Early contributions to infants’ mental rotation abilities

Some cognitive abilities exhibit reliable gender differences, with females outperforming males in specific aspects of verbal ability, and males showing an advantage on certain spatial tasks. Among these cognitive gender differences, differences in mental rotation are the most robust, and appear to be present even in infants. A large body of animal research suggests that gonadal hormones, particularly testosterone, during early development could contribute to this gender difference in mental rotation. Also, substantial evidence supports an influence of socialization on mental rotation performance. The present study investigated the relationship of two types of factors, early postnatal testosterone exposure and parental attitudes about gender, to mental rotation performance in 61 healthy infants (29 males, 32 females). We measured salivary testosterone at two time points: 1–2.5 months of age and 5–6 months of age. Infants’ mental rotation performance and parents’ attitudes about gender were assessed at 5–6 months of age. As predicted, testosterone concentrations were significantly higher in boys than girls in early infancy (d = 0.54), and boys performed significantly better than girls on mental rotation (d = 0.64). A significant positive correlation between testosterone at age 1–2.5 months and mental rotation was found only in boys (r = 0.50, p = .01). A significant negative correlation between parents’ gender‐stereotypical attitudes and mental rotation performance was found only in girls (r = ?.57, p = .002). These findings suggest that the early postnatal testosterone surge (also known as “mini‐puberty”) may have organizational influences on mental rotation performance in boys, and that parents may influence their daughters’ mental rotation abilities beginning very early in life.     

Emotion Socialization in Cross‐Cultural Perspective

Emotion socialization aims to promote children’s emotion competence. Children’s competence is embedded in cultural contexts that influence caregivers’ expectations of appropriateness of children’s expression and experience of emotions. Two aspects of emotion competence – individualistic and relational emotion competence – are outlined. They offer a theoretical framework to interpret cultural commonalities and differences in emotion socialization strategies. This review summarizes current knowledge about caregivers’ emotion socialization strategies toward children’s negative emotional expressions and related behaviors in cultural perspective. The number of empirical studies in cultures outside of United States remains low. Nonetheless, the available evidence describes a range of emotion socialization strategies that are embedded in caregiving, and their consequences for children’s emotion development. Besides several commonalities across cultures, we describe differences in the degree to which strategies are endorsed by caregivers as well as some of the qualitative information that point to cultural variations. Finally, we note gaps in the literature and suggest future research directions.     

Distance,Contact, and Intergenerational Relationships: Grandparents and Adult Grandchildren from an International Perspective

In previous studies of intergenerational relationships, geographic distance has been considered the most obvious factor influencing opportunity for frequency of contact between grandparents and grandchildren. This study presents findings from a survey of 70 international college students in the Unites States regarding perceived grandparental influence and relationship satisfaction with their “closest” grandparent. Results showed that participants' perceived influence of grandparents and relationship satisfaction was maintained despite decreased contact between grandparents and grandchildren. In addition, grandchildren who initiated contact were found to have a significant impact on relationship satisfaction. This study provides an understanding of distance, contact, and intergenerational relationships in an international context.     

Reinstatement of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus: two roles for context

The authors studied the role of context in reinstatement. Freezing was reinstated when the conditioned stimulus (CS) was extinguished in 1 context and rats moved to another context for reexposure to the shock unconditioned stimulus (US) and test. It was also reinstated (rather than renewed) when rats were shocked in the extinction context and moved to another context for test. This reinstatement was CS specific and reduced by nonreinforced exposures to the extinction context. Rats shocked in the context in which a stimulus had been preexposed froze when tested in another context. These findings suggest 2 roles for context in reinstatement: conditioning of the test context (M. E. Bouton, 1993) and mediated conditioning by the extinction context (P. C. Holland, 1990).     

