黑格尔的“第三条道路”——《法哲学原理》的合理性与现实性

黑格尔的《法哲学原理》在他整个体系中占据着特别重要的地位,然而自问世以来就不断引发争议和骂名。实际上,黑格尔在政治上既反对复辟派,也反对激进派,他对当时具有进步性质的普鲁士改革抱有希望,这种居间的政治姿态归根结蒂出自哲学家探求真理的理论动机。他从意志自由出发,力图以自由秩序取代自然秩序,从而突破了自然法传统,把社会-国家理论奠定在全新的基础之上。这个内容丰富的"法哲学"揭示出现代人类生活的真实状态与辩证结构,并通过将古代的整体原则与启蒙主义的个体性精神统一起来,力图寻找一条合理性与现实性在其中达成"和解"的"第三条道路",黑格尔也因此被视为"第一位意识到现代性问题的哲学家"。     

大学生物质主义与儒家传统价值观的冲突研究

以价值观冲突理论为依据,探讨中国社会转型时期物质主义与儒家传统价值观的并存给当代大学生带来的心理冲突。采用测谎仪记录被试回答价值观选择两难情境问题时的皮电值,结果发现：对于高儒家传统价值观的大学生而言,物质主义水平的上升会引起其皮电值的显著增加,而对于低儒家传统价值观的大学生则没有这种效应。表明同时拥有高水平的物质主义和儒家传统价值观的大学生会体验到大量的心理冲突。     

On the time course of accessing meaning in a second language: An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of translation recognition

In 2 experiments, relatively proficient Chinese-English bilinguals decided whether Chinese words were the correct translations of English words. Critical trials were those on which incorrect translations were related in lexical form or meaning to the correct translation. In Experiment 1, behavioral interference was revealed for both distractor types, but event-related potentials (ERPs) revealed a different time course for the 2 conditions. Semantic distractors elicited effects primarily on the N400 and late positive component (LPC), with a smaller N400 and a smaller LPC over the posterior scalp but a larger LPC over the anterior scalp relative to unrelated controls. In contrast, translation form distractors elicited a larger P200 and a larger LPC than did unrelated controls. To determine whether the translation form effects were enabled by the relatively long, 750-ms stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between words, a 2nd ERP experiment was conducted using a shorter, 300-ms, SOA. The behavioral results revealed interference for both types of distractors, but the ERPs again revealed different loci for the 2 effects. Taken together, the data suggest that proficient bilinguals activate 1st-language translations of words in the 2nd language after they have accessed the meaning of those words. The implications of this pattern for claims about the nature of cross-language activation when bilinguals read in 1 or both languages are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).     

Consistent left gaze bias in processing different facial cues

While viewing faces, humans often demonstrate a natural gaze bias towards the left visual field, that is, the right side of the viewee’s face is often inspected first and for longer periods. Previous studies have suggested that this gaze asymmetry is a part of the gaze pattern associated with face exploration, but its relation with perceptual processing of facial cues is unclear. In this study we recorded participants’ saccadic eye movements while exploring face images under different task instructions (free viewing, judging familiarity and judging facial expression). We observed a consistent left gaze bias in face viewing irrespective of task demands. The probability of the first fixation and the proportion of overall fixations directed at the left hemiface were indistinguishable across different task instructions or across different facial expressions. It seems that the left gaze bias is an automatic reflection of hemispheric lateralisation in face processing, and is not necessarily correlated with the perceptual processing of a specific type of facial information.     

学习环境、成就目标定向对学业情绪和学业成就的影响:基于物理学科的研究

以733名中学生为被试,采用结构方程模型对物理环境目标结构、成就目标定向、物理学业情绪及物理学业成就的关系建构模型.结果发现:(1)物理环境掌握目标结构对积极高唤醒、积极低唤醒和消极高唤醒学业情绪皆有显著积极预测作用,而物理环境表现目标结构则只对消极高唤醒和消极低唤醒物理学业情绪有显著积极预测作用;(2)通过成就目标定向中介对物理学业情绪的影响效果,物理学业情绪在成就目标和物理学业成就之间起中介作用,但影响模式不同;(3)研究结果支持学业情绪控制-价值扩展模型.     

重新发现屈尔佩:二重心理学思想的演进轨迹与启示

屈尔佩二重心理学思想旨在调和冯特的内容心理学与布伦塔诺的意动心理学,是心理学史上第一次整合心理学自然科学取向与人文科学取向的尝试。文章基于对屈尔佩二重心理学思想演进轨迹的具体分析,尝试厘清其与内容心理学体系之间的继承关系与改良缘由,探究其走近意动心理学的理论动因。最后,从主要贡献和局限两方面来重新发现屈尔佩二重心理学思想的意义与启示。     

Larval zebrafish display dynamic learning of aversive stimuli in a constant visual surrounding

Balancing exploration and anti-predation are fundamental to the fitness and survival of all animal species from early life stages. How these basic survival instincts drive learning remains poorly understood. Here, using a light/dark preference paradigm with well-controlled luminance history and constant visual surrounding in larval zebrafish, we analyzed intra- and intertrial dynamics for two behavioral components, dark avoidance and center avoidance. We uncover that larval zebrafish display short-term learning of dark avoidance with initial sensitization followed by habituation; they also exhibit long-term learning that is sensitive to trial interval length. We further show that such stereotyped learning patterns is stimulus-specific, as they are not observed for center avoidance. Finally, we demonstrate at individual levels that long-term learning is under homeostatic control. Together, our work has established a novel paradigm to understand learning, uncovered sequential sensitization and habituation, and demonstrated stimulus specificity, individuality, as well as dynamicity in learning.

