首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   2778篇
  免费   199篇
  国内免费   1篇
  2024年   4篇
  2023年   36篇
  2022年   31篇
  2021年   50篇
  2020年   95篇
  2019年   101篇
  2018年   130篇
  2017年   126篇
  2016年   153篇
  2015年   101篇
  2014年   110篇
  2013年   349篇
  2012年   175篇
  2011年   191篇
  2010年   98篇
  2009年   111篇
  2008年   125篇
  2007年   121篇
  2006年   96篇
  2005年   100篇
  2004年   89篇
  2003年   86篇
  2002年   62篇
  2001年   30篇
  2000年   29篇
  1999年   33篇
  1998年   29篇
  1997年   26篇
  1996年   29篇
  1995年   14篇
  1994年   15篇
  1993年   15篇
  1992年   19篇
  1990年   14篇
  1989年   11篇
  1988年   10篇
  1987年   10篇
  1986年   9篇
  1985年   12篇
  1984年   16篇
  1983年   13篇
  1982年   10篇
  1981年   14篇
  1980年   8篇
  1979年   9篇
  1978年   7篇
  1977年   7篇
  1976年   10篇
  1974年   6篇
  1973年   7篇
排序方式: 共有2978条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
961.
University students named a 72-ms masked target word that was preceded by two 120-ms consecutively presented words, a prime word followed by a distractor. In Experiment 1, all words were in lowercase letters, whereas in Experiment 2, the target word was changed to uppercase letters. In both experiments there was an accuracy and latency cost (repetition blindness: RB) when the prime was the same word as the target, with the cost much less severe in Experiment 2 than in Experiment 1. A low-frequency distractor impaired target identification compared with a high-frequency distractor. Distractor frequency interacted with target frequency such that high-frequency targets preceded by low-frequency distractors had the lowest accuracy. The results are consistent with a frequency-dependent competition for access to working memory among briefly displayed words. However, there was no clear evidence that effects of target repetition on interword competition play a role in RB. The effects of a letter case change for the target are consistent with a contribution of token distinctiveness to word-order recovery in the intervening-word priming task.  相似文献   
962.
963.
Men often score higher than women do on traits or tendencies marked by hostile dominance. The purpose of the present research was to contribute to an understanding of these gender differences. Four studies (total N?=?494 U.S. undergraduates) administered a modified animal preference test in which participants could choose to be predator or prey animals, but not labeled as such. Men were consistently more interested in being predator animals than women were, displaying a sort of hostile dominance in their projective preferences. Predator self-identifications, in turn, mediated gender differences in outcomes related to hostile dominance. Studies 1 and 2 provided initial evidence for this model in the context of variations in interpersonal arrogance, and Studies 3 and 4 extended the model to nonverbal displays and daily life prosociality, respectively. The findings indicate that gender differences in hostile dominance are paralleled by gender differences in preferring to think about the self in predator-like terms. Accordingly, the findings provide new insights into aggressive forms of masculine behavior.  相似文献   
964.
A fairly robust finding in the deception literature is that lie-tellers show more negative emotion than truth-tellers. Ekman (1985), however, has reasoned that a specific type of negative emotion - anger - is especially difficult to feign and therefore should be more prevalent in truth-tellers who are falsely accused of a transgression than in lie-tellers who are guilty. To our knowledge, Ekman’s prediction has not yet been empirically tested. By comparing the verbal and nonverbal cues associated with truths and lies across a number of lie-eliciting situations, we demonstrate that truth-tellers accused of a wrongdoing do show more anger, both verbally and nonverbally, than lie-tellers accused of the same act, but only in situations where students choose to commit a transgression (or not) and actually believe themselves to be in trouble. Results underlie the importance of taking into consideration the type of lie being told in order to accurately predict deceptive cues.  相似文献   
965.
Witt JK  Sugovic M 《Perception》2010,39(10):1341-1353
According to the action-specific perception account, perception is a function of optical information and the perceiver's ability to perform the intended action. While most of the evidence for the action-specific perception account is on spatial perception, in the current experiments we examined similar effects in the perception of speed. Tennis players reproduced the time the ball traveled from the feeder machine to when they hit it. The players judged the ball to be moving faster on trials when they hit the ball out-of-bounds than on trials where they successfully hit the ball in-bounds. Follow-up experiments in the laboratory showed that participants judged virtual balls to be moving slower when they played with a bigger paddle in a modified version of Pong. These studies suggest that performance and task ease influence perceived speed.  相似文献   
966.
