Institutional care and iron deficiency increase ADHD symptomology and lower IQ 2.5–5 years post‐adoption

Increased ADHD symptomology and lower IQ have been reported in internationally adopted (IA) children compared to non‐adopted peers (Hostinar, Stellern, Schaefer, Carlson & Gunnar, 2012; Kreppner, O'Connor & Rutter, 2001). However, it is unclear whether these outcomes are due to institutional deprivation specifically or to co‐occurring micronutrient deficiencies that disrupt brain development (Fuglestad, Rao & Georgieff, 2008b). In this study, IA children were compared to children raised in their biological families to examine differences in ADHD symptomology and IQ 2.5–5 years post‐adoption and to assess the contributions of iron deficiency (ID) and duration of deprivation to these cognitive outcomes. ADHD symptoms (parent‐ and experimenter‐reported) and IQ were evaluated in 88 IA (M = 62.1 months, SD = 2.4) and 35 non‐adopted children (M = 61.4 months, SD = 1.6). IA children were assessed 29–64 months post‐adoption (M = 41.9 months, SD = 10.2). ID was assessed during the initial post‐adoption medical visit in 69 children, and children were classified into four groups by iron status, ranging from normal to ID anemia (most severe). IA children had greater ADHD symptomology, p < .01, and lower IQ, p = .001, than non‐adopted children. Within the IA group, children with more severe ID at adoption had greater ADHD symptomology, r(69) = 0.40, p = .001, and lower IQ, r(68) = −0.28, p < .05. Duration of institutional care was positively correlated with ADHD symptoms, r(86) = .28, p < .01, but not IQ, r(85) = −.08, p = .52. Longitudinal results indicate improvement in IQ from 12 months post‐adoption to age 5 for children with greater ID severity at adoption and longer duration of institutional care but no improvement in ADHD symptoms. These results signify continuing effects of early deprivation and ID on ADHD symptoms and IQ years after adoption. A video abstract of this article can be viewed at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUFDAS3DD1c     

Does change in perceptions of peer teen dating violence predict change in teen dating violence perpetration over time?

Research has previously demonstrated that perceptions of peer's teen dating violence (TDV) is associated with one's own perpetration of TDV, although little research has examined whether this relationship is consistent across developmental time periods (i.e., mid‐to‐late adolescence). The present study examined whether changes in perceptions of peer's TDV predicted change in one's own perpetration of TDV in a sample of ethnically diverse adolescents from ages 15 to 18 (N = 1,042). Parallel process modeling demonstrated that decreases in perceptions of peer's TDV predicted decreases in TDV perpetration over time, and this relationship was more pronounced for males than females. These findings lend further support to the need for TDV prevention and intervention programs to include peer influence in their programs.

     

Effects of hazard exposure and roadway complexity on young and older driver situation awareness and performance

Few previous studies of driver situation awareness (SA) have focused on behavior in hazard negotiation. The objective of this research was to assess the effect of hazard exposure on driver SA and interactions with age and roadway complexity. Ten young (18–25 yrs) and ten older (65–81 yrs) participants drove in a simulator under two levels of environment complexity (simple – rural vs. complex – city) with two types of hazard exposure (static vs. dynamic). Situation awareness was measured using real-time probes posed by a confederate passenger. Driving performance was assessed in terms of lane maintenance and speed control. Results revealed hazards to cause degradations in high level of driver SA and speed control or to trigger adaptation, and vulnerability to hazard type was dependent on driver age. Older drivers exhibited greater speed reduction in response to dynamic hazards; whereas, young driver maintained higher speed, as compared to normal driving, when confronted with static hazards. In addition, increased roadway environment complexity compounded decrements in performance caused by hazard exposure. These findings are applicable to modeling driver behavior and SA under hazardous conditions and may support the design of new in-vehicle assistive technologies for hazard avoidance.     

A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the AD8 and BCAT-SF in identifying dementia and mild cognitive impairment in long-term care residents

We compared the accuracy of the Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool—Short Form (BCAT-SF) and AD8 in identifying mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia among long-term care residents. Psychometric analyses of 357 long-term care residents (n = 228, nursing home; n = 129, assisted living) in Maryland referred for neuropsychological evaluation evidenced robust internal consistency reliability and construct validity for the BCAT-SF. Furthermore, hierarchical logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analyses demonstrated superior predictive validity for the BCAT-SF in identifying MCI and dementia relative to the AD8. In contrast, previously reported psychometric properties or cut scores for the AD8 could not be cross-validated in this long-term care sample. Based on these findings, the BCAT-SF appears to be a more reliable and valid screening instrument than the AD8 for rapidly identifying MCI and dementia in long-term care residents.     

An Examination of Early Maladaptive Schemas among Substance Use Treatment Seekers and their Parents

Early maladaptive schemas, which are cognitive and behavioral patterns of viewing oneself and the world that result in substantial distress, are gradually being documented as important vulnerabilities for substance abuse. Unfortunately, there is limited research on early maladaptive schemas among substance abusers and their family members. Research on this topic may carry important implications for family-focused substance use interventions. The current study examined similarities and differences in early maladaptive schemas among a sample of substance abuse treatment seeking adults (n?=?47) and at least one parent (n?=?58). Results demonstrated that the substance abusers scored higher than their parents on 17 of 18 early maladaptive schemas, with most differences falling into the large effect size range. There were some similarities in the specific early maladaptive schemas endorsed by both groups despite substance abusers scoring higher on all schemas. Implications of these findings for future research and family-focused substance use treatment programs are discussed.     

