Can there be one-way causal conditionship?

I defend my attempt to explain causal priority by means of one-way causal conditionship by answering an argument by J. A. Cover about Charles' law. Then I attempt to say what makes a philosophical analysis a counterfactual analysis, so I can understand Cover's claim that my account is at its base a counterfactual one. Finally I examine Cover's discussion of my contention that necessary for in the circumstances is nontransitive.     

Events of parental divorce: Stressfulness ratings by children,parents, and clinicians

The stressfulness, for the "typical" child, of 62 events that occur to children of divorce was rated by children of divorce (n = 58), their custodial parents (n = 58), and clinicians (n = 50). In addition, a larger group of children (n = 123) rated the goodness or badness of the events that had happened to them. The rank orderings of the mean stress ratings for the typical child made by children, parents, and clinicians were highly correlated. However, when the absolute stress value of the events was compared across raters, children rated 10 events as significantly less stressful than did parents (p less than .05); parents' and clinicians' ratings differed for 9 events, parents rating 7 as less stressful (p less than .05). Children rated 19 events as less stressful than did clinicians (p less than .05). The rank ordering of the children's mean ratings of events actually experienced correlated highly with the rank orderings of the children's mean ratings of the negative events for the typical child.     

Relation between reported maternal caffeine consumption during pregnancy and neonatal state and heart rate

Regression analyses showed that prenatal caffeine exposure in 50 neonates was predictive of higher heart rates overall and during quiet and active sleep after the effects of alcohol, nicotine and SES, and maternal age were statistically controlled. Separate effects also showed that lower SES was related to higher neonatal heart rates.     

The Relevance of Discriminatory Knowledge of Content

Those interested in securing the compatibility of anti-individualism and introspective knowledge of content (henceforth 'compatibilists') typically make a distinction between knowledge of content proper (KC) and discriminatory knowledge of content (DKC). Following Falvey and Owens (1994), most compatibilists allow that anti-individualism is not compatible with introspective DKC, but maintain that nonetheless anti-individualism is compatible with introspective KC. Though I have raised doubts about the compatibility of anti-individualism and introspective KC elsewhere (Goldberg, 1997 and forthcoming), here my aim is to suggest the philosophical relevance of DKC itself. My thesis is that there are cases in which a thinker's failing to have DKC will affect the justification which she takes herself to have in drawing various inferences in the course of her reasoning, and so will affect that reasoning itself. After presenting illustrative examples and suggesting why anti-individualists themselves ought to acknowledge this point, I suggest that the examples indicate further work for anti-individualists: formulating what it takes to have DKC, and substantiating the view (widely held by anti-individualists) that anti-individualism's implication that we (often) lack such knowledge is not to be taken as an important weakness of anti-individualism itself.     

An independence of mechanism in the origins of reading and classification-related semantic distance effects

Some members of prespecified classes are accepted as members more rapidly than others. This has normally been ascribed to processes operating at a stage where the members are evaluated with respect to the category. An alternative locus could be at an “encoding” stage. It is shown with two experiments that this seems most unlikely, and evidence emerges to support the idea that word-naming and classification tasks show a crucial independence of process. It would seem to be necessary to reevaluate any simplistic notions of processing stages in semantic verification tasks.     

The accessibility of pronominal antecedents as a function of episode shifts in narrative text

One of the characteristics of connected discourse is that entities introduced are often referred to again at a later point. Such anaphoric reference clearly necessitates a memory representation of the prior text, so that the new reference can be established as coreferential with the old. In this paper, a distinction is made between people introduced in a narrative who depend upon a particular setting in order to be interpreted (scenario-dependent entities), and those who do not (main characters). It is argued that the availability of representations of these two types of character in working memory will depend upon whether the text indicates a change in setting to have occurred. Two experiments are described which show that dependent entities become less available if a change has occurred, while main characters are not so affected. The first study uses incidence of mention in a passage continuation procedure as an index of availability, while the second uses reading time and question-answering latencies. The experiments rule out any simple view that availability depends only upon how far back in the text a character was mentioned, and illustrate how passage of time in a narrative serves as a cue for recognizing the end of an episode.     

The problem of reinterpretive distortions in group psychotherapy with borderline patients

Group psychotherapy with borderline patients is challenging work. A group in which the core of patients falls within this nosological category is described. The phrase reinterpretive distortion is used to characterize an aspect of these patients' communication style which makes their effective treatment quite difficult. Examples of the phenomenon are offered, as is an explanation of the dynamics which give rise to it and the functions it seems to serve. Effective ways to deal with reinterpretive distortions in the group psychotherapy context are suggested.     

The influence of response compatibility on a semantic classification task

An experiment was carried out in which Ss had to decide whether or not a target word was a member of a prespecified semantic category. Poorly representative, or low conjoint frequency (LCF) exemplars were accepted less rapidly than representative, or high conjoint frequency (HCF) exemplars. This effect was considerably enhanced by requiring an incompatible response in which the Ss were asked to say ‘No’ when the target was a member of the category. The results show that the category membership judgement is a natural affirmative, and that the semantic distance effect of conjoint frequency has a magnitude dependent upon the processing demands of the task in which it is measured. The results are discussed in relation to theories of the mechanisms of category membership judgements. It is suggested that the influence of compatibility may be in load sharing between activation of a response rule and the judgement task per se.