Four studies examined why women appear to be less likely than men to lift weights, despite the documented health benefits. An archival analysis (“Study 1”) pointed to a cultural dissociation between women and strength-related exercise goals. Furthermore, a study of women in a university in the mid-Atlantic United States who envisioned lifting weights in public expressed greater evaluation concerns than those who envisioned doing aerobic exercise (“Study 2”); moreover, greater evaluation concerns seemed to deter them from weight lifting. These findings helped to shed light upon gender-differentiated patterns of gym equipment use (“Study 3a”) and reports of psychological discomfort in gyms (“Study 3b”). This work begins to illuminate the sociocultural context of women’s avoidance of certain types of exercise.  相似文献   
967.
The relationship between coping strategies used by South Asian American women and subjective well‐being (SWB) was studied. Second‐generation women were found to use more support compared with 1st‐generation women. Problem‐solving coping was inversely related to age. Avoidance coping was found to predict SWB when controlling for age and generational status. Se estudió la relación entre las estrategias de afrontamiento empleadas por mujeres americanas surasiáticas y el bienestar subjetivo (SWB, por sus siglas en inglés). Se descubrió que las mujeres de segunda generación emplean más apoyos que los que emplearon las mujeres de primera generación. El afrontamiento basado en la resolución de problemas fue inversamente proporcional a la edad. También se halló que el afrontamiento basado en la evitación puede predecir el SWB, cuando se controlan los datos de edad y estatus generacional.  相似文献   
968.
Despite much psychological research regarding jury decision making, surprisingly little is known about the deliberation process that gives rise to jury verdicts. We review classic jury decision-making research regarding the importance of deliberation and more recent research, investigating deliberation and hung juries, that challenges the view that deliberation does not have an important impact on verdicts. We advocate greater attention to potential cognitive processes during deliberation that might explain the transition between predeliberation preferences and a jury’s ultimate verdict. We then review cognitive work in the group context generally, and the jury context specifically, illustrating the promise of a cognitive perspective on jury deliberation. Finally, we identify cognitive phenomena likely to be particularly valuable in illuminating deliberation behavior.  相似文献   
969.
Rodent studies have suggested that “pattern separation,” the ability to distinguish among similar experiences, is diminished in a subset of aged rats. We extended these findings to the human using a task designed to assess spatial pattern separation behavior (determining at time of test whether pairs of pictures shown during the study were in the same spatial locations). Using a standardized test of word recall to divide healthy aged adults into impaired and unimpaired groups relative to young performance, we demonstrate that aged impaired adults are biased away from pattern separation and toward pattern completion, consistent with the rodent studies.Memory impairment is a common complaint among aging individuals, yet the variability within the aging population is great in both rats (Gallagher et al. 2006; Robitsek et al. 2008) and humans (Hilborn et al. 2009). A rodent model of aging (Gallagher et al. 2006; Wilson et al. 2006) has demonstrated that ∼50% of healthy rats qualify as cognitively “impaired” by scoring outside the range of the young performance in a standard protocol (Gallagher et al. 1993). The other half, the “unimpaired” rats, perform on par with young adults, demonstrating a natural degree of variability in cognitive aging. In this study, we sought to capitalize on the variability observed in the aging of both rats and humans in a study of spatial pattern separation.One source of variability in memory performance is hypothesized to be tied to changes in the input to the dentate gyrus (DG), which has been shown in the rat to be affected by the aging process. Smith et al. (2000) reported a selective impairment in layer II entorhinal input into the DG and CA3 regions of the hippocampus in rats with cognitive impairment. Similarly, the number of synapses in the outer receiving layer of DG was reduced in autopsied aged brains and correlated with earlier performance on a delayed recall task (Scheff et al. 2006). Finally, in a human imaging study, Small et al. (2002) observed that 60% of their aging sample demonstrated diminished MRI signal in the hippocampal region (including the DG) and also had a greater decline in memory performance. These findings support the notion that changes in the DG associated with aging may affect memory performance.The DG may be particularly important for the computations that underlie pattern separation (Treves