Compound figures: priority and speech-act structure

Compound figures are a rich, and under-explored area for tackling fundamental issues in philosophy of language. This paper explores new ideas about how to explain some features of such figures. We start with an observation from Stern (2000) that in ironic-metaphor, metaphor is logically prior to irony in the structure of what is communicated. Call this thesis Logical-MPT. We argue that a speech-act-based explanation of Logical-MPT is to be preferred to a content-based explanation. To create this explanation we draw on Barker’s (2004) expressivist speech-act theory, in which speech-acts build on other speech-acts to achieve the desired communicative effects. In particular, we show how Barker’s general ideas explain metaphor as an assertive-act, and irony as a ridiculing-act. We use Barker’s notion of proto-illocutionary-acts to show how metaphorical-acts and ironic-acts can build one on the other. Finally, we show that while an ironic-act can build on a metaphorical-act, a metaphorical-act cannot build on an ironic-act. This restriction on how they can be composed establishes Logical-MPT via a different route.     

QT & RR variability spots the earliest autonomic deregulation in diabetes. Fading of vagal sino-atrial drive but not of sympathetic ventricular responsiveness to life challenges.

27 consecutive insulin-dependent diabetic patients (pts), under 50 years, with blood glucose controlled within normal limits and no significant or multiple cardiovascular/neurological complications in the lights of clinical tests, went through a protocol as follows: laiddown at relaxed rest for 10 min, then stood-up quietly for 7 min, and finally experienced a stress-interview for 10 min while supine. A thoracic ECG lead was digitized at I ms (Codas, Dataq Instr.), RR and QT intervals were software-detected, resampled at 500 ms, and Fourier-transformed over 3 min epochs to get auto-or cross-spectra. RR-by-QT mean square coherence detached the RR-independent fraction of QT low fequency (LF) spectral power, called idioventricular QT-LF. We detected autonomic impairment of three types (discriminant score = 92.31%), presumably differentiated upon the locus of lesion, using RR's basal variance and mean RR shortening when standing as follows: (I) RR shortening > 200 ms in 10 pts; (II) normal RR shortening but no RR variance in 4 pts; (III) stiff RR around 600 ms and no RR variance in 2 pts. The above pts have been excluded from further analysis. The remaining 11 pts with no such impairments (5M and 6F, 36.4 y +/- 4.4 SD, history of 6.0 y +/- 5.2) have been compared with 11 normal subjects in an age and gender-paired control group in two steps. Step 1: Preliminary MANOVA/ANOVA showed significant effects on the ensemble of spectral variables of every single factor (status: normal or patient group; intervention; gender) with no significant factor interactions. Significant effects of intervention or status on main RR spectral variables and on a few QT spectral variables were also documented. Step 2: Non-parametric tests showed that diabetics had (mildly to moderately) shorter mean RR, while their RR-LF was always significantly lower than those found in normals--a difference propagated to QT-LF but not to idioventricular QT-LF. In the intra-group there were similar responses to interventions except stress with respect to mean RR. Consistent reduction in RR-LF under moderate or no change in mean RR suggests vagal down- regulation that, judging by idioventricular QT-LF showing, goes perhaps before a similar process with sympathetic control of ventricles. This phase delay may introduce an early arrhythmic risk worth dealing with in secondary prevention.     

The dynamic infrastructure of mind—A hypothesis and some of its applications

A mechanism underlying the computational properties of the cognitive architecture is construed based on a minimal list of operational clusters. This general processing mechanism constitutes the dynamic infrastructure of mind (DIM). DIM consists in categories of mental operations foundational for learning that contain inborn components called inner operations, which are self-developing in the interaction mind-environment. Within the DIM paradigm, the input cognitive systems are not domain specific or core-knowledge specific, they are operational specific and capable of further developments that become domain specific while experiencing the environment. Arguments for this construal come from three sources: literature review, data collected through classroom observations, and a four-year experimental study of teaching and learning mathematics in primary grades. The outcomes of that experiment led to a methodology of learning based on activating the operational infrastructure of mind, which enhances students' flexibility of thinking and predicts the capacity to solve creatively a variety of problems.     

Compound Figures: A Multi-Channel View of Communication and Psychological Plausibility

Topoi - Philosophical views of language have traditionally been focused on notions of truth. This is a reconstructive view in that we try to extract from an utterance in context what the sentence...     

