Editorial Preface

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion -     

Retrospective revaluation effects in the conditioned suppression procedure

In four experiments using the conditioned suppression procedure, rats received initial reinforced training with two compound stimuli, AX and BY, each compound consisting of one auditory and one visual element. After a second phase of training consisting of nonreinforced presentations of A, the suppression governed by X and Y was tested. In Experiment 1 X evoked slightly less suppression than Y (a mediated extinction effect). This outcome was obtained when the auditory cues served as Xand Y(Experiment 1a), when the visual cues served as Xand Y(Experiment 1b), and when the number of nonreinforced presentations of Awas increased (Experiment 1c) from 18 to 216. In Experiment 2, however, in which the initial training was given with serial compounds (i.e., A ⇒ X and B ⇒ Y) X evoked more suppression than Y (a recovery-from-overshadowing effect). It was argued that extinction of A engages two learning processes, one increasing the effective associative strength of its associate (X) and one reducing it, and that the balance between these two depends on the specific conditions of training.     

Book reviews

DICKINSON,A. and BOAKES,R. A. (Eds). Mechanisms of Learning and Motivation: A Memorial Volume to Jerzy Konorski. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum Associates. 1979. Pp xiii+468. ISBN 0 470 26567 I. £18.25.

SLUCKIN, W. Fear in Animals and Man. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 1979. Pp 317. ISBN 0 442 30164 2. £12.00.     

Naïve realism and capturing the “wisdom of dyads”

Two studies provided evidence for the role of naïve realism in the failure of individuals to give adequate weight to peer input, and explored two strategies for reducing the impact of this inferential bias. Study 1 demonstrated that dyad members see their own estimates as more “objective” than those of their partners and that this difference in perceived objectivity predicts the degree of underweighting. Compelling participants to assess their own versus their partners' objectivity prior to revising estimates decreased underweighting, an effect that was mediated by differences in perceived objectivity. Study 2 showed that the increase in accuracy that results from requiring dyad members to offer joint estimates via discussion is largely retained in subsequent individual estimates. Both studies showed that underweighting is greater when dyad members disagree on the issue about which they are making consensus estimates—a finding that further supports a “naïve realism” interpretation of the phenomenon.