and Rolls 1994; McClelland et al. 1995; Norman and O''Reilly 2003). “Pattern separation” refers to the process by which similar inputs are stored as distinct, nonoverlapping representations. In contrast, “pattern completion” refers to the process by which an existing representation can be reinstated by the presentation of a partial or degraded cue. Numerous studies in the rodent have identified the importance of the DG for pattern separation using electrophysiological methods (Leutgeb et al. 2004, 2005, 2007; Leutgeb and Leutgeb 2007), immediate early gene expression (Vazdarjanova and Guzowski 2004), lesions (Lee et al. 2005; Gilbert and Kesner 2006; Goodrich-Hunsaker et al. 2008), and even genetic manipulations (Cravens et al. 2006; Kubik et al. 2007; McHugh et al. 2008). Human neuroimaging has also recently identified activity in the DG (and CA3 regions of the hippocampus) in an object pattern separation task (Kirwan and Stark 2007; Bakker et al. 2008).Given the importance of the DG in pattern separation and its vulnerability to changes that occur with aging, studies have begun to examine pattern separation in older adults. Our laboratory has designed a task to examine object-based pattern separation performance in humans (Kirwan and Stark 2007). In this task, pictures of objects were presented either once or repeatedly throughout the task. Critically, some of the items presented were lures that were similar but not identical to previously shown items. The overlapping features of the lures more heavily engaged pattern separation processes. In young adults, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity in the DG was sensitive to the lures, indicating a role in pattern separation processes in both an explicit (Kirwan and Stark 2007) and implicit (Bakker et al. 2008) version of this task. Toner et al. (2009) used the explicit version of this task to demonstrate that older adults showed a greater tendency to identify lures as “old” (repeated) relative to young adults. These findings were also recently replicated in our laboratory (Yassa et al., in press), with the additional demonstration that older adults exhibit greater fMRI CA3/DG activity for the lures during both encoding and retrieval.Since object-based pattern separation appears to be modulated by the DG in humans, we wondered if these findings could be extended to spatial pattern separation. Rodent studies have demonstrated that the DG has a particular role in spatial pattern separation (Gilbert et al. 2001; Kesner et al. 2004). Specifically, Hunsaker et al. (2008) placed rats with localized DG lesions in an environment with two objects spaced 60 cm apart. When the animals were later placed in the same environment with the same objects now placed 40 cm apart, DG-lesioned animals (unlike control animals) did not re-explore the objects or environment. These data suggest that the DG-lesioned rats were not able to discriminate between the training and test environments. That is, they were impaired in spatial pattern separation. Since converging evidence suggests that one feature of the aging process can be characterized as a DG knockdown, we modified this task design for humans to test spatial pattern separation performance in older adults. While the Hunsaker et al. (2008) task emphasized the distance between the two objects as the source of interference creating a greater need for pattern separation, the paradigm presented here moves an object in any direction, changing both the distance and the angle (i.e., changing more of the spatial relations). We posit that this amount of movement (close, medium, or far) may place similar demands on spatial pattern separation processes as in the rodent task.The present study included 20 young adults (mean age 19.9 yr, range 18–27 yr) and 30 aged adults (mean age 70.4 yr, range 59–80 yr). Aged adults completed a battery of standardized neuropsychological tests, including the Mini-Mental State Exam (Folstein et al. 1975), Rey Auditory–Verbal Learning Task (RAVLT) (Rey 1941), Digit Span, Vocabulary, and Matrices subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III (Wechsler 1997). The Vocabulary and Matrices scores were entered into a weighted formula along with age, gender, and education to derive estimated IQ scores (Schoenberg et al. 2003). All aged participants scored within the normal age-adjusted ranges on these measures and were cognitively intact. Younger adults also completed the RAVLT and scored within the normal age-adjusted range. These data are presented in Table 
YoungAged (AU)Aged (AI)
UnimpairedImpaired
Years of age19.9 (2.4)69.1 (5.2)72.9 (4.1)
Years of education14.1 (1.7)a16.7 (1.8)15.5 (2.9)
Gender (male/female)3M/17F6M/14F5M/5F
RAVLT total performance53.5 (6.7)56.2 (6.4)43.4 (6.1)b
RAVLT immediate performance12.1 (1.9)12.2 (1.5)8.3 (1.9)b
RAVLT delay performance11.8 (1.4)11.8 (1.6)6.5 (1.7)b
Estimated IQ120.8 (5.5)115 (6.7)b
Digit span performance18.9 (4.5)17 (3.8)
Mini-Mental State examination28.6 (0.9)28.3 (0.9)
