Referenzsemantik in der Partnermodellierung

How can we explain that an assertion on something perceived can be understood in the same manner by somebody who cannot perceive that scene? This problem bases the interest in computational linguistics in how listener modeling could possibly be harmonized with reference semantics. Mental images substituting real perception appear as a way out. The architecture of the listener model has to be adapted to the creation and use of such pictorial data structures. Furthermore, the relation between the latter and a verbal (i. e., propositional) representation must be understood. The resulting architecture of a listener model with reference semantics can be employed to solve communicational problems from three general classes in a better way, as is demonstrated by an example implementation.     

Extraction of relief from visual motion

We quantified the ability of human subjects to discriminate the relative distance of two points from a slanted plane when viewing the projected velocities of this scene (orthographic projection). The relative distance from a plane (called relief) is a 3-D property that is invariant under linear (affine) transformations. As such, relief canin principle be extracted from the instantaneous projected velocity field; a metric representation, which requires the extraction of visual acceleration, is not required. The stimulus consisted of a slanted planeP (specified by three points) and two pointsQ ₁ andQ ₂ that are non-coplanar withP. This configuration of points oscillated rigidly around the vertical axis. We have measured thesystematic error andaccuracy with which human subjects estimate the relative distance of pointsQ ₁ andQ ₂ from planeP as a function of the slant of_P. The systematic error varies with slant: it is low for small slant values, reaches a maximum for medium slant values, and drops again for high slant values. The accuracy covaries with the systematic error and is thus high for small and large slant values and low for medium slant values. These results are successfully modeled by a simple relief-from-motion computation based on local estimates of projected velocities. The data are well predicted by assuming (1) a measurement error in velocity estimation that varies proportionally to velocity (Weber’s law) and (2) an eccentricity-dependent underestimation of velocity.     

Contextual effects in difference judgments

Manipulating stimulus spacing, stimulus frequency, or stimulus range usually affects intensity judgments. In six experiments, I investigated the locus of analogues of these contextual effects in a “difference” estimation task. When all stimuli elicited the same taste quality, stimulus distribution affected the scale values only when water was included in the stimulus set (Experiments 1–3). When the subjective ranges of two taste qualities were manipulated, different scale values were obtained for the separate qualities in the two conditions (Experiment 4). Manipulation of the expected response distribution did not affect the scale values or the responses (Experiments 5–6). It is concluded that shifts in stimulus distributions or stimulus ranges result in shifts in subjective scale values. The contextual effects can be interpreted as relative shifts of a number of gustatory continua, with water lying on a separate continuum. Proposed is a model for context-dependent judgments, consisting of four stages: stimulus classification, stimulus placement, continuum placement, and continuum projection.     

Sweetness suppression in fructose/citric acid mixtures: A study of contextual effects

Twoexperiments investigated whether stimulus context affects ratings for mixtures of dissimilartasting substances (fructose/citric acid) to the same degree that it affects ratings for unmixed substances (fructose). In Experiment 1, replacing mixtures by equisweet unmixed fructose solutions produced virtually no response shifts. The proportion of mixtures in the stimulus set affected only slightly the degree of mixture suppression inferred from the responses. In Experiment 2, both the stimulus type (mixed or unmixed) and the stimulus distribution (positively versus negatively skewed) affected the responses. Several factors that determine the impact of contextual changes are identified: (a) the stage in stimulus processing affected—that of representation on the internal continuum or that of response selection; (b) the size and sources of variation in the affected process; and (c) the degree to which a stimulus is perceptually integrated in the context. In the present study, the sweetness of fructose/citric acid mixtures was largely, but not completely, integrated with the sweetness of unmixed fructose solutions. It is suggested that increased stimulus complexity makes mixture ratings more susceptible to contextual shifts. An analysis relating the size of the contextual shift to the degree of response variability suggests that response-selection processes are more important in determining the responses for unmixed stimuli than they are in determining the responses for mixtures.