Putting Everything in Context

In response to Casasanto, Brookshire, and Ivry (2015), we address four points: First, we engaged in conceptual replications of Brookshire, Casasanto, and Ivry (2010), not direct replications. Second, we did not question the validity of Brookshire et al.'s (2010) results, nor the similar findings of other researchers, but instead explained divergent findings within an integrated theoretical framework. Third, challenges to the construct of automaticity, including ours, were widespread, long before Brookshire et al.'s (2010) article. Fourth, the planned comparisons that we reported tested our theoretical claims and offered strong evidence for them.     

Anxiety Trajectories in Adolescents and the Impact of Social Support and Peer Victimization

Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology - This paper examines whether adolescents can be reliably categorized into subgroups based on their patterns of anxiety levels over time and whether...     

Deferentialism: Soames on legal interpretation

Philosophical Studies - This essay explores themes raised by Scott Soames in Chapter Twelve of The World Philosophy Made. Soames’s key contribution is the articulation of a general theory of...