Open in a separate windowAll data are reported as mean (SD).aAn unpaired t-test revealed higher years of education for the aged adults (16.3, SD 2.3) than the young adults (14.1, SD 1.7), t(48) = 3.7, P < 0.001.bIn addition, unpaired t-tests showed a poorer performance for the AI group relative to the AU group for RAVLT Total t(28) = 5.2, P < 0.0001, RAVLT Immediate t(28) = 6.3, P < 0.0001, and RAVLT Delay t(28) = 8.6, P < 0.0001. Although there is a group difference in IQ t(26) = 2.5, P < 0.05, these are largely overlapping distributions, and the AI group''s IQ scores are certainly within normal limits. In addition, there was no relationship between IQ scores and performance on any of the tasks or other measures we used.The Spatial Pair Distance (SPD) task consisted of 10 study and test blocks for a total of 100 test pairs. Participants studied 10 unique pairs of pictures per block and were then tested on whether each of the 10 pairs was in the same or different locations compared to the study session. During the study session, participants viewed pairs of pictures for 2 sec each and were told to “try to remember the location of the pictures.” During the test session, participants were told to indicate (with a key press) whether the pictures were in the same location as before or whether one of the pictures was in a different location. They were not told which of the two pictures might change position and the test was self-paced. Critically, for the different trials, only one picture of the pair changed location. It could be moved a small amount (close; 10%–20% of the screen; 2.64°–5.72° of visual angle), a moderate amount (medium; 25%–35% of the screen; 6.64°–9.38° of visual angle), or a large amount (far; 40%–60% of the screen; 10.62°–15.94° of visual angle) as shown in Figure 1. We limited the placement of the pictures between 10% and 90% of the screen so that the images were never placed along the edge of the computer screen. For the different condition, one of the images was moved in the x-coordinate by a percentage of the screen (i.e., 10%–20% in the close condition) and in the y-coordinate by a percentage of the screen (i.e., 10%–20% in the close condition), while the other image remained in its original location.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.SAME and DIFFERENT (separated into close, medium, and far amounts of movement) conditions for the Spatial Paired Distance task. The dashed-line box demonstrates the original location of the second picture, but was not shown to the participants.The probability to respond “different” for the SAME and three DIFFERENT (close, medium, and far) conditions for young and aged adults is shown in Figure 2A. A 2 × 4 analysis of variance (ANOVA) with group (young and aged adults) as a between-group factor and condition (same, close, medium, far) as a within-group factor revealed a main effect of condition, F(3,192) = 35.62, P < 0.0001. A post-hoc trend analysis revealed a positive linear trend across the four conditions, r2 = 0.62, P < 0.0001. There was no effect of group or an interaction, indicating no overall difference in spatial pattern separation ability between young and aged adults.Open in a separate windowFigure 2.(A) The mean proportion correct for each of the four conditions. There is a main effect of Condition, with a linear trend of increasing DIFFERENT responses across the conditions, but no difference between the younger adults and aged adults. (B) When the aged adults are separated according to their RAVLT Delay performance into impaired (AI) and unimpaired (AU), the AI adults perform significantly worse than both the young and the AU adults on the three DIFFERENT conditions. (C) Averaging the groups'' performance on the DIFFERENT trials emphasizes the finding that AI performance is matched on the SAME condition and is selectively impaired on the DIFFERENT conditions that tax spatial pattern separation.Since we were interested in the variability associated with healthy aging, we explored the aged group further. While rats are typically divided into impaired and unimpaired groups based on their performance in the Morris water maze (Gallagher et al. 1993), we divided the aged group into aged unimpaired (AU) and aged impaired (AI) based on their RAVLT delayed word learning performance. Importantly, the aged impaired individuals scored within the normal range for their own age group (ages 60–80). Aged unimpaired participants scored within the normal range for young individuals (ages 20–29) on the delayed test of the RAVLT (mean words recalled 11.8, range 9–15), whereas aged impaired individuals scored more than 1 standard deviation below these norms (mean words recalled 6.5, range 5–8). Thus, the aged impaired group was not clinically impaired and only mildly impaired relative to the young. While the aged unimpaired (69.1 yr, range 59–78) group is marginally different from the aged impaired (72.9 yr, range 67–80) group, t(28) = 2.02, P = 0.053, there