New behavioral protocols to extend our knowledge of rodent object recognition memory

Animals often show an innate preference for novelty. This preference facilitates spontaneous exploration tasks of novelty discrimination (recognition memory). In response to limitations with standard spontaneous object recognition procedures for rodents, a new task (“bow-tie maze”) was devised. This task combines features of delayed nonmatching-to-sample with spontaneous exploration. The present study explored aspects of object recognition in the bow-tie maze not amenable to standard procedures. Two rat strains (Lister Hooded, Dark Agouti) displayed very reliable object recognition in both the light and dark, with the Lister Hooded strain showing superior performance (Experiment 1). These findings reveal the potential contribution of tactile and odor cues in object recognition. As the bow-tie maze task permits multiple trials within a session, it was possible to derive forgetting curves both within-session and between-sessions (Experiment 1). In Experiment 2, rats with hippocampal or fornix lesions performed at normal levels on the basic version of the recognition task, contrasting with the marked deficits previously seen after perirhinal cortex lesions. Next, the training protocol was adapted (Experiment 3), and this modified version was used successfully with mice (Experiment 4). The overall findings demonstrate the efficacy of this new behavioral task and advance our understanding of object recognition.Understanding the neural basis of recognition memory, the ability to discriminate whether a stimulus is novel or familiar, is heavily reliant on animal research. Here, advances have been closely tied to the introduction of new behavioral tests. The preeminent example concerns one-trial tests of recognition memory for monkeys using delayed nonmatching-to-sample (Mishkin and Delacour 1975). These tasks reward the natural preference that monkeys have for selecting novel items and permit multiple recognition trials within a single session. These features make the task relatively easy to train and then maximize findings from small group sizes. Although rat tasks closely based on delayed nonmatching-to-sample have been devised (Aggleton 1985; Mumby et al. 1990; Steckler et al. 1998; Prusky et al. 2004), they are very rarely employed as they are difficult to train and performance levels are unreliable.Almost all studies of rodent recognition memory now employ the spontaneous object recognition test and its direct variants (Ennaceur and Delacour 1988; Dix and Aggleton 1999; Winters et al. 2008). These tasks again take advantage of an innate preference for novel items, but this preference is displayed by spending more time exploring novel than familiar stimuli. In the standard version of the task, a rodent (rat or mouse) is placed in an arena containing two identical objects and then freely allowed to explore these objects for several minutes (“sample” phase). After a delay, the rodent is placed back in the arena (“test” phase), which now contains one familiar object (a copy of the sample phase objects) and a novel object. Recognition is signified by greater exploration of the novel object. Because the task measures spontaneous behavior, it requires minimal pretraining, but for the same reason it is prone to considerable variance. Unlike delayed nonmatching-to-sample, each trial (sample plus test phase) takes many minutes, and so only one recognition trial is normally given per session. Advantages are that proactive interference between objects is minimized, and the one-trial design lends itself to episodic-like tests of memory (Dere et al. 2005; Good et al. 2007). Disadvantages include the fact that data accumulation, with appropriate counterbalancing, is slow.To address these limitations, a new object recognition test using a “bow-tie maze” (Fig. 1A) has been developed for rats (Albasser et al. 2010). This test combines features of delayed nonmatching-to-sample with spontaneous object preference: It permits multiple trials per session, but the measure of recognition comes from the preferential exploration of novelty. The rat is first placed in one end of a bow-tie–shaped maze that contains a single object (object A; Fig. 1B). After a minute, the rat is allowed to run to the other end of the maze where there are two dissimilar objects (A and B; Fig. 1B). Object A is familiar as it is identical to the object previously explored, while object B is novel. Consequently, a rat will typically prefer to explore object B. On the next trial, a minute later, the rat shuttles back to the initial start point, but this time encounters objects B and C. Object B is now familiar, while object C is novel. The next trial, 1 min later, is between object C (now familiar) and object D (novel), and so on. A food reward placed under every object promotes shuttling back and forth within the maze, and encourages interaction with the objects. Unlike delayed nonmatching-to-sample, the food reward is not contingent on first selecting the novel object.