Answer Sets and Qualitative Decision Making

Logic programs under answer set semantics have become popular as a knowledge representation formalism in Artificial Intelligence. In this paper we investigate the possibility of using answer sets for qualitative decision making. Our approach is based on an extension of the formalism, called logic programs with ordered disjunction (LPODs). These programs contain a new connective called ordered disjunction. The new connective allows us to represent alternative, ranked options for problem solutions in the heads of rules: A × B intuitively means: if possible A, but if A is not possible then at least B. The semantics of logic programs with ordered disjunction is based on a preference relation on answer sets. We show that LPODs can serve as a basis for qualitative decision making.     

Bindungstheorie und Psychoanalyse

Bowlby’s attachment theory and more recent versions of it are examined from an epistemological viewpoint and subjected to questioning on whether they are in line with central psychoanalytic concepts. It is argued that Bowlby’s basic tenets regarding attachment theory, which later attachment theorists never seriously questioned, do not conform to scientific standards, and that psychoanalytic issues such as the dynamic unconscious, internal conflicts, the interaction between drive wishes and defence in establishing substitutive formations are either ignored or not treated in sufficient depth. In the light of this, the assertion that psychoanalytic criticism of attachment theory arose from mutual misunderstandings and is outdated nowadays stands the matter on its head: psychoanalytic criticism can only be regarded as outdated if either psychoanalysis, or attachment theory or both are misunderstood.     

Berufsgruppen- und methodenintegrierende Teamarbeit in der stationären psychodynamischen Psychotherapie

Zusammenfassung Die über 50-jährige Entwicklung der stationären psychodynamischen Psychotherapie ist ein Prozess von der Anwendung ambulanter psychoanalytischer Verfahren auf der Station zu einem eigenständigen multiprofessionellen, multimethodalen Therapieverfahren. Die Rahmenbedingungen der Organisation Krankenhaus und das jeweilige psychoanalytische Verständnis des Leiters der Abteilung zur Nutzung des multipersonellen Therapiefelds prägte die psychodynamischen Konzeptionen. Die Entwicklung führte zu einer Formulierung einer Komplexbehandlung für stationäre Psychotherapie im Prozedurenkatalog der DRGs. Ein Herzstück der integrativen stationären psychodynamischen Therapie ist das multiprofessionelle Team. An 2 Beispielen von therapeutischen Funktionen des multiprofessionellen Teams wird die gemeinsame Aufgabenstellung des Teams dargestellt. Darüber hinaus werden Regeln aus gruppenanalytischer Sicht für die Leitung eines solchen multiprofessionellen Teams vorgeschlagen.     

Belastungen in der Kindheit und in der Jugend Essgestörter

Depending on definition and sample, a minority of varying size of women with eating disorders report to be victims of sexual and/or physical abuse. These stressful experiences are risk factors for mental disorders in general and not specifically for eating disorders. Parental high expectations and pre-morbid negative self-evaluation seem to be specific risk factors for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Probably, patients with bulimia nervosa suffered more childhood adversity than those with restrictive anorexia nervosa. Patients with a history of sexual and/or physical abuse may be more severely ill and more difficult to treat than other patients with eating disorders. Careful questioning about childhood adversity seems advisable. In therapy, maintaining factors—like problems of self-esteem—are more important than predisposing or precipitating factors. For prevention, it is recommended to provide for the safety of children when treating their parents with mental illness—particularly substance use disorders—and to avoid parental high expectations.     

Die Zweite Moderne und die Angewandte Kriminologie

This article analyses the recent changes in modern society (??second modernity??) and their importance for criminological questions. These changes increase the risk of biographical crises of individuals which can result in the committing of crimes. Therefore, a review of the diagnostic and prognostic system of ??applied criminology?? was necessary. As a result the ??applied criminology?? had to be adapted and a new biographical type of ??crime in crises?? was deduced from this review. The value orientation and individual relevant aspects, for example special places, persons or strong interests, play a key role in appraising the new biographical type of ??crime in crises??. This new type fits to the developments of the second modernity and completes the system of ??applied criminology??.     

Qualit?tssicherung in der Glaubhaftigkeitsbeurteilung

This article analyzes various levels of the quality discussion that are relevant for credibility assessment. On the highest level, the German Federal Supreme Court's (BGH) leading decision on scientific standards for psychological credibility assessment in 1999 has been exceptionally influential. The particular impact of this decision is that it does not just list general demands or name which topics need to be addressed, but lays down specific methodological standards. This has countered a frequent error in the past: namely, that of treating probabilistic indicators as if they were nomological laws. On the concrete level, the instrument known as the critical appraisal of methods (methodenkritische Stellungnahme) has frequently been used to uncover the quality deficits in existing expert's reports. The article points out that although a critical appraisal of methods is also a scientific instrument that has to meet minimum quality standards, these standards have not always been met in practice. Nonetheless, the best outcome of a specification of quality standards is the application in practice of the current state of knowledge in a discipline. Therefore, it has to be stressed that a viable quality discussion depends crucially on the allocation of sufficient research resources to engage in the evaluation and further development of diagnostic strategies for single-case assessments.     

Standardisierte Dokumentation als Methode der Qualit?tssicherung

Quality assurance is one of the recurrent topics in forensic psychiatry and the first methods used were systematic documentation and the development of structured assessment and documentation instruments. In German speaking countries the forensic psychiatric documentation system (FPDS) was derived essentially from the AMDP (working group for methods and documentation in psychiatry) system used in clinical psychiatry and consisted of a modular instrument with a basic module and additional ones for the assessment of violent offenders or of sex offenders for risk assessment etc. The development of comparable instruments became especially popular for risk assessment in different settings and for different offender populations. Even more important was that it initiated a platform for scientific exchange, producing a reliable data base, structured training in forensic psychiatry and evaluation of expert reports. Systematic documentation using instruments was often criticized for reducing information and overlooking the complexity of the problems encountered in forensic psychiatry. The critics, however, often do not seem to be aware of the real quality of forensic assessments and reports, of the variety or of the minimal information they often contain. Systematic documentation serves to find a common language among the experts and the courts to improve the assessment of reliability and validity of the information provided, to establish minimal requirements for the formulation of reports and to prove professionally correct handling of cases in litigation against an expert.