was not a significant correlation (r2 = 0.06, ns) between performance on the DIFFERENT conditions and age as might be expected if age alone were responsible for the pattern separation impairments reported here. These data are presented in Figure 2B.We entered the aged unimpaired and impaired groups into a 3 × 4 ANOVA with Group (Young, AI, and AU) and Condition as factors. We found a main effect of Condition as before, F(3,188) = 29.1, P < 0.0001. Critically, we also found an effect of Group, F(2,188) = 4.7, P < 0.05, such that the aged impaired group performed worse on the DIFFERENT conditions. We then calculated a separation bias score by averaging the three DIFFERENT conditions together (Fig. 2C) and analyzed these scores with a 2 × 2 ANOVA with Group and Condition as factors. Again, there was a main effect of Group F(2,94) = 4.7, P < 0.05; a main effect of Condition, F(1,94) = 500.8, P < 0.0001; and an interaction, F(2,94) = 4.7, P < 0.05. Bonferroni-corrected post-tests identified that the AI group was significantly impaired on the DIFFERENT trials compared to the AU group, t(94) = 4.1, P < 0.001; and the Young group, t(94) = 1.9, P < 0.05. These analyses all emphasize the same finding, namely, that AI individuals are impaired on the conditions taxing spatial pattern separation (i.e., DIFFERENT), but are not impaired on the condition that does not tax separation per se (i.e., SAME).Using the RAVLT delayed recall performance to divide the aged group into AI and AU was an effective way to capture some of the individual variability in memory performance exhibited in the aged group. Indeed, there was a strong correlation between the aged impaired RAVLT scores and their performance on the DIFFERENT trials. We entered the RAVLT delayed recall scores into a linear regression with their performance on the average of the DIFFERENT trials and found a positive linear correlation such that as RAVLT delayed recall scores increased, performance on the different trials increased, r2 = 0.28, P < 0.01 (Fig. 3A). When the AI and AU groups were split, we observed that the AI group''s correlation remained reliable, r2 = 0.40, P < 0.05, while the AU group no longer exhibited a significant correlation, r2 = 0.03, ns. These data support the notion that spatial pattern separation performance may be a sensitive index of memory variability in aging.Open in a separate windowFigure 3.For the aged group, there is a positive relationship between SPD different trial performance and RAVLT delay performance (A), SPD different trial performance and MS separation score performance (B), and MS separation score performance and RAVLT delay performance (C). These positive relationships indicate some shared underlying process that may be captured by individual differences in memory performance during the course of aging.Since we collected additional behavioral measures on the same sample, we sought to determine if spatial pattern separation performance and RAVLT delayed recall performance might predict object pattern separation performance. Twenty-eight of the aged adults also participated in the object pattern separation paradigm as detailed by Yassa et al. (in press). Briefly, participants encoded everyday objects by simply making an indoor/outdoor judgment. During the test session, they viewed the same object (REPEATS), similar objects (LURES), and new objects (FOILS). They were required to make an “old,” “similar,” or “new” judgment for each item. We then computed a separation bias score by subtracting the probability of making “similar” responses to the FOILS from the probability of making “similar” responses to LURES, that is, p(“similar”) | LURE − p(“similar”) | FOIL. As reported by Yassa et al. (in press) the separation bias in the aging group was reduced relative to young adults, consistent with the Toner et al. (2009) findings.If spatial pattern separation as assessed by the SPD task is engaging an underlying process similar to that engaged in object pattern separation, we would predict a positive relationship between SPD and object mnemonic similarity (OMS) task performance. We computed average performance on the DIFFERENT conditions (close, medium, and far) and entered it into a linear regression with the OMS separation score for each individual in the aged group. We observed a positive relationship, r2 = 0.26, P < 0.01, as shown in Figure 3B. Likewise, we hypothesized a positive relationship between the OMS separation score and RAVLT delay performance, since we observed such a relationship with SPD performance. We entered these data into a linear regression and again observed a positive relationship, r2 = 0.22, P < 0.05 (with one OMS outlier greater than two SDs removed), as shown in Figure 3C. We also examined the relationship between SPD performance and Digit Span performance and estimated IQ in the aged group, but we did not find any significant correlations. These data indicate that these measures of both object and spatial pattern separation are