ C+ and ABCo consistently developed more readily than between the pairs of stimuli AB+ AC+ BC+, and ABCo. The results are shown to be more consistent with a configural than with an elemental theory of conditioning.