Learning while being exposed to a stimulus (i.e., nonassociative learning) is of great importance in that it triggers intrinsic constructs for subsequent recognition of that stimulus and provides a foundation for associative learning (e.g., learning about relations between stimuli in Pavlovian conditioning and stimuli responses-outcomes in instrumental conditioning). Nonassociative learning precedes associative learning in the evolutionary sequence and involves a broad range of behavioral phenomena including habituation, sensitization, perceptual learning, priming, and recognition memory (Pereira and van der Kooy 2013; Ioannou and Anastassiou-Hadjicharalambous 2018).As the simplest learning form, habituation is defined as the progressively reduced ability of a stimulus to elicit a behavioral response over time (Glanzman 2009; Rankin et al. 2009; Thompson 2009). Such a response reduction is distinguished from sensory adaptation and motor fatigue and is often considered adaptive in that it helps animals to filter out harmless and irrelevant stimuli (Rankin et al. 2009). Since an early study of EEG arousal in cats (Sharpless and Jasper 1956), the habituation phenomenon has been widely documented in invertebrates such as C. elegans (Rankin and Broster 1992; Rose and Rankin 2001; Giles and Rankin 2009; Ardiel et al. 2016) and Aplysia (Glanzman 2009) as well as in vertebrates such as rodents (Bolivar 2009; Salomons et al. 2010; Arbuckle et al. 2015), zebrafish (Best et al. 2008; Wolman et al. 2011; Roberts et al. 2016; Randlett et al. 2019; Pantoja et al. 2020) and humans (Bornstein et al. 1988; Coppola et al. 2013).Accompanying habituation is a process termed sensitization, which in contrast enhances responses to a stimulus over time (Kalivas and Stewart 1991; McSweeney and Murphy 2009; Robinson and Becker 1986). This counterpart of habituation may also be adaptive if it helps animals avoid potentially risky or costly situations (Blumstein 2016; King et al. 2007). Like habituation, sensitization has also been documented in a phylogenetically diverse set of organisms (Cai et al. 2012; Kirshenbaum et al. 2019; Tran and Gerlai 2014; Watkins et al. 2010), suggesting an evolutionarily conserved biological underpinning for both processes. Furthermore, these simple learning forms are observed in various functional outputs of nervous systems ranging from simple reflexes (Blanch et al. 2014; Pantoja et al. 2020; Pinsker et al. 1970; Randlett et al. 2019) to complex cognitive phenotypes (Bolivar 2009; Leussis and Bolivar 2006; Thompson and Spencer 1966) and may represent deeper neurobiological constructs associated with anxiety-memory interplay (Morgan and LeDoux 1995; Ruehle et al. 2012; Sullivan and Gratton 2002). Therefore, understanding basic building blocks of habituation and sensitization is essential to fully understand complex behaviors.Habituation and sensitization have been reported with short-term (intrasession) and long-term (intersession) mechanisms in a number of systems (Rankin et al. 2009; Thompson 2009). Short-term mechanisms sensitize or habituate a response within a session (Meincke et al. 2004; Leussis and Bolivar 2006; Rahn et al. 2013; Byrne and Hawkins 2015). In contrast, long-term mechanisms retain memory formed in previous session and use it to modify behavioral responses in a subsequent session (Rankin et al. 2009).Although both short- and long-term learning and memory have been demonstrated in young larval zebrafish (Wolman et al. 2011; O''Neale et al. 2014; Roberts et al. 2016; Randlett et al. 2019), so far, most paradigms use unnatural stimuli and are designed without integrating sensitization and habituation in the same paradigm. The latter limitation is crucial as the influential dual-process theory, proposed by Groves and Thompson (1970), suggests that the two learning forms interact to yield final behavioral outcomes and therefore assessment of only one process might be confounded by alteration in the other process (Meincke et al. 2004).In this study, we examined stimulus learning in a large population of larval zebrafish using a light/dark preference paradigm over four trials across 2 d. Light/dark preference as a motivated behavior is observed across the animal kingdom (Serra et al. 1999; Bourin and Hascoët 2003; Gong et al. 2010; Lau et al. 2011). Larval zebrafish display distinct motor behaviors that are sensitive to the intensity of both preadapted and current photic stimuli (Burgess and Granato 2007; Burgess et al. 2010; Facciol et al. 2019). In our paradigm with well-controlled luminance history and constant visual surrounding, larval zebrafish generally display dark avoidance and center avoidance (also known as thigmotaxis) with heritable individual variability and are considered fear- or anxiety-related (Steenbergen et al. 2011; Schnörr et al. 2012; Bai et al. 2016; Wagle et al. 2017; Dahlén et al. 2019). From an ethological perspective, the extent of avoidance is likely a readout of the circuitry that balances anti-predation (i.e., avoid the dark and the center) and free exploration (i.e., approach the dark and the center). As described below, we have uncovered stimulus-specific temporal dynamicity of learning (both short term and long term), as well as individual differences in learning that are under homeostatic control.