behavioral manifestations of a similar underlying process that may also be somewhat accounted for by RAVLT delay recall performance.One pertinent question is whether RAVLT performance would predict SPD performance in the Young group, making it a sensitive measure regardless of aging per se. When we examined this question by entering SPD performance on the average of the DIFFERENT conditions and RAVLT delay performance into a linear regression (two SPD outliers greater than two SDs removed), we found no evidence for this hypothesis (r2 = 0.02, ns). Likewise, it might appear circular to define the AI group based on their poorer RAVLT memory performance and then identify poorer performance on the SPD task. However, the AI versus AU difference is selective for the DIFFERENT condition, yet performance is matched for the SAME condition. One would expect both the SAME and DIFFERENT conditions to be similarly adversely affected if a general memory impairment could account for the poorer AI performance.We suggest that these data support the notion of an impairment in spatial pattern separation processing in AI individuals. Ideally, we would have predicted a gradient of this effect, with more severe impairments in performance in the Close condition and matched performance in the Far condition. Unfortunately, the performance in the Close condition is near the floor, with all groups hovering around chance performance (50%). This potential floor effect may be obscuring a greater deficit in the Close condition for the AI group. On the other end, performance on the Far condition may be suffering a bit from a ceiling effect. Performance in the Far condition is not much better than the same condition in any group, and that same performance is only ∼74% for each group. Therefore, the difficulty associated with this task may be such that we cannot create an “easy” enough Far condition to increase the percentage correct. Indeed, pilot testing on manipulations of this task (moving both items at test instead of just one, for example) did not result in greater accuracy performance for older or younger adults. While these data are not able to speak to a gradient of spatial pattern separation, we would argue that the selective impairments for the AI group for the DIFFERENT condition still reflect a deficit in spatial pattern separation processes.The Spatial Paired Distance task presented here appears to be a measure that is sensitive to individual variations in memory performance associated with aging. The dentate gyrus seems a likely candidate for the source of this variability given its involvement in rodent (Small et al. 2004) and human aging studies (Small et al. 2002). Future research quantifying the structural and functional integrity of the dentate gyrus and other medial temporal lobe structures may elucidate those relationships with this task. Whether the variability associated with this task is a source of natural variation in the aged population or a precursor to mild cognitive impairment and possibly Alzheimer disease (AD) is also not clear. Longitudinal assessment of these or other individuals would be required to determine whether those in the AI group were more likely to develop AD. If such is the case, then the SPD and object mnemonic similarity tasks may be particularly useful for early detection and diagnosis of pathological changes associated with dementia. Similarly, these tasks may be advantageous for use as outcome measures in clinical trials of new medications aimed at addressing these changes.  相似文献   
970.
Spontaneous analog number representations in 3‐year‐old children     
Jessica F. Cantlon  Kelley E. Safford  Elizabeth M. Brannon 《Developmental science》2010,13(2):289-297
When enumerating small sets of elements nonverbally, human infants often show a set‐size limitation whereby they are unable to represent sets larger than three elements. This finding has been interpreted as evidence that infants spontaneously represent small numbers with an object‐file system instead of an analog magnitude system ( Feigenson, Dehaene & Spelke, 2004 ). In contrast, non‐human animals and adult humans have been shown to rely on analog magnitudes for representing both small and large numbers ( Brannon & Terrace, 1998 ; Cantlon & Brannon, 2007 ; Cordes, Gelman, Gallistel & Whalen, 2001). Here we demonstrate that, like adults and non‐human animals, children as young as 3 years of age spontaneously employ analog magnitude representations to enumerate both small and large sets. Moreover, we show that children spontaneously attend to numerical value in lieu of cumulative surface area. These findings provide evidence of young children’s greater sensitivity to number relative to other quantities and demonstrate continuity in the process they spontaneously recruit to judge small and large values.  相似文献   
[首页] « 上一页 [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] 97 [98] [99] [100] 下一页 » 末  页»
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号