Effect of time and space uncertainty on a vigilance task

Two groups, each of 12 Ss, were instructed to detect increments in light level from displays of one or five lights. Signals appeared in regular and in irregular intervals. The display was flashed on simultaneously for 0.8 sec every 3.2 sec. Signal detection was superior with a display of one light than with a display of five lights. For two extreme response criteria, there was a decrement of false alarms and an increment of beta during a run. These changes were not dependent upon time and spatial uncertainty. There were no systematic changes in correct detections and d’ during a run. No difference was found between central and peripheral light positions. Correlation of measures was also examined.     

Mathematical structures and psychological measurements

The nature of psychological measurements in relation to mathematical structures and representations is examined. Some very general notions concerning algebras and systems are introduced and applied to physical and number systems, and to measurement theory. It is shown that the classical intensive and extensive dimensions of measurements with their respective ordinal and additive scales are not adequate to describe physical events without the introduction of the notions of dimensional units and of dimensional homogeneity. It is also shown that in the absence of these notions, the resulting systems of magnitudes have only a very restricted kind of isomorphism with the real number system, and hence have little or no mathematical representations. An alternative in the form of an extended theory of measurements is developed. A third dimension of measurement, the supra-extensive dimension, is introduced; and a new scale, the multiplicative scale, is associated with it. It is shown that supra-extensive magnitudes do constitute systems isomorphic with the system of real numbers and that they alone can be given mathematical representations. Physical quantities are supra-extensive magnitudes. In contrast, to date, psychological quantities are either intensive or extensive, but never of the third kind. This, it is felt, is the reason why mathematical representations have been few and without success in psychology as contrasted to the physical sciences. In particular, the Weber-Fechner relation is examined and shown to be invalid in two respects. It is concluded that the construction of multiplicative scales in psychology, or the equivalent use of dimensional analysis, alone will enable the development of fruitful mathematical theories in this area of investigation.The editors of this journal should perhaps point out that unanimous agreement with the arguments and points of view expressed in this article is not anticipated. They believe, however, that its publication may stimulate needed thinking and clarification of problems basic to psychological measurement and thus serve the purpose for which the journal was founded.     

A l'occasion du renouvellement de l'annee

Sans résumé     

Traffic Offences: Planned or Habitual? Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour and habit strength to explain frequency and magnitude of speeding and driving under the influence of alcohol

This study addresses the socio‐cognitive determinants of traffic offences, in particular of speeding and drinking and driving. It has two aims: (1) to test the hypothesis of a direct effect of habits on offences (i.e., independent of intentions) by employing a specific measure of habits (i.e., the SRIH) and (2) to analyse the offences by taking account of three distinct parameters: Frequency, usual magnitude (i.e., the most frequent deviation from the law) and maximal magnitude (i.e., the greatest deviation occasionally adopted) in order to represent more accurately the variability of the offending behaviours. A total of 642 drivers replied to a questionnaire. The results corroborate the idea that intention and habit are distinct and direct determinants of offences. The use of the SRIH dismisses the criticisms made with regard to the measure of past behaviour. The distinction between the three behavioural parameters proves to be relevant, as their determinants are not exactly similar. Finally, attitude and subjective norm had direct effects on the maximal magnitude and/or on the frequency of the offence. The discussion concerns the contribution of this study to the analysis of offences as well as its limitations and addresses the theoretical plausibility of the direct effects of attitude and the subjective norm.     

Do incompatible arguments cause extensive processing in the evaluation of arguments? The role of congruence between argument compatibility and argument quality

Previous studies have demonstrated that arguments incompatible with prior beliefs are subjected to more extensive refutational processing, scrutinized longer, and judged to be weaker than arguments compatible with prior beliefs. However, this study suggests whether extensive processing is implemented when evaluating arguments is not decided by argument compatibility, but by congruence between two evaluating tendencies elicited by both argument compatibility and argument quality. Consistent with this perspective, the results of two experiments show that relative to congruent arguments, participants judged arguments eliciting incongruent evaluating tendencies as less extreme in strength, spent more time, and felt more hesitant generating strength judgments for them. The results also show that it is mainly incongruent arguments, not congruent arguments, whose strength ratings were more closely associated with the perceived personal importance of the issue, which intensified the tendency to evaluate arguments depending on argument compatibility. These results suggest that it is the incongruity between argument compatibility and argument quality, and not simply the argument compatibility, that plays a more important role in activating an extensive processing in the evaluation of arguments.     

Sola Scriptura—A Hermeneutical Impossibility and a Doctrinal Necessity: Twenty‐One Theses

The following theses represent an attempt to delineate some of the contemporary basic conditions for maintaining the use of the sola Scriptura in the Lutheran churches. This must, I argue, be done without using it as a means for ignoring other types of information and experience than that which is contained in the Scriptures. I argue that sola Scriptura formulates what is necessary for salvation, but cannot be used to delineate or present all information that is necessary to live in the contemporary world and interpret all contemporary experience.