排序方式: 共有78条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
51.
Brini Stefano Sohrabi Hamid R. Hebert Jeffrey J. Forrest Mitchell R. L. Laine Matti Hämäläinen Heikki Karrasch Mira Peiffer Jeremiah J. Martins Ralph N. Fairchild Timothy J. 《Neuropsychology review》2020,30(1):25-27
Neuropsychology Review - The original version of this article unfortunately contained the following mistakes. 相似文献
52.
53.
54.
55.
Hamid Vahid 《Metaphilosophy》2012,43(3):187-203
This article is concerned with the question of the nature of the epistemic liaison between experience and belief. The problem, often known as the problem of nondoxastic justification, is to see how a causal transition between experience and belief could assume a normative dimension, that is, how perceptual experience serves to justify beliefs about the world. Currently a number of theories have been proposed to resolve this problem. The article considers a particular solution offered by Tyler Burge which, among other things, introduces a new type of positive epistemic status or warrant, namely, entitlement. It contends that Burge's notion of entitlement cannot be of any help in resolving the problem of nondoxastic justification. Burge's account is compared and contrasted with other, similar, approaches to the problem of nondoxastic justification. 相似文献
56.
Style of dress as a perceptual cue in impression formation 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
P N Hamid 《Perceptual and motor skills》1968,26(3):904-906
57.
58.
59.
Hamid Vahid 《Ratio》1995,8(1):70-86
To undermine much of what we ordinarily claim to know, sceptics have often appealed to a principle (known as the principle of closure) according to which knowledge (justification) is closed under known entailment. In this paper after expounding the views of Stein, Klein and others, I shall argue that they all fail to take note of different contexts in which the principle of closure is applied. The relevance of the principle of closure for scepticism is then analyzed in the light of, what I call, the ‘infectious’ character of epistemic contexts. I shall also highlight the similarities in the behaviour of the concepts of justification and confirmation and appeal to certain solutions to the paradoxes of confirmation to provide a comprehensive account of the different instances of the principle of closure. 相似文献
60.