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.(A) Schematic of the bow-tie maze. A sliding door separates the two ends of the maze in which two objects are placed. (B) General procedure showing the presentation order of the objects in the standard object recognition task. All objects are rewarded (+). (Arrow) Rat movements. (Black print) Novel objects, (gray print) familiar objects.The present study used the bow-tie maze to explore recognition memory on four fronts. In Experiment 1, recognition in the light and recognition in the dark were compared to help determine the cues available to detect object familiarity. It is known that rats can perform recognition tasks when solely reliant on visual cues (Aggleton 1985; Bartko et al. 2007; Winters and Reid 2010), but object recognition based on other modalities remains largely unexplored (Winters and Reid 2010). Potential cues for recognition include odor differences and tactile information. It is known that rats can discriminate novel from familiar olfactory cues (Otto and Eichenbaum 1992; Kesner et al. 2002; Fortin et al. 2004; Wolff et al. 2006), while tactile (e.g., vibrissae) cues can be used to distinguish surfaces (e.g., Birrell and Brown 2000). The bow-tie maze is ideal for studying object recognition in the dark as the rats are rewarded for visiting items in set locations (to receive food rewards), and so should readily approach the objects. In contrast, running the standard spontaneous object recognition test (in an arena) in the dark would be problematic as it is not clear how the rats would first appreciate the presence of the to-be-discriminated objects.An additional goal of Experiment 1 was to determine how readily the bow-tie maze could be used to compile within-session and between-session forgetting curves. A limitation with the standard spontaneous object task is that with only one trial per session it can be very time consuming to create forgetting curves, while within-session forgetting curves for individual animals are not feasible. These shortcomings create limitations when examining manipulations thought to affect memory. The possibility of deriving within-session forgetting curves is particularly appealing as: (1) it minimized the impact of those factors that introduce variance when performance is compared across sessions, and (2) the animal need not be removed from the maze, which could additionally disrupt performance, e.g., by increasing stress. A further component of Experiment 1 manipulated object memory strength by presenting objects either once (“single”) or six times (“repeated”). Recognition was tested after a 3-h delay with the twin goals of determining whether repeated presentation would aid performance and whether these performance levels would be sufficiently above chance so that they could be used to examine factors involved in longer term memory.At the same time, Experiment 1 provided the opportunity to compare two rat strains, Dark Agouti (DA) and Lister Hooded (LH). Previous studies suggest that the Dark Agouti strain might be particularly good at visual recognition tasks (Aggleton 1996), though others have argued that this strain has aberrant behavioral properties, including higher anxiety and higher levels of inappropriate nonspatial behaviors in spatial learning tasks (Mechan et al. 2002; Harker and Whishaw 2004; but see Aggleton and Vann 2004).Experiment 2 examined the ability of rats with either hippocampal or fornix lesions to perform object recognition in the bow-tie maze. There is a longstanding debate over the impact of hippocampal damage on recognition memory, with mixed findings coming from spontaneous object recognition tests (Clark et al. 2000; Mumby 2001; Gaskin et al. 2003; Winters et al. 2008). The bow-tie maze should prove informative as numerous trials can be run to assess the impact of selective brain lesions. Although in this initial study only short retention delays were examined, these same delays and conditions are highly sensitive to perirhinal cortex lesions (Aggleton et al. 2010; Horne et al. 2010), a brain region regarded as vital for recognition memory (Brown and Aggleton 2001). In Experiment 3 the training protocol changed so that objects did not cover food rewards. Rather, a single food reward was always placed between the test objects. This modification was examined because: (1) it would preclude any exploration scores that were simply derived from attempts to move the test objects in order to uncover the food reward, and (2) it would introduce a task variant that might be amenable to small rodents not able to move objects. Accordingly, Experiment 4 examined the performance of mice (strain C57Bl/6) on a test of object recognition based on the modified version of the bow-tie maze from Experiment 3.