Avoidant attachment and hemispheric lateralisation of the processing of attachment‐ and emotion‐related words

Studies of adult attachment indicate that intimacy avoidance is associated with general negative emotionality and withdrawal from potentially positive aspects of social relations. Such emotional negativity and withdrawal motivation have been connected in psychophysiological studies with the right frontal lobe of the brain, whereas the left frontal lobe specialises in emotional positivity and approach behaviour. In the present study we used a divided visual field task to investigate hemispheric asymmetries in making decisions about the positivity or negativity of attachment‐ and emotion‐related words, as well as various kinds of control words. We found that more avoidant individuals made more errors when judging positive attachment‐related words presented to the right hemisphere. The findings are discussed in terms of possible effects of attachment history on the way attachment‐related information is processed in the brain.     

Suicide in the Medically Ill

“The undiscover'd country, from whose bourn No traveler returns puzzles the will, And makes us rather bear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of?” (Hamlet III, i)     

Complex movement patterns: Learning retention and sources of error in recall

In this study of kinaesthesis, the learning, retention, and recall of complex patterns was examined. Subjects were blindfolded, held a stylus in the right hand, and moved around stencil patterns, either actively or passively. The patterns were recalled with a free active movement of the right hand, after various amounts of practice, immediately or after a 60-s interval, once or twice in succession, with and without visual guidance. The shape and size of the drawings was compared with the criterion patterns. The effect of practice varied depending on whether the criterion movement was active or passive, and on the measure of recall performance. Even when the criterion patterns were freely practised, the recall traces showed large errors in shape and systematic shrinkage in size, and there were large individual differences. Regardless of these errors, recall performance was reliable. The effect of an unfilled retention interval varied as a function of practice. When the patterns were recalled under visual guidance, there was no shrinkage in the size of the drawings.     

Why the Brits are in two minds about therapy

Professor Frank Furedi is the author of a number of popular sociological discourses with a common theme that can be broadly summarised as betraying discomfort with 21st century western society's preoccupation with risk management. In this article, his arguments concerning the nature of what he calls 'therapy culture' are deconstructed for their essential conservative bias and persistent misunderstanding of the nature of modern psychological therapy. Three years ago, Furedi characterised counselling as 'one of the biggest cons of modern life' in conversation with the Health Editor of the Independent newspaper. My text highlights (1) the paucity of his evidence for this assertion and (2) his misguided grasp of the thrust of therapy since counselling is a difficult option whose sole goal is the stronger individualism and independence of the client—qualities he otherwise claims to admire.