MEASURING PERCEPTIONS OF THE WORKING ENVIRONMENT FOR WOMEN IN CORPORATE SETTINGS

This study developed a scale to measure individual perceptions of dimensions of the work organization that contribute to a supportive or hostile environment for women. Based on analysis of survey data from 398 respondents working in corporate settings, a scale was developed to measure five dimensions: Dual Standards & Opportunities; Sexist Attitudes & Comments; Informal Socializing; Balancing Work & Personal Obligations; and Remediation Policies & Practices. Women perceived their work environments as significantly more hostile on all five dimensions than did men. Scores on the scale were related to intent to stay with the organization: For both men and women, the friendlier they perceived the work environment for women to be, the longer individuals intended to stay at the company.     

Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception.

Stereoscopic depth estimates are not predictable from the geometry of point disparities. The configural properties of surfaces (surface contours) may play an important role in determining, for example, slant responses to a disparity gradient, and the marked anisotropy in favour of slant around a horizontal axis. It has been argued that variation in slant magnitude are attributable to the degree of perspective conflict present and that anisotropy is attributable to orientation disparity, which varies with the axis of slant. Three experiments were conducted in which configural properties were varied to try and tease apart the respective roles of orientation disparity and conflicting perspective in determining stereoscopic slant perception and slant axis anisotropy. The results could not be accounted for by the magnitude of the orientation disparities present. Conflicting perspective cues appeared to play a role but only for slant around a vertical axis. It was concluded that there are important configural effects in stereopsis attributable neither to orientation disparity nor to perspective.     

Greater dependence on working memory and restricted familiarity in orangutans compared with rhesus monkeys

The prefrontal cortex is larger than would be predicted by body size or visual cortex volume in great apes compared with monkeys. Because prefrontal cortex is critical for working memory, we hypothesized that recognition memory tests would engage working memory in orangutans more robustly than in rhesus monkeys. In contrast to working memory, the familiarity response that results from repetition of an image is less cognitively taxing and has been associated with nonfrontal brain regions. Across three experiments, we observed a striking species difference in the control of behavior by these two types of memory. First, we found that recognition memory performance in orangutans was controlled by working memory under conditions in which this memory system plays little role in rhesus monkeys. Second, we found that unlike the case in monkeys, familiarity was not involved in recognition memory performance in orangutans, shown by differences with monkeys across three different measures. Memory in orangutans was not improved by use of novel images, was always impaired by a concurrent cognitive load, and orangutans did not accurately identify images seen minutes ago. These results are surprising and puzzling, but do support the view that prefrontal expansion in great apes favored working memory. At least in orangutans, increased dependence on working memory may come at a cost in terms of the availability of familiarity.

