Queer ethics and fostering positive mindsets toward non-binary gender,genderqueer, and gender ambiguity

Abstract

Background: Alongside the growth in visibility of gender identities and presentations such as genderqueer, non-binary and gender neutral, there is ridicule and backlash in wider culture, as well as more subtle invisibility and misgendering. While there exists social psychology research about negative and positive attitudes to trans people, this is restricted to those whose gender identity is at odds with their sex assigned at birth, and who identify with binary gender. Social psychology has extended to the more subtle workings of transphobia, but there is little consideration of the distinctiveness of attitudes and responses to those whose genders cannot be attributed in binary ways, and thus how these may be challenged.

Methods: In keeping with the methods of social theory, this article brings together a diverse and complementary range of conceptual fields in new ways to diagnose a novel cause and solution to these negative attitudes. Using queer theory, feminist ethics, and empirical studies in post-tolerance sociology and social psychology, it argues that negative social responses to genderqueerness stem not only from overt prejudice in the form of transphobia but from binary genderism, the conviction that there are only two genders.

Results and conclusion: This article proposes fostering greater diversity-literacy and empathy for difference as a more effective approach than minority identity-based ‘prejudice reduction’ approaches. A norm-critical approach to deconstructing gender norms is proposed, thus fostering positive attitudes to genderqueerness. It is therefore demonstrated how best to foster enabling social contexts for genderqueerness, with positive implications for the physical and social health and wellbeing of gender variant people. This approach can be applied in organizations, institutions, and by service providers who interact with genderqueer individuals, in that it can inform a shift to approaching diversity positively in ways that are not restricted to pre-determined and binary identity categories.     

Background Papers to The National Suicide Prevention Conference: An Overview and Perspective

T he recognition of suicide as a serious public health problem and the advocacy of Americans who have experienced the loss of someone to suicide together have galvanized action to create a national strategy to prevent the loss of life and the suffering that suicide causes. The process began in 1993, when the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations (UN) convened the first Interregional Expert Meeting on the Formulation of National Strategies for the Prevention of Suicide in Calgary and Banff, Alberta, Canada. Building on a document emanating from these deliberations, Prevention of Suicide: Guidelines for the Formation and Implementation of National Strategies ( UN, 1996 ), a public/private partnership has begun national strategy development for the United States. The articles in this special supplement represent one significant achievement of that collaborative effort and a foundation for ongoing work in developing a comprehensive National Suicide Prevention Strategy.     

Centrality in children's best friend networks: The role of social behaviour

Centrality is an indicator of an individual's relative importance within a social group. Predictors of centrality in best friendship networks were examined in 146 children (70 boys and 76 girls, M_age = 9.95). Children completed measures of social confidence, social desirability, friendship quality, school liking, and loneliness and nominated their best friends from within their class at two time points, 3 months apart. Multigroup path analysis revealed gender differences in the antecedents of centrality. Social confidence, social desirability, and friendship quality predicted changes in the indicators of centrality in best friend networks over time. Boys' social behaviour positively predicted changes in centrality, whereas girls' social behaviour negatively predicted changes in centrality. Together, these findings suggest that some aspects of social behaviour are influential for centrality in best friend groups.     

Executive functioning: Developmental consequences on adolescents with histories of maltreatment

Research suggests that children exposed to maltreatment have deficits in executive functioning (EF) but few studies have focused on the adolescent age group. We investigated whether maltreated adolescents had lower EF abilities compared to a group of non‐maltreated adolescents. Forty adolescents with histories of child maltreatment, together with a comparison group of 40 non‐maltreated adolescents matched for age, completed a comprehensive battery of EF tasks. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses, controlling for IQ, were carried out using each of the EF measures as dependent variables to examine group differences. Maltreated adolescents had significantly lower performance than non‐maltreated adolescents on tasks assessing executive loaded working memory, fluency, and inhibition, although switching was not impaired. Emotional and behavioural difficulties (EBD) were included in additional regression analyses to examine whether these variables would explain the group differences. The inclusion of EBD variables had some effect on group differences, as expected, but did not eliminate them. These findings support the theory that impairments in EF may be one underlying reason why adolescents with histories of maltreatment struggle to cope both inside and outside the classroom.     

Rotten apple or rotten barrel? Social identity and children's responses to bullying

Recent research has suggested that bullying behaviour may be understood as a group process, where those involved act in ways predicted by social identity theory ( Ojala & Nesdale, 2004 ). One relevant phenomenon is the black sheep effect, whereby individuals evaluate deviant members of their in‐group more negatively than that of an out‐group. To examine this process, a study was conducted (N = 60) in which 10‐ and 11‐year‐old children were randomly assigned to a high‐status, peripheral or irrelevant group. They were then read a scenario in which a member of the high‐status group bullied a person outside the group and was supported by other high‐status group members. It was found that assigned group membership affected judgements of the acceptability of the bullying behaviour and the likeability of both (a) the high‐status group and (b) the high‐status group member. Specifically, evidence of a black sheep effect meant that high‐status group members showed less liking for the high‐status group member than for the high‐status group, and believed that this member deserved greater punishment than the high‐status group as a whole. Peripheral group members differentiated between the high‐status group member and the high‐status group in terms of liking but not punishment, while members of the irrelevant group did not make a distinction on either measure. Implications for the conceptualization of bullying are discussed.