首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   56篇
  免费   2篇
  2019年   2篇
  2017年   1篇
  2015年   1篇
  2014年   1篇
  2013年   2篇
  2012年   4篇
  2011年   2篇
  2010年   1篇
  2009年   3篇
  2008年   2篇
  2007年   2篇
  2006年   1篇
  2004年   1篇
  2002年   1篇
  2000年   1篇
  1999年   3篇
  1997年   1篇
  1996年   1篇
  1995年   1篇
  1994年   1篇
  1992年   2篇
  1991年   1篇
  1986年   2篇
  1985年   1篇
  1984年   1篇
  1982年   1篇
  1981年   2篇
  1980年   1篇
  1979年   7篇
  1974年   1篇
  1957年   2篇
  1955年   1篇
  1954年   1篇
  1953年   1篇
  1951年   1篇
  1950年   1篇
排序方式: 共有58条查询结果,搜索用时 140 毫秒
51.
52.
Parental Rights     
ABSTRACT This paper is concerned with the philosophical foundations of parental rights. Some commonly held accounts are rejected. The question of whether parental rights are property rights is examined. It is argued that there are useful analogies with property rights which help us to see that the ultimate justification of parental rights lies in the special value of parenthood in human life. It is further argued that the idea of generation is essential to our understanding of parenthood as having special value and that parental rights properly belong, in the first instance, to natural parents.  相似文献   
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
This paper proposes a principle for adjudicating conflicts between estranged couples over whether the frozen embryos they earlier created together ought to be gestated or destroyed. I argue that the fate of the embryos ought to be determined by the party who would be most harmed by having his or her preferences overruled. But I also claim that, when embryos are destroyed against the opposition of one of their co‐creators, the individual at whose behest this was done owes compensation to his disappointed opposite number, in an amount that reflects the harm accruing to the latter as a result of the termination of the procreative project.  相似文献   
58.
ABSTRACT Welfare states are often urged to secure a social minimum for citizens—a level of material well-being beneath which no-one should be permitted to fall. This paper examines the justification for such a claim. It begins by criticising John Rawls's rejection of the social minimum approach to justice in A Theory of Justice : the argument Rawls uses to justify the Difference Principle, based on what he calls 'the strains of commitment' in the 'original position', actually provides a better justification for a social minimum principle. The paper then examines the substance of that argument outside the context of Rawls's contractarianism, showing that there is a general case for seeing to it that desperate need does not go unmet in a liberal society.  相似文献   
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号