排序方式: 共有11条查询结果,搜索用时 0 毫秒
11.
Johannes Roessler 《Philosophical explorations》2014,17(3):346-357
On a widely held view, the canonical way to make sense of intentional actions is to invoke the agent's ‘motivating reasons’, where the claim that X did A for some ‘motivating reason’ is taken to be neutral on whether X had a normative reason to do A. In this paper, I explore a challenge to this view, drawing on Anscombe's ‘second-personal’ approach to the nature of action explanation. 相似文献