The prefrontal cortex is critical for a suite of cognitive control processes that are conspicuous in human cognition (Miller 2000; Rougier et al. 2005; Braver et al. 2009). One such process is working memory, which actively maintains representations in a state of heightened access for further processing (Baddeley and Hitch 1974; Engle 2010). Working memory and cognitive control are positively correlated with measures of general intelligence in humans, implicating the prefrontal cortex as a key neural structure in the evolution of human cognition (Gray et al. 2003; Unsworth and Engle 2007; Cole et al. 2012). Some neuroanatomical studies have found that the prefrontal cortex is larger than would be predicted based on body size and visual cortex volume in apes compared with monkeys (Rilling 2006; Passingham and Smaers 2014). These findings suggest that the prefrontal cortex expanded disproportionately in great apes during primate evolution. Disproportionate expansion of the prefrontal cortex in great apes may have resulted in greater capacity for cognitive control functions, such as working memory, compared with monkeys. Thus, studies directly comparing working memory in monkeys and apes are critical to understanding the evolution of intelligence in primates.The role of cognitive control, and thus the prefrontal cortex, varies among memory systems. For instance, working memory relies heavily on cognitive control, consuming substantial cognitive resources, and is known to depend on frontal brain areas (Goldman-Rakic 1995; Fuster 1997). In contrast, familiarity, which is a strength-based memory signal that codes for whether or not a percept has previously been experienced (Kelley and Jacoby 1998; Yonelinas 2002), relies substantially less on cognitive control, consumes fewer cognitive resources, and has been mostly associated with nonfrontal areas of the brain such as the perirhinal cortex (Bachevalier and Mishkin 1986; Brown and Aggleton 2001; Haskins et al. 2008; Tu et al. 2011; O''Neil et al. 2012). Thus, working memory and familiarity vary in the degree to which they rely on cognitive control, and the degree to which they rely on prefrontal areas of the brain.If a relatively large prefrontal cortex enhances cognitive control and working memory, then we should expect recognition memory tests to engage working memory relatively more in apes than in monkeys. We evaluated this hypothesis by comparing the contributions of working memory and familiarity with recognition memory performance in orangutans and rhesus monkeys. Because the orangutans and monkeys here compared have different experience with cognitive testing, we aimed to compare the relative contributions of working memory and familiarity in each species, rather than the absolute accuracy of the two species in a particular memory test. This follows a logic similar to that used in many comparative anatomical studies; for example, those cited here that found the prefrontal cortex is larger in apes relative to body weight or visual cortex volume, rather than simply absolute volume.The relative contributions of working memory and familiarity to behavior can be measured in visual recognition memory tests. In these tests subjects study a sample image at the beginning of each trial and after a delay they are presented with a test consisting of the recently seen sample image among distractors (Fig. 1). The images used in these tests can either be repeated, such that the subject''s job is to determine which image in a set of familiar images was seen most recently, or the images can be trial unique, such that at test subjects need to discriminate a previously seen image from novel distractors. Working memory is critical for solving tests with repeating images, but much less so for tests using trial unique images, where familiarity plays a much greater role (Brady and Hampton 2018a). Monkeys (Jitsumori et al. 1988; Basile and Hampton 2013a) and apes (Harlow 1944; Hayes and Thompson 1953) are more accurate and better tolerate long delay intervals in tests with trial-unique stimuli, when familiarity can support performance. Experimentally naïve monkeys require comparatively little training to demonstrate proficient use of familiarity as a mnemonic cue, compared with the training required to become proficient in using working memory (Mishkin and Delacour 1975). Active working memory and passive familiarity are independent mnemonic processes that can be doubly dissociated. Working memory is impaired by a concurrent cognitive load imposed during the memory interval, while familiarity is not affected (Logie 1986; Jacoby et al. 1989; Basile and Hampton 2013a; Brady and Hampton 2018a). Completing the double dissociation, equating the familiarity of the sample and distractor images during study impairs choice based on familiarity, but not working memory (Brady and Hampton 2018a). Thus, recognition memory tests may allow us to compare the relative contributions of these two memory processes with recognition performance across species.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Recognition memory tests with repeating and trial-unique images. (A) In tests with trial-unique images, each image was only used once as a sample or a distractor within a session. (B) When tested with repeating images, the images were the same on each trial. The sample image was pseudorandomly selected each trial such that each image appeared equally often as the sample or as a distractor.One might expect orangutans to show greater dependence on working memory compared with rhesus monkeys for at least two reasons. First, working memory is highly refined in humans and orangutans are more closely related to humans phylogenetically, sharing a common ancestor 13 million to 14 million years ago (Stewart and Disotell 1998), whereas rhesus monkeys and humans shared a common ancestor ∼32 million years ago (Roos and Zinner 2015). Second, orangutans have a relatively larger prefrontal cortex compared with monkeys (Rilling 2006; Passingham and Smaers 2014). We compared the ability of rhesus monkeys and orangutans to maintain images from different sets in working memory. We also determined the extent to which familiarity contributed to recognition memory performance. Across three experiments, we observed striking species differences. We found that in orangutans, recognition memory performance for both repeating and trial-unique images was controlled by working memory. In contrast, monkeys relied on working memory for repeating images, and on familiarity for trial-unique images. Furthermore, monkeys dramatically outperformed orangutans in tests that exceeded the capacity and duration of working memory, and thus depended on familiarity.     

Examining patterns suggestive of acquisition during functional analyses: A consecutive controlled series of 116 cases

The functional analysis approach described by Iwata et al. (1982/1994) has been used widely to determine the variables evoking and maintaining challenging behavior. However, one potential concern with conducting functional analyses is that repeated exposure to contingencies may induce a novel functional relation. To examine the likelihood of these potential iatrogenic effects, we evaluated social test conditions of the functional analysis for 116 participants and searched for patterns of responding indicative of acquisition. Patterns suggestive of acquisition occurred in 13.70% of tangible reinforcement conditions; however, the prevalence was only slightly lower in the attention condition (8.75%). Much lower prevalence was observed for the escape condition (2.13%). When grouped by quotient score, a pattern of acquisition was just as likely to be observed in the attention condition as in the tangible condition. Additionally, patterns indicative of acquisition were no more likely to be observed with participants who emitted automatically reinforced challenging behavior.     

Exploring the Accuracy and Simplicity of Idiographic Feeling-Performance Models

This study compared 3 types of idiosyncratic feeling-performance profiles: recall profiles, probabilistic-pIZOF profiles, and simplified “trigger” profiles. Ten tennis players created individualized (“initial recall”) profiles before monitoring their feelings and performances during matches (to generate “pIZOF profiles”). Participants identified 4 triggers items from their 12- or 13-item profiles that they felt were critical to their performance. Probabilistic-pIZOF profiles predicted performance correctly 64% of the time. Trigger profiles were 66% accurate (the top 3 were 70% accurate). Initial recall profiles were accurate 40% of the time. The study provides practical information about the utility of simplified profiles, and information about the accuracy of feeling-performance profile predictions. The results are also discussed within the framework of third-wave behavioral approaches such as mindfulness-acceptance-commitment therapies.