Attraktivitätsänderung der Aufgabe nach Mißerfolg. Kognitive Dissonanztheorie versus Leistungsmotivationstheorie

Zusammenfassung Nach der kognitiven Dissonanztheorie steigt die Attraktivität einer Aufgabe nach Mißerfolg, wenn die Vp die Aufgabe zuvor selbst gewählt und nicht zugewiesen bekommen hatte. Nach der Leistungsmotivationstheorie ist die Attraktivitätsänderung abhängig von einer durch den Mißerfolg verursachten Verringerung der erlebten Erfolgswahrscheinlichkeit in Wechselwirkung mit der Ausprägung des überdauernden Leistungsmotivs der Vp. Ändert sich die Erfolgswahrscheinlichkeit in Richtung auf eine Höhe von 30–40%, so steigt die Attraktivität der Aufgabe für erfolgszuversichtlich motivierte Vpn und fällt ab für mißerfolgsängstlich motivierte Vpn.In einem 2×2-Versuchsplan wurde Wahl oder Zuweisung der Aufgabe mit vorwiegendem Erfolgsmotiv der Vp kombiniert. Aus einer selbsthergestellten Attraktivitätsrangfolge von 9 verschiedenen Aufgaben wählt die Vp zwischen der 5. und 6. Aufgabe eine zur Bearbeitung aus oder erhält eine der beiden fest zugewiesen. Nach Mißerfolg stellt die Vp eine erneute Attraktivitätsrangfolge der Aufgaben her.Die innerhalb und zwischen den vier Bedingungskombinationen erhaltenen Ergebnisse entsprechen zu einem größeren Teil der Leistungsmotivationstheorie als der Dissonanztheorie. In der Bedingungskombination, für die beide Theorien gegensätzliche Voraussagen machen (Wahl-Mißerfolgsmotivierte), fallen die Befunde zugunsten der Leistungsmotivationstheorie aus. Diese Theorie zeigt jedoch Schwächen in der Voraussage von Attraktivitätsänderungen unter Zuweisungsbedingungen. Die Dissonanztheorie versagt bei den Mißerfolgsmotivierten. Verbesserungen der Theoriebildung und der experimentellen Prüfung werden erörtert.

---

Change in attractiveness of task after failure. Cognitive dissonance theory versus achievement motivation theory

Summary According to cognitive dissonance theory, the attractiveness of a task increases after failure only when the S has chosen the task but not when it is assigned to him. Achievement motivation theory, on the other hand, states that change in attractiveness depends on a reduction in perceived probability of success, caused by failure. In addition, probabilitiy of success also interacts with the dispositional characteristics of the S's achievement motive. If probability of success increases toward a value of 30–40 per cent, then the attractiveness of the task increases for hope of success Ss but decreases for fear of failure Ss.Choice or assignment of task was combined with predominantely hope of success or fear of failure Ss in a 2×2 experimental design. The S first ranked nine different tasks in their order of attractiveness. While some Ss could further choose to work on either the fifth or sixth ranking task, other Ss were assigned either one of these tasks. A second ranking of attractiveness was obtained after a failure experience.The results, both within and between the four experimental conditions, support mainly the predictions of achievement motivation theory rather than cognitive dissonance theory. In the condition in which opposing predictions can be derived from the two theories (i.e., when choice is offered to fear of failure Ss), the results clearly favor achievement motivation theory. However, this theory is less adequate in predicting changes in task attractiveness under task assignment conditions. Dissonance theory appears to be unable to predict the behavior of the fear of failure Ss. Implications for changes in the theories and further empirial tests are discussed.

     

Typing Speed as a Confounding Variable and the Measurement of Quality in Divergent Thinking

The need to control for writing or typing speed when assessing divergent-thinking performance has been recognized since the early ‘90s. An even longer tradition in divergent-thinking research has the issue of scoring the responses for quality. This research addressed both issues within structural equation modeling. Three dimensions of originality—uncommonness, remoteness, and cleverness—were used to derive an overall quality score. Mixed evidence was found in Study 1 for the direct effect of typing speed on fluency. In addition, indirect effects of typing speed via cognitive complexity on overall quality of ideas were uncovered but marginal in both Study 1 and Study 2. This indirect effect was also found for cleverness in Study 2. Another indirect effects of typing speed via fluency was found for cleverness and uncommonness. These findings indicate that controlling for typing speed is important in online divergent-thinking assessment. The inter-relations of various quality scores pertaining to the dimensions of uncommonness, remoteness, and cleverness were promising in terms of convergent validity. Important problems with respect to these scores were identified and discussed to guide future attempts to measure quality in DT.     

Eye movements of dyslexic children when reading in a regular orthography

Participants were German dyslexic readers (13-year-olds) who-compared to English dyslexic readers-suffer mainly from slow laborious reading and less from reading errors. The eye movements of eleven dyslexic boys and age-matched controls were recorded during reading of text passages and pseudoword lists. For both text and pseudoword reading, the dyslexic readers exhibited more and much longer fixations, but relatively few regressions. Increased length of words and pseudowords led to a greater increase in number of fixations for dyslexic than normal readers. Comparisons across studies suggest that the present German dyslexic eye movement findings differ from English-based findings by a lower frequency of regressions (presumably due to the higher regularity of German) and from Italian findings by longer fixation duration (presumably due to the greater syllabic complexity of German).     

Experimental Evaluation of Near‐ and Far‐Transfer Effects of an Adaptive Multicomponent Working Memory Training

An important question in cognitive science today is whether working memory training leads to transfer effects. Training studies reported no transfer as well as far transfer to untrained abilities (e.g., reasoning), but different methodological problems have not allowed reliable conclusions to be drawn. Furthermore, most samples have consisted of young adults, whereas older adults have rarely been included. This study attempted to address these limitations. Ninety‐one older adults were randomly assigned to a training group or an active or passive control group. Short‐term memory, speed, and reasoning were assessed as far‐transfer criteria. In addition, transfer to everyday life was investigated using an ambulatory assessment method. Although there were significant training effects, no transfer effects were found. Instead, the active control group showed the same increase in the near‐transfer tasks (i.e., working memory) as the experimental group indicating that unspecific factors explain the training gains of older adults. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Testing enhances subsequent learning in older but not in younger elementary school children

In adults, testing can enhance subsequent learning by reducing interference from the tested information. Here, we examined this forward effect of testing in children. Younger and older elementary school children and adult controls studied four lists of items in anticipation of a final cumulative recall test. Following presentation of each of the first three lists, participants were immediately tested on the respective list, or the list was re‐presented for additional study. Results revealed that, compared to additional study, immediate testing of Lists 1–3 enhanced memory for the subsequently studied List 4 in adults and older elementary school children, but not in younger elementary school children. The findings indicate that the forward effect of testing is a relatively late‐maturing phenomenon that develops over middle childhood and is still inefficient in the early elementary school years. Together with the results of other recent studies, these findings point to a more general problem in young children in combating interference.     

Projective identification and working through of the countertransference: A multiphase model

Referring to Melanie Klein's unpublished views on projective identification, Bion's theory of container/contained and Money‐Kyrle's understanding of countertransference as a process of transformation, the author develops a multiphase model of projective identification. He differentiates five subphases of (1) adhesion, (2) penetration, (3) linking of the projection with an internal object of the analyst, (4) transformation and (5) re‐projection. In the author's view the differentiation of overlapping subphases may be helpful to better localize problems of working through the countertransference. Some technical implications are illustrated by brief clinical vignettes. To conclude, the paper discusses typical